Test Results

To test overclocked stability, we used the very demanding Gun Metal 2 — Benchmark 2, which pushes systems with its DX9 routines. To be considered stable for test purposes, Gun Metal, our Quake3 benchmark, UT2003 Demo, and Super PI had to complete without incident. Any of these 4, and in particular Super PI and Gun Metal, will crash a less than stable memory configuration. In addition to game benchmarks and Super Pi, Sandra 2004 Unbuffered and Buffered was used to compare memory performance.


OCZ PC3500 Platinum — 2 x 512Mb Double-Bank
Speed Memory Timings
& Voltage
Quake3
fps
UT2003
fps
Sandra UNBuffered Sandra Standard
Buffered
Super PI 2M places
(time in sec)
400DDR
800FSB
2-2-2-5
2.55V
331.3 Fly: 202.49
Bot: 71.27
INT 3124
FLT 3143
INT 4902
FLT 4899
127
433DDR
866FSB
2-2-2-5
2.75V
355.4 Fly: 218.00
Bot: 77.03
INT 3207
FLT 3230
INT 5220
FLT 5210
120
466DDR
933FSB
2-2-3-8
2.85V
375.0 Fly: 229.78
Bot: 82.22
INT 3304
FLT 3321
INT 5618
FLT 5606
112

The OCZ PC3500 Platinum performed better than its rated 2-2-3-6 specification. At DDR400, like Mushkin PC3500 Level II, it allowed the fastest timings we have seen with any high-speed memory. While we could boot at speeds as high as DDR476, DDR466 was the highest stable overclock that we could achieve with the PC3500 Platinum. At that speed, the system was completely stable and there were no problems with any application we tried to run on the computer.

Performance Test Configuration Performance Comparisons
Comments Locked

11 Comments

View All Comments

  • thatsright - Friday, October 31, 2003 - link

    I am extremely skeptical of ALL online/print reviews of any of OCZ's RAM. There have been several verified reports of 'Hand Picked' RAM that was cherry picked just for reviewers. And if you read the Customer Comments on NewEgg.com for buyers of OCZ high end ram, many would like to know why their ram is crapping out at lower timings than what is reviewed here.

    I look at all glowing, 'can't find anything wrong,' 'its the BEST' type reviews as a sham. Sure some will say I don't know what I'm talking about, but I have heard many outraged buyers out their who can't get anywhere with their retail bought RAM sticks, unlike the reviewers who can take it to the hilt with their Evaluation samples. I wonder how AT would do if they had to go out and actually PAY for a review sample. Heaven forbid!

    Heres something to read, to get an idea of what I'm rambling on about. http://news.designtechnica.com/talkback28.html

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now