Looking To The Future: Mobile, 32-cores and 8K Displays

The volume of the mobile industry today is certainly a hot topic, especially with Intel scrapping their mobile platform as recently as April 2016. This primarily leaves ARM (who was recently acquired by Softbank) in the driving seat for providing the next decade of mobile processor designs. Because ARM sells licences, both processor licences and architecture licences, a number of ARM’s partners have taken the base instructions and decided to forgo ARM’s core designs for their own. This is why we currently see Samsung with their M1 core, Qualcomm with their Kryo core, and Apple with their Twister cores as well, while Huawei, Mediatek and others are combining parts of ARM’s core designs with various GPU designs either from ARM or Imagination. Getting the right combination of parts, as well as the industrial design, are key elements to the user experience as well as the mobile industry as a whole.

Then of course, Mediatek announced the Helio X20 last year, which is finally now in devices. This is a 10-core part, using a paradigm such that the most relevant cores needed for performance and power consumption are in play at the right time. The creation of a 10-core part made a number of industry analysts wonder which direction this market was going in, as on the one end we have the Helio X20, while Apple’s latest iPhone family were using dual-core designs of Apple’s custom implementation. So if 10-cores are too much, this roadmap might come a little surprising.

As we stand in 2016, this roadmap states we are currently in a 6-core mobile CPU arrangement with 12 GPU cores, with the CPU running at 2.8 GHz. Displays are around the Full-HD mark, with overall board power at 4.42W. Well we certainly have hex-core parts today (2xA57 + 4xA53), 12-core GPUs also exist in Apple’s products, and Samsung’s M1 core is rated at 2.8 GHz. Some phones, such as Sony’s Xperia Z5 Premium, already have 4K screens (8.3MP), which is more geared towards 2020 in this roadmap.

Cycle now from 2016 to 2025, almost 10 years in the future. ITRS’ roadmap states the following:

  • 36-cores
  • 247 GPU cores
  • 4.0 GHz
  • 8K Screens (33.2 MP)
  • 61.9 GB/s memory bandwidth
  • 28 Gbit/s WiFi
  • 6.86W Board Power
  • 103 cm2 board area

Now clearly, for this piece I conferred with our mobile team and I got a lot of confused faces. Even scaling down from 16nm in 2016 to 4nm in 2025, they felt that so many all-purpose cores in a chip (as well as all the GPU cores) was probably excessive, not only in terms of utility but also for 2D floor plan. In order to implement this, more z-height would be needed as well as appropriate 3D technologies in place. Andrei felt the frequency targets were more respectable, and the memory bandwidth would depend on how the silicon designers decided to implement on-package DRAM vs multi-channel implementations. The board power seemed a little excessive, if only because the laws of physics can’t change that drastically, and an increase in +50% board area just means a bigger device.

Looking To The Future: NAND Flash Scales Up to 64 TB SSDs in 2030 Looking To The Future
Comments Locked

158 Comments

View All Comments

  • saratoga4 - Wednesday, July 27, 2016 - link

    >As we can see, by 2007 it was predicted that we would be on 10nm chips

    Should be 100 nm (0.1 microns).
  • Jehab - Wednesday, July 27, 2016 - link

    Yeah, that is a massive error, lol.
  • hammer256 - Wednesday, July 27, 2016 - link

    If I remember correctly, intel was running at 65nm in 2007 right? So I guess that was ahead of the curve at the time.
  • JlHADJOE - Saturday, July 30, 2016 - link

    And the 2001 ITR roadmap actually predicted 22nm for 2016. Despite the delays getting to 14/16nm the industry is actually way ahead of the curve.

    http://www2.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/ALS-E...
  • melgross - Wednesday, July 27, 2016 - link

    Exactly! I was going to post that myself. Once it's understood that it's actually 100nm, the other numbers make sense, otherwise, they don't.
  • Walkermoon - Wednesday, July 27, 2016 - link

    Just signed up to say the same.
  • Ian Cutress - Wednesday, July 27, 2016 - link

    Derp, I misread the table in a rush. Updated.
  • Pissedoffyouth - Wednesday, July 27, 2016 - link

    Could you bench it against an AMD A10 Kaveri? That would be good
  • Gc - Saturday, July 30, 2016 - link

    AMD A10-7800 (Kaveri) is in three of the bar charts on page 6. It appears to benefit from 4 cores in two of the comparisons.
  • Zaxx420 - Wednesday, July 27, 2016 - link

    Still have a E8400 rig that I use every day...with it o/ced to 4GHz, 8gb of DDR2-1066 and a OCZ Vertex 2 SSD plus it's 6mb of cache on a P45 mobo...it can hold its own to this day...easily. The E8000 series is one of the best 'future proof' cpus ever...next up imo will prove to be Sandy Bridge. Have a 2500K at 4.5GHz on a Z68 mobo, 16gb DDR3-2400 and a Samsung 850 Pro ssd...and now a GTX 1060...plays any game I want at 1080 and max quality...easily.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now