Alien: Isolation

If first person survival mixed with horror is your sort of thing, then Alien: Isolation, based off of the Alien franchise, should be an interesting title. Developed by The Creative Assembly and released in October 2014, Alien: Isolation has won numerous awards from Game Of The Year to several top 10s/25s and Best Horror titles, ratcheting up over a million sales by February 2015. Alien: Isolation uses a custom built engine which includes dynamic sound effects and should be fully multi-core enabled.

Alien Isolation on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)

Alien Isolation on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)

Alien Isolation on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245)

Alien Isolation on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240)

Alien Isolation on Integrated Graphics

Aside from a small dip by the Core i7-2600K when using the R9 285, the i3-7350K matches the other CPUs in Alien Isolation.

Legacy and Synthetic Tests Gaming: Total War: Attila
Comments Locked

186 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ian Cutress - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    There are some minimum frame rate numbers in Bench, however they're not all regular (they're based on pure min, not 99%). The goal is to have some nicer numbers in our testbed update. Soon. When I find time to finish the script ... :D
  • fanofanand - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    "This RGB fad that apparently sells like hot cakes"

    I love you Ian! In a totally hetero way.....

    Seriously though great article, this should silence all the crybabies who whine about the lack of "Anandtech style in-depth analysis". You are still the best CPU reviewer in the biz!
  • jgarcows - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    I'm still running an i5-2400 at default speeds that I paid $205 for when it first came out. It is insane how slow the improvement of intel chips have been. You'd think by now an i3 would be an upgrade.
  • crashtech - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    Frame times would be what hurts the i3 in games if anything. The averages may not be telling the whole story.
  • djscrew - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    Don't count on this being the new norm. Even though Intel just invalidated a long standing policy and the perception that these are inferior chips with this change I don't think it will lat. The next process shrink will likely bring with it a die size change leaving the i3 people who want to upgrade a few years down SOL. They could simply roll back this "feature" and we're back to status quo.
  • fanofanand - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    Your comment doesn't make sense. The next node will require a new chipset and ANYONE with today's mobos will need to upgrade, EVERYONE will be SOL.
  • jaydee - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    Conclusions page: "A good example of this is Agisoft: the Core i5-7400 (which costs $14 more, quad core, 3.4-3.8 GHz) completes the work ~10% quicker."

    Do you mean the i5-7400 @ 3.0-3.5 GHz, or the i5-7500 @ 3.4-3.8 GHz?
  • Ian Cutress - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    Ah yes, I meant the 7400. I had 2600K numbers in my head at the time. :)
  • name99 - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    "and goes in line with the fact that Intel has officially stated that one of the key features of the new 14+ process is that the transistors are more ‘relaxed’ and there’s no decrease in density."

    Remember those days when Intel was slagging TSMC for no transistor scaling? Ah good times.
    [img] https://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/201... [/img]

    I guess TSMC just decided to "relax" their transistors...
  • name99 - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    "The latest memory technology to hit prime time is Intel and Micron’s 3D XPoint. "

    Where "hit prime time" means "may ship some time in 2019"?
    No-one cares about 3D XPoint in SSDs; and the DRAM version seems utterly MIA since the initial enthusiastic Intel claims. (Come to think of it, much like Intel 10nm ...)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now