Civilization: Beyond Earth Minimum Frame Rates

One of the requests I've received since initially posting this overview of performance was to investigate minimum frame rates. All of the necessary data was already available, but I just hadn't spent much time investigating the subject. It turns out the minimum frame rates end up being a bit more interesting when we get to the subject of Mantle.

Before we get to the charts, let me also explain one detail that can be important: I don't really care much about the pure minimum frame rate. If a game has to load a texture or some other hiccup causes a single frame dip to 10 FPS, but all of the remaining frames render at 90FPS over a two minute period, does that one dip matter much? I don't think so. To better show the impact of minimum frame rates, I've averaged the bottom 1% of all frames over the benchmark sequence. This makes the measurement much more significant, because if you're routinely seeing downward spikes in frame rates it can be distracting.

In the case of Civilization: Beyond Earth, I didn't notice any issues with inconsistent frame rates, so this "Lowest 1% FPS" measurement isn't quite so important, but in other games it can mean the difference between reporting 30FPS as the minimum and reporting 130FPS as the first percentile of frame rates. Basically, Civilization: Beyond Earth hits minimum FPS when you zoom all the way out, particularly when there are a lot of units on the screen, and that's exactly what happens in the benchmark at about the halfway point.

With that explanation out of the way, let's look at the charts:

Civilization: Beyond Earth 4K Minimums

Civilization: Beyond Earth QHD Minimums

Civilization: Beyond Earth 1080p Minimums

Civilization: Beyond Earth 1080p High Minimums

One thing that immediately jumps out is that the improvements in minimum frame rates with Mantle tend to be even higher than the improvements in average frame rates. This is actually more or less what you would expect, particularly in this case where the minimum frame rates appear to be caused by CPU bottlenecks on the faster GPUs like the R9 290X. Lighten the CPU load with Mantle and that allows for frames to be generated more quickly in such cases.

Where average FPS only improved about 5-10% with Mantle, the improvements in minimum frame rates are much more noticeable. The lowly R7 250X sees the least benefit, which makes sense as it's almost totally GPU limited. The R7 250X still improves by 3-5% at our highest resolutions, and a more significant 9% increase at 1080p Ultra; but look at the 1080p High result: it's 19% faster on minimum frame rates. What's more, that 19% mark ends up being pretty tame in comparison to the improvements on the faster GPUs.

The R9 280 improves by 12-25%, with the biggest jump coming at 1080p Ultra. The R9 280X sees 17-24% improvements in minimum frame rates, again with the largest increase coming at 1080p Ultra. And then there's the R9 290X. Interestingly, it only sees a small 5% improvement at 4K Ultra, but at QHD it gets a 16% bump; at 1080p Ultra and High settings, Mantle really frees up some additional performance and the minimum frame rates increase by 39% and 53%!

Moving to the AMD vs. NVIDIA side of things, the R9 290X actually manages to come out ahead of the GTX 980 (though just barely) at 4K and QHD resolutions. The margin of victory for AMD is also quite pronounced at QHD, where it leads by a not insignificant 19% with Mantle enabled (but only 3% with DX11). The R9 280X tells a similar story, where it loses to the GTX 770 by a sometimes large margin using the DX11 path, but Mantle closes the gap and often gives the 280X a lead over the 770.

Looking quickly at the laptops, the GTX 980M continues to be a force to be reckoned with, delivering performance generally slightly above that of the GTX 770 and R9 280X, particularly at the GT72's native 1080p resolution. The GTX 880M also manages to stay above 30FPS in our testing, but the 870M and 860M drop into the low to mid 20s. That said, Civilization: Beyond Earth remains playable even at slightly lower frame rates, as the turn-based nature doesn't generally require fast responses and the mouse input is already decoupled from the rendering pipeline.

Civilization: Beyond Earth Performance AMD CrossFire Performance
POST A COMMENT

72 Comments

View All Comments

  • Parrdacc - Thursday, October 23, 2014 - link

    Well, have a Happy Birthday!! Reply
  • przemo_li - Thursday, October 23, 2014 - link

    I think that You make good point about $$ on CPU vs $$ on GPU... for now.

    Cause if Mantle can let us spent $$$ less on CPU then, why not?

    (That ofc. would require more widespread support in games.... Or DX12 Or OpenGL AZDO)
    Reply
  • nevertell - Thursday, October 23, 2014 - link

    Not necessarily. Civilization V was a cpu limited game for the most part. Reply
  • LemmingOverlord - Friday, October 24, 2014 - link

    indeed, Civ V was a great CPU benchmark (akin to Supreme Commander), and the performance scaled quite well with added cores... Reply
  • SuperVeloce - Friday, October 24, 2014 - link

    Civ V scaled well with up to 4 cores if my memory serves me right. Not much more with 6+ cores. Reply
  • just4U - Friday, October 24, 2014 - link

    I was playing civ5 this past week while waiting for the new game... and you know... even on my 4790K it bogs down on big maps. Reply
  • jaredjeya - Friday, October 24, 2014 - link

    Especially as turn time and not FPS becomes the limiting factor late into the game. Anything above 20fps is decent, but if turns take a minute then it's intolerable. Reply
  • doronnac - Thursday, October 23, 2014 - link

    Min. FPS should be tested as it's more important than average when almost all cards demonstrate more than playable performance even at 4K. Reply
  • Mikemk - Thursday, October 23, 2014 - link

    "the built-in benchmark basically represents something of a worst-case scenario for performance"
    Page 1
    Reply
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, October 23, 2014 - link

    I have logs including minimum FPS, but time constraints kept me from spending too much effort analyzing them. What I can say is that when the game zooms all the way out during the benchmark sequence, that's when the minimum occurs and it's usually around 2/3 of the average FPS. GPUs with less VRAM may also be hit harder though. Let me see if I can add some charts for minimums, now that I've managed to get some sleep. :-) Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now