WiFi

Both Galaxy Tab S devices support 2-stream 802.11ac and can negotiate up to an 866Mbps link speed with a similarly capable router. Peak performance in practice is pretty shy of what we saw with the Galaxy S5 however. While the GS5 was capable of around 430Mbps under best conditions, the Tab S averages around 240Mbps. Compared to the immediate competition it’s not bad, but against everything else we’ve seen it’s less impressive.

WiFi Performance - UDP

Camera

Samsung only gave us a few days with the review samples so I didn’t spend a ton of time focusing on camera performance. The rear facing camera is a 8MP design with F2.4 lens. The front facing camera shoots at 1080p and also has an F2.4 lens. In general the Tab S seems to be a decent shooter in well lit conditions. Low light performance isn’t the worst I’ve seen but it’s not a strong point for sure. Both tablets appear to use the same rear and front camera (Samsung S5K6B2) modules.


Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 Rear Camera Sample

Performance Final Words
POST A COMMENT

98 Comments

View All Comments

  • Laxaa - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    I guess we'll se a revamped model in october/november with 805. Reply
  • GC2:CS - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    No... We will see an entirely new tablet lineup called SAMSUNG GALAXY TAB F Reply
  • retrospooty - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    Then Tab F Pro - all priced too high. Reply
  • hkklife - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    And all will still continue to be gimped with the usual 16GB of internal storage (with 8.5GB available left to the user). It's 2014, not 2011. It's time 32GB became standard across the board no matter what. Also, I wouldn't pay these kinds of prices without having microUSB 3.0 connectivity (I am spoiled by my Note 3) AND wireless charging (to save the aforementioned port from overuse). I'm also slightly miffed by the use of an Exynos instead of a Snapdragon. Now, if they refresh these guys this fall with the latest version of Android, an 801/805, add USB 3.0 from the Tap/Note Pros AND double up the storage while holding the line on the the price then I might consider it! Reply
  • RobilarOCN - Wednesday, June 25, 2014 - link

    What does it matter how much storage is on board? For a Nexus 7 or an IPad it matters but Micro SD cards are dirt cheap... I picked up a 128GB for $110 for my Tab Pro. That is a grand total of 144 GB of storage(less OS and Apps) for just over $500. Compared to $800 for a Mini Retina with 128GB that's almost $300 cheaper. As mentioned the USB 3.0 is too thick to fit into this tablet. I have several devices that I have been charging and using for literally years without any overuse of the micro USB port so why worrry? Reply
  • basroil - Wednesday, June 25, 2014 - link

    Google got rid of saving to apps to SD cards, so it does matter to those that use large HD optimized apps Reply
  • retrospooty - Wednesday, June 25, 2014 - link

    Especially with all the bloatware Samsung puts in it... There will be like 8-9 gb space available for apps. Not good enough Samsung. Not for a $500 device. Reply
  • CanvasExtractor - Sunday, October 12, 2014 - link

    10.5GB available for a $400 device, lol. And remember all the bloatware Google Corporation requires, including but not limited to a social network, a chat app, an extra browser, their ad network, a gaming center, and llittle stores and proprietary apps for music, expensive movies, and even magazines.
    At least Samsung adds things like multi-window, grayscale mode for battery savings, 1% battery.
    Reply
  • rodolfcarver - Friday, October 03, 2014 - link

    Samsung Galaxy Tab S seems to be a choice, although I personally prefer getting one of the top models from Samsung (see http://www.consumertop.com/best-tablets/ for example), but that's just me. Some people might like this! Reply
  • sigmatau - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    I want to see what the they can do with an 808 or 810 that will be using a die shrink. That is what I am interested in for both phones and tablets. They really should be pushing these chips to be released by years end, not early next year. Oh well. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now