Asus P4C800-E: Stress Testing

We performed stress tests on the P4C800-E in these areas and configurations:

1. Chipset and motherboard stress testing, which was conducted by running the FSB at 288 MHz with OCZ 3700 GOLD at 5:4 memory ratio (DDR461) with 2 x 256MB double-bank dimms at 2-3-4-6 timings.
2. Memory stress testing, which was conducted by running Corsair 3200LL RAM at 400 MHz with all 4 DIMM slots filled. Two pairs of Corsair TwinX ver.1.2 was used for this test at the lowest memory timings possible. We tested the Corsair because it was one of the memory brands that was not completely stable in the earlier P4C800 Deluxe.

Front Side Bus Stress Test Results:

We ran a full range of stress tests and benchmarks to ensure that the Asus P4C800-E was absolutely stable at each overclocked FSB speed. These stress tests included Prime95 torture tests, which were run in the background for a total of 24 hours.

In addition, we ran several other tasks — data compression, various DX8 and DX9 games, and apps like Word and Excel — while Prime95 was running in the background. Finally, we ran our benchmark suite, which includes ZD Winstone suite, Unreal Tournament 2003, SPECViewperf 7.0, and Gun Metal Benchmark 2.

In addition to tests with 2 DS dimms, we ran tests with 4 DS OCZ 3700 GOLD (4X256) at 288 FSB. With 4 Dimms, we needed to reduce the FSB to 284 to achieve stability at default voltage. In addition, we discovered that 4 double-bank dimms apparently turn-off PAT above 200FSB. This was confirmed by both CPUZ 1.18C and Sandra tests results. At 800FSB (200) 4DS dimms tested faster than 2 DS dimms, while at 1136FSB (284) 4 DS dimms tested slower than 2 DS dimms. CPUZ 1.18C shows Performance Mode “enabled” with 2 DS dimms and with 4 DS dimms at 800FSB. With 4 DS dimms at 1136FSB (284), CPUZ shows Performance Mode “disabled”. 4 SS dimms show Performance Mode “enabled” at all speeds, and Memory Tests confirm PAT is working.

Asus has been contacted for a fix or comments on the high-speed 4 DS dimm issue. We are also investigating whether this is an issue with all 875 boards, or whether it is unique to the P4C800-E. Running 4 DS dimms at 284 FSB is something most users of the P4C800-E will never do, so it is not a huge issue. We will post additional information on this issue here as we have it.

Memory Stress Test Results:

The memory stress test is very simple, as it tests the ability of the P4C800-E to operate at its officially supported memory frequency (400MHz DDR) at the lowest supported memory timings that our Corsair TwinX LL ver. 1.2 can achieve:


Stable Dual DDR400 Timings
(4/4 banks/2 dual-channel populated)
Clock Speed: 200MHz
Timing Mode: Auto
CAS Latency: 2.0
Bank Interleave: N/A
RAS to CAS Delay: 3T
RAS Precharge: 5T
Precharge Delay: 2T
Command Rate: 1T


There have been many reports of problems with Corsair 3200LL on the P4C800 Deluxe, though later BIOS revisions appear to work much better with Corsair memory. We had no problems at all running 4 dimms of 3200LL at 2-2-3-5, which is a bit faster than the Corsair SPD 2-2-3-6 timings.

Since we just used the Asus P4C800-E as our test board for “Searching for the Memory Holy Grail — Part 2”, we were also able to test this Asus with Adata PC4000, Adata PC3500, Corsair XMS4000, Geil Platinum 4000, Kingston HyperX4000, OCZ 4000, and OCZ 3700 GOLD. We had no problem at all with any of the memory tested. The P4C800-E was completely compatible with all the test dimms at both SPD and more aggressive memory timings and voltages.

Asus P4C800-E: BIOS and Overclocking Performance Test Configuration
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • 0sparkie - Tuesday, September 2, 2003 - link

    I have just download the .pdf manual of the P4C800-E. The manual says that "If installing the ATi 9500 or 9700 Pro Series VGA cards, use only the card version PN xxx-xxxxx-30 or later, for optimum performance and overcloking stability (chapter 2.6.4)." As I have just bought a Gigabyte Radeon 9800Pro (GV-R98P128D) Version : PN109-A07500-00 {SN0322009623} I began to worry. Is it compatible? Will it be stable if I OC it? Shall I have the optimum perfomance of my VGA ? If anyone can answer this .... (thanks)
  • amdecos - Tuesday, September 2, 2003 - link

    But what about the 512 vs 1 GB area? That is still expensive territory, especially if you want the higher speed DDR (>3500). Would 1 GB of 3200 DDR even out with 512K of 3500 DDR?
  • Icewind - Tuesday, September 2, 2003 - link

    #17
    Only thing that justifies more then a Gig of memory would be music or video editing and or CAD/arcitechure or an absolute crap load of multitasking.
  • amdecos - Tuesday, September 2, 2003 - link

    The test were based on 2x256 memory yes? Did you also look at 1GB (of 2 or 4 sticks)? Is there a real benefit to gaming by going to 1 GB or is this more a multi tasking benefit?
  • Anonymous User - Tuesday, September 2, 2003 - link

    The whole Prescott support situation is still very clouded.

    Some motherboards might support initial lower speed Prescotts up to 1.5 specs, but not necessarily support later Prescotts (still 478 socket though) which require 2.0 level specs.

    So, be careful what you buy. Even if Abit says they will support Prescott, it doesn't mean that the board in question will support all socket 478 Prescott CPU's up to and including the 3.8GHz model.

    Just so that you know...
  • Anonymous User - Monday, September 1, 2003 - link

    #14 if you want maximum OC ability, do the Abit. If you want stability, get the ASUS. Im more for stability, so you know which one I chose and I couldn't be happier, my P4 just keeps going higher and higher the more I push the FSB
  • Anonymous User - Monday, September 1, 2003 - link

    This board seems solid but i am looking at 2 boards that i want the asus P4C800-E and the abit ic7-max3. Wesley when will you do a review on the ic7-max3 board??
  • Anonymous User - Monday, September 1, 2003 - link

    Awesome review, although I would be very interested in the PSU used in this review.
  • Anonymous User - Sunday, August 31, 2003 - link

    I am thrilled that you are doing reviews for Anandtech now. You test and write for the enthusiast, and the overclocker in particular. This is just the direction that Anandtech needed to go to get me reading the articles again.
    Thanks a lot!
  • Wesley Fink - Sunday, August 31, 2003 - link

    The Asus P4C800-E did NOT drop out of Dual-Channel running 4DS dimms faster than 800FSB. In that configuration, PAT was disabled, which made 4DS dimms about 1 to 2% slower than 2DS dimms. We still don't know if this is true with ALL 875P boards, i.e. an Intel issue, or if is an issue unique to Asus. 4 SS dimms run fine with PAT still working over 800FSB, as does any other configuration.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now