Matrox's Parhelia - A Performance Paradox
by Anand Lal Shimpi on June 25, 2002 11:02 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
We organized the charts first by image quality and then by performance which is why they may seem out of order.
|
61.0At 1024x768 in this UT2003 test the Parhelia drops 21% when 16-tap anisotropic filtering is enabled; the GeForce4 drops 38%. The ATI card has the smallest drop, so although it wasn't the fastest it offers the best overall solution.
|
The race is very close between the Radeon 8500 and the GeForce4 Ti 4600, but the image quality of the Radeon give it the edge. If you were to crank up the anisotropy level on the GeForce4 its performance would plummet. The Parhelia is hanging in there but a definite third place in this chart.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
2 Comments
View All Comments
JonathanGrant - Friday, April 24, 2020 - link
Wonderful! I am glad that you shared about the performance of Matrox's Comeback Kid which I choose https://www.researchwritingking.com/review-bestdis... for students. It is always good to see the performance of any kind of product before using it. Thanks for sharing.jasonstatham - Friday, March 4, 2022 - link
Thank you for sharing this kind of content with us as I was thinking about switching from NVIDIA to Matrox to maximize the performance as I also work as a freelance video editor for businesses and as a full time I work as a cheap website content writer UK to help startups to create attractive and engaging content which can rank above the competitor. If you want instant help from more certified and qualified writers you can get from British Blog Writers and also follow their website (https://www.britishblogwriters.co.uk/content-writi... or contact them by phone which is also included in the website.