After a weekend of rumors spurred on by a Wall Street Journal report, HP has confirmed this morning that the company intends to split in half next year. The process will see each half become its own independent company, allowing for what amounts to HP’s enterprise and consumer divisions to go their separate ways. By doing so, HP is looking to allow each half to focus on one subset of HP’s overall business, allowing for more focused execution and growth while cutting the bonds that HP believes have made them slow to move in the past.

The split will see HP’s core businesses assigned into one of two companies. HP Inc. the closest of the two companies to an immediate successor to the current HP, will take HP’s PC and printing businesses, along with HP’s other consumer/mobile businesses such as the company’s Chromebooks and tablets. Internally these products are already organized under HP’s Printing and Personal Systems business, so in some senses this is merely moving a business that was its own division into its own company entirely. This split off will also see the current EVP of the Printing and Personal Systems business, Dion Weisler, promoted to CEO of the new HP Inc. Finally, HP Inc. will also be retaining the current HP branding.

Meanwhile the rest of HP’s businesses – servers, networking, storage, software, financial services, and other services– will all be split off together to form the new Hewlett-Packard Enterprise. As alluded to by the name, Hewlett-Packard Enterprise will be focused on HP’s enterprise businesses, where divisions such as the company’s networking business are potential rapid growth markets for HP. HP’s current CEO, Meg Whitman, will be transitioning over to CEO of Hewlett-Packard Enterprise.

HP’s separation in turn is largely borne out of the fact that HP isn’t deriving much of an advantage of keeping all of their businesses under one roof together. HP believes that having the companies split off will mean that each company is better focused on its respective market without the heavy overhead of trying to manage all of these businesses as a single company. In other words, each half will be more flexible/agile than the combined whole. Practically speaking HP has seemed conflicted between consumer and enterprise for some number of years now, and while it’s possible to do both things at once it’s anything but easy. So in lieu of a better reason to have a single company, HP seems content to let each half of the company go their own ways.

What’s interesting is that despite how much bigger Hewlett-Packard Enterprise would seem at first due to its mix of enterprise products, it’s only marginally larger than HP Inc. Based on HP’s most recent revenue, Hewlett-Packard Enterprise would be slightly more profitable than HP Inc. on roughly the same revenue, but from a financial basis at least this isn’t a clear case of ejecting the weaker company. That said, HP does seem more bullish on the growth opportunities for Hewlett-Packard Enterprise than HP Inc. (the latter will pay dividends, for example), which offers some additional rationale for why HP would want to split the company. In any case even split both companies will be quite large, clearing over $50B/year in revenue and putting them in the Fortune 50.

Ultimately HP expects the transaction to be completed by the end of the company’s fiscal year 2015 (Oct. 31, 2015), assuming regulatory approval and no other challenges. This split comes as the latest step as part of the company’s larger 5 year turnaround plan, which if successful HP will be nearing the end of.

Finally, in light of this split it’s interesting to reflect on the state of HP after such a long period of acquisitions and mergers by the company. Over the years HP has acquired a large number of formerly high profile companies, including Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), Compaq, VoodooPC, Palm, 3Com, and Electronic Data Systems (EDS) as part of a larger effort to build up what has become the megalith that they are now taking apart. The combined companies are still larger than the individual companies HP has acquired over the years, but between the previous spin-off of Agilent (HP’s former instruments & equipment business) and now the split into HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, the individual companies are no longer the sort of mixed business conglomerates that HP has been for the last two decades.

Source: HP

POST A COMMENT

16 Comments

View All Comments

  • icrf - Monday, October 06, 2014 - link

    Isn't that a big part of the reason they fired Leo Apotheker a few years ago and replaced him with Meg Whitman who said the company was stronger with both groups attached? Reply
  • Sivar - Monday, October 06, 2014 - link

    Leo wanted to turn HP into a software company and dump the other parts of their business on the open market. He dropped HP's value in half during his very short term. Additionally, he reduced the perceived value of their PC business, which was already shrinking due to the PC market's fall, by offering to sell it publicly without any hope of a buyer, leading to the image of a division that "nobody wants". That perception is not exactly accurate as its PC business is doing quite well, e.g. http://www.itnews.com/financial-results/82832/hp-r...

    Reply
  • melgross - Monday, October 06, 2014 - link

    Actually, if you read that article, it's clear that they didn't think that the growth would be repeated. More importantly, the profits from the entire company were down a large 29%. It's even possible that the PC division, which itself is operating at a loss, contributed an outsized portion of that loss as sales increased.

    Healthy? Not hardly.
    Reply
  • modulusshift - Monday, October 06, 2014 - link

    Yeah, he just didn't have to call attention to it. I'm still upset he killed webOS, though. Reply
  • dsumanik - Tuesday, October 14, 2014 - link

    To be honest this looks like a cop-out from whitman. She's taking the easily manageable and already profitable enterprise, market while spinning off the highly-competitive and low margin consumer pc biz to be someone else's problem. Theres just no way HP is going to make inroads in the phone business ever. I wouldn't buy an HP phone simply because i associate HP with cheap desktops, bloated print drivers and crap tech support.....even if the phone was the best one out there. Shes sitting back a collecting a big fat paycheck here, and HP is going to continue its slow march to death. Reply
  • HardwareDufus - Monday, October 06, 2014 - link

    So basically Compaq computer and HP Enterprise. That would be alot less confusing for everyone. Reply
  • nathanddrews - Monday, October 06, 2014 - link

    I have to wonder if HP Inc. will continue to market the Compaq branding. Kill off the name once and for all? Reply
  • gostan - Monday, October 06, 2014 - link

    Its Compaq computer and EDS. Reply
  • AllYourBaseAreBelong2Us - Monday, October 06, 2014 - link

    No, it is HP Ink and HP Cloud Reply
  • errorr - Monday, October 06, 2014 - link

    There is a very good reason HP is doing this. The HP inc. Group is a dying and diminishing business sector while the enterprise company is much more re focused.on sustainable and growing segments. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now