AnandTech Home IT Portal Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
AMD Opteron vs. Intel Xeon: Database Performance Shootout
AMD Opteron vs. Intel Xeon: Database Performance Shootout
Date: March 2nd, 2004
Topic: IT Computing
Manufacturer: Various
Author: Anand Lal Shimpi, Jason Clark &
Ross Whitehead
Buy the AMD OS2378WAL4DGIWOF Opteron 2378
Blank
 Buy.com $183.99
 PCRush $185.68
 eCost $589.99
 
 

AMD got the attention of Microsoft with their 64-bit Athlon 64/Opteron platform, and it was enough attention to warrant a new OS port to x86-64. Just weeks ago AMD scored another victory, with Intel announcing the adoption of AMD's 64-bit extensions to x86.

Future Xeon and Pentium 4 processors will ship with the x86-64 extensions enabled but architecturally they will be identical to the currently available Prescott based Pentium 4. The architectural similarity between Intel's IA-32e ad IA-32 processors (IA-32e is Intel's marketing equivalent to AMD64) is an important point to note as it means that if Opteron is able to outperform Xeon in 32-bit mode, it will maintain a performance advantage in 64-bit mode as well. We are assuming that Intel has no specialized hardware to improve 64-bit performance over AMD's solution, so the Xeon vs. Opteron comparisons we've brought you in the 32-bit world should still hold true in the 64-bit world later this year.

There has been much editorializing about Intel's recent 64-bit announcement, and we'll add nothing more than this to it all: it's a very good thing that Intel has gone the x86-64 route, it will mean that we see software support, drivers and overall market acceptance sooner. We have AMD to thank for Intel's backing x86-64, which is a big feather in AMD's cap but if there's one thing to be said about business it's that there's no room for pride.

Intel made the right decision; they would be losing sales if they didn't adopt x86-64, leaving those who needed a 64-bit x86 solution no option other than Opteron. However Intel gives AMD nothing if they adopt x86-64 in their own CPUs; AMD's sales don't increase and remember what we said about pride in business.

We'll talk more about Intel's upcoming 64-bit Xeons (Nocona and Potomac) in the conclusion, but let's get to what we're all here to see today: AMD's Opteron and Intel's Xeon go head to head in a real-world database serving comparison.

We compared the two titans in our web serving tests late last year, where AMD left Intel in a cloud of dust. Now the stakes are much higher, can Intel's deeply pipelined architecture contend with AMD's server-grown Opteron?

A Confusing Market   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

58 Comments - Last by Rand, 1726 days ago
Username:
Password:
No Subject by CRAMITPAL, 2170 days ago
No surprises here... Anyone with a clue has known for a year that Opteron/A64 is a far superior architecture to anything Intel bulds, sells, or plans to produce in the next two years.

Reply
No Subject by tolgae, 2170 days ago
Stupid question probably but why didn't you use DDR400 on the Opteron?

Reply
No Subject by raptor666, 2170 days ago
Maybe because 4 way boards might not support it.

Just a guess but honestly i'm not sure.

Peter



Reply
No Subject by christophergorge, 2170 days ago
Opteron only works with ECC registered memory. They only come up to DDR333.

Reply
No Subject by andreasl, 2170 days ago
Hey Anand have you thought about moving to Server 2003 instead of running 2000? And any chance of seeing 64-bit results anytime soon? (does a 64-bit version of your app even exist?)

Reply
No Subject by fukka, 2170 days ago
Would the Opterons gain any advantage using a 64bit OS (aka Linux) and a database that is much bigger than 4GB in size?

That would be interesting to see, but I suppose the IA32e will address that advantage...

Reply
No Subject by Jason Clark, 2170 days ago
64Bit tests are next on our agenda, once there is an Extended 64bit version of SQL Server.... :) We're looking into other avenues as well.

Andreas, windows 2003 enterprise is what we used.

Reply
No Subject by Fraggster, 2170 days ago
intel=pwnd again :)

Reply
No Subject by ViRGE, 2170 days ago
Just a quick question for whoever knows the answer: what's the die size on the 4MB Xeon?

Reply
No Subject by menads, 2170 days ago
To the people that said there is no DDR400 w ECC -that is pure BS! ECC/Reg DDR400 IS available for more than an year and the latest official Opteron SPEC submission of AMD is done with such memory!


Reply
Comments Page 1 of 6

Free Forrester Risk Management Report
Demystifying Enterprise Risk Management. Download Free With Registration.
DOWNLOAD vWire Today - FREE TRIAL
Take Control of Your Virtual Infrastructure. Manage VI Data & Prevent Problems.
Report Unlicensed Business Software Use
Earn Up to $1 Million by Reporting Unlicensed Software Use. Fill Out Our Form!
Download Microsoft Visual Studio ® Team System
Streamline Dev processes, Reduce time to market. Try Microsoft Visual Studio Team System, FREE!
Supermicro Barebone Servers
We Carry Everything Supermicro. Low Price, Top Service, FREE Shipping, and more.




Click Here Click Here
Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank




pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information