Alien: Isolation

If first person survival mixed with horror is your sort of thing, then Alien: Isolation, based off of the Alien franchise, should be an interesting title. Developed by The Creative Assembly and released in October 2014, Alien: Isolation has won numerous awards from Game Of The Year to several top 10s/25s and Best Horror titles, ratcheting up over a million sales by February 2015. Alien: Isolation uses a custom built engine which includes dynamic sound effects and should be fully multi-core enabled.

Alien Isolation on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)

Alien Isolation on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)

Alien Isolation on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245)

Alien Isolation on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240)

Alien Isolation on Integrated Graphics

Aside from a small dip by the Core i7-2600K when using the R9 285, the i3-7350K matches the other CPUs in Alien Isolation.

Legacy and Synthetic Tests Gaming: Total War: Attila
Comments Locked

186 Comments

View All Comments

  • Bullwinkle J Moose - Sunday, February 5, 2017 - link

    Correction: Can I record what I hear on the desktop with the DRM crippling API's found in Windows Vista / 7 / 8 and 10 ?

    should be > Can I record what I hear on the desktop with the DRM "crippled" API's found in Windows Vista / 7 / 8 and 10 ?

    The API's do not cripple the DRM
    The DRM does all the crippling !
  • Bullwinkle J Moose - Sunday, February 5, 2017 - link

    Finally got Optical SPDIF working in both Windows 8.1 AND Windows 10 after that rant above!

    Yes, I Really did think that was a DRM issue
    My original USB Soundblaster had optical in and out disabled in software updates after all the hysterical copyright violation complaints
  • Meteor2 - Sunday, February 5, 2017 - link

    RE: why are there no 150-200W consumer CPUs. Because there's no consumer software which could take advantage of 24C/48T CPUs, unlike GPUs.

    Of course, if you want a 150W CPU, you can buy a big Xeon. But there's not a lot of software out there which can make use of them.
  • The_Assimilator - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    Should've rather used an i5-2500K in the comparison; 2c/4t vs 4c/4t is fairer than 4c/8t. Although, a real comparison at 4.6GHz on both chips (or whatever the i3 can hit) would see the KBL obliterated regardless.
  • evilpaul666 - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    I think they said they're working on an overclocking article, but I agree the i5-2500K with both chips overclocked would have been a much more interesting test.
  • Anato - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    Intel should make all K-processors fully enabled, HT, ECC, Cache and sell them cheaply as 2.0-3GHz parts. Then give user tools to make changes to cache, ECC etc and after that its users task to find out what CPU can do. That would bring back good old days and Intel could get rid of cores that are otherwise unsellable.

    Still no need to upgrade from Sandy Bridge i5-2500k and just bought GTX 1080 for it.
  • evilpaul666 - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    So is Optane ever actually coming out? And is it going to actually work as a 16/32GB cache for mechanical storage the ~1500/500 read/write speeds I saw quoted for it a while back would be nice as a cache for HDDs, but are slower than NVMe drives at this point.
  • evilspoons - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    Well, I guess I'm *still* sitting on my i7-2600k overclocked to 4.6 GHz. I pushed it from stock clocks in ~2013 assuming I'd replace it soon but four years later it's still ticking along just fine and I still don't have a compelling upgrade path!
  • ANobody - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    Slow is the death of IPC progress. Painful to watch.
  • Ubercake - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    I would hope an i3 marketed as 5 generations later could match an i7 from 5 generations before?

    Intel has had the market cornered for too long...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now