2003 Power Supply Roundup Part II: Better Faster Cheaper
by Kristopher Kubicki on July 31, 2003 1:58 PM EST- Posted in
- Cases/Cooling/PSUs
The EG465 power supply did extremely well in our last power supply roundup. We have not really seen many other new products from Enermax in the last few months, so we obtained a slightly newer version of the supply we reviewed in our first review instead.
From our previous review, you may recall the EG465 PFC’s tight tolerances and excellent features. The new version sports all of these features, but since the slightly different circuitry warrants a separate benchmark for this PSU. The variable fan control, motherboard monitoring and copper/rubber ATX sheath are all included on this power supply. Furthermore, the line we looked at also came in a glossy finish similar to the TTGI units. The unit includes Active PFC as one of its features as well.
The EG465 also comes with Enermax’s trademark variable fan control on the rear of the unit. We have not had problems with Enermax’s variable fan controls. The dial-style fan control assures that the switch can never fall into a halfway position like with Vantec or TTGI. We will touch more on this issue later.
One annoyance the EG651 and the EG465AX both had was a loud “pop” when the power supply was turned off. This occurred whether or not the motherboard was on or not.
Wattages
|
3.3V |
5V |
12V |
-12 |
-5 |
+5vsb |
combined theoretical |
actual combined |
advertised total |
|
|
Enermax EG465AX-VE FCA 460W |
115.50 |
175.00 |
396.00 |
12.00 |
5.00 |
11.00 |
290.50 |
200.00 |
460.00 |
This power supply is really a system builder’s treat. All rails seem to be pretty evenly balanced, with plenty of room on the +3.3V and +12V. The +12V rating appears to be the peak, however. A higher combined rail rating would go a long way for this power supply, but we are just nitpicking rather than criticizing these specifications. When talking to Enermax, one of the features they were very proud of was their strict adhesion with the Intel ATX12V 1.2 standard. Of all the power supplies we looked at, the two Enermax units were the only power supplies which displayed this ATX12V 1.2 compliance. We will see this certainly pays off in the performance benchmarks later on.
Unfortunately, with any quality component, the EG465AX-VE is expensive. Most vendors carry the unit for about $85, which prices it aggressively for system builders. We were very pleased with the performance of this unit, as well.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
70 Comments
View All Comments
Anonymous User - Thursday, August 7, 2003 - link
With each review unit, show a picture of the insides. Some of us can tell the design differences by looking at a picture.Claimed efficiency is a selling feature. An efficient unit doesn't need as much cooling air, and is easier on the electric bill.
See if you can rent a load tester. Do a current ramp on the rails, to see what kind of dynamic response the units have. On +12V, this would happen when going from stop-grant, to 100% computing load. Power supplies overshoot when this happens.
Your memory test is meaningless. A motherboard voltage regulator filters the rails, so this is unlikely to be a source of trouble with memory. Radiated emissions (E or M field) can influence circuitry, but you should use a spectrum analyser plus pickup coil to get some idea.
Another emission test, is EMI coming out of the power supply via the power cord. For example, my Truepower interferes with Channel 4 on my TV set. This means the common mode EMI filter at the input to the PS is insufficient. Consult with an EMI expert on how to measure this.
Overvoltage and overcurrent protection were not mentioned. Some units don't do it on all high output rails. Some don't do it at all. One unit had a circuit breaker on the back, which is a significant difference worth mentioning. The tolerance on some protection circuits is so sloppy, that the unit will burn before it trips.
No review I've read so far has mentioned this clause in the ATX spec which is available from formfactors.org "The maximum short-circuit energy in any output shall not exceed 240 VA, per IEC 60950 requirements."
For the high power models which violate this fire containment requirement, will my house insurance cover me if my PC lights the house on fire ?
This requirement could be met by using separate outputs for +12 to motherboard and +12 to drives.
Fire danger is a good reason not to use acrylic windows on a PC case.
Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 6, 2003 - link
"Several months ago, we published our first power supply roundup."Do you mean this one from 42 months ago? :)
http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1128&p...
Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 6, 2003 - link
pretty sweet review,the noise results were v interesting - does this mean that any computer without ECC memory is inherantly unstable?
Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 6, 2003 - link
Hm... The memory test makes me wonder. Two things basically:1) How do you know the errors really are caused by the PSU? The figures suggest that it is, but have all other possible sources been ruled out? The numbers are low, and could be random variations for all I know.
2) If memory content changes during 6 hours without read or write (and only the normal refresh), what does that mean for reliability on computers with up-times of months or even years? On the other hand, this could be the reason servers have ECC memory...
Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 6, 2003 - link
Without wishing to be defamatory, Q-Tec units suck. In life you get what you pay for. These units have no safety circuits at all. They are of 'unlimited' design and the only control mechanism is when a component blows up. In so doing it may well take your mobo etc with it. Their top of the range unit provides less power on the 3.3v and 5v rails that most quality 300 watt units.Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 6, 2003 - link
You show the 'actual combined' on the huge EG651 Enermax at 200 watts. This is less than some 300 watt units. Why did you not highlight this? And why do Enermax put a 651 number on a 550 watt unit? Everyone else uses the number as the rated power figure.Goi - Wednesday, August 6, 2003 - link
I'd like to see reviews of Heroichi(HEC), aka Compucase, as well as Enlight, Topower and if possible Verudium PSUs. Also, the "ripple" measurements were only taken over a 30-60s duration, and only at full load. Other than the fact that what was measured isn't called "ripple" but actually the voltage fluctuation on the individual voltage rail, 30-60s sounds like a very short time window, and this should be measured both at idle and load conditions, since we all know that voltages tend to fluctuate when going from idle to load conditions and/or vice versa.Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 6, 2003 - link
How about Topower PSU's? I have seen a review elsewhere that says their 400W has similar performance to Enermax's (at a much lower price), but it was nowhere near as in-depth as your article.Anonymous User - Tuesday, August 5, 2003 - link
Antec 330 true power's performance on 12v is not enough for a P4 or high end video card? Funny, I have both and haven't had a problem........Anonymous User - Tuesday, August 5, 2003 - link
I personally thought the Antec True Power 330 was shining a little bit in this review. With 31.0 - 34.5 dBa noise, 26.5 - 33.8 C temp, on the lower end of memory errors, and a little tighter voltages than the average, it seems like it gives you the best combination of all categories. The only thing we're missing is some of the wattage testing. What do you guys think? And what about some of the other True Power product line - perhaps the 430 since 330 is at the lower end of PSU size that I would like to get for the power usage of any new computer (the True Control 550 is in a different product line than the True Power).