3D Movement Algorithm Test

The algorithms in 3DPM employ both uniform random number generation or normal distribution random number generation, and vary in various amounts of trigonometric operations, conditional statements, generation and rejection, fused operations, etc.  The benchmark runs through six algorithms for a specified number of particles and steps, and calculates the speed of each algorithm, then sums them all for a final score.  This is an example of a real world situation that a computational scientist may find themselves in, rather than a pure synthetic benchmark.  The benchmark is also parallel between particles simulated, and we test the single thread performance as well as the multi-threaded performance.

3D Particle Movement Single Threaded

The Gigabyte F2A85X-UP4 seems to have no trouble ramping up to full turbo mode in our single threaded floating point test.  It marginally comes ahead of the other FM2 boards, but the gap is within the margin of error.

3D Particle Movement MultiThreaded

To continue with Gigabyte’s run of being in the pack, our multithreaded floating point test places the board in second place.  The gap to the ASUS board seems a little larger than expected.

WinRAR x64 3.93 - link

With 64-bit WinRAR, we compress the set of files used in the USB speed tests. WinRAR x64 3.93 attempts to use multithreading when possible, and provides as a good test for when a system has variable threaded load.  If a system has multiple speeds to invoke at different loading, the switching between those speeds will determine how well the system will do.

WinRar x64 3.93

Despite the words above, out WinRAR test on the F2A85X-UP4 was a little disappointing being 17 seconds (~5%) behind the top placed FM2/A85X motherboard.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.2 - link

FastStone Image Viewer is a free piece of software I have been using for quite a few years now.  It allows quick viewing of flat images, as well as resizing, changing color depth, adding simple text or simple filters.  It also has a bulk image conversion tool, which we use here.  The software currently operates only in single-thread mode, which should change in later versions of the software.  For this test, we convert a series of 170 files, of various resolutions, dimensions and types (of a total size of 163MB), all to the .gif format of 640x480 dimensions.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.2

Despite the WinRAR result, the Gigabyte stays in the pack in single threaded Faststone.

Xilisoft Video Converter

With XVC, users can convert any type of normal video to any compatible format for smartphones, tablets and other devices.  By default, it uses all available threads on the system, and in the presence of appropriate graphics cards, can utilize CUDA for NVIDIA GPUs as well as AMD APP for AMD GPUs.  For this test, we use a set of 32 HD videos, each lasting 30 seconds, and convert them from 1080p to an iPod H.264 video format using just the CPU.  The time taken to convert these videos gives us our result.

Xilisoft Video Converter 7

Despite the previous differences we saw in multithreaded testing, as Xilisoft uses an integer work load, we can really stretch the legs on Bulldozer-derived processors.  The Gigabyte takes the lead in this test.

x264 HD Benchmark

The x264 HD Benchmark uses a common HD encoding tool to process an HD MPEG2 source at 1280x720 at 3963 Kbps.  This test represents a standardized result which can be compared across other reviews, and is dependant on both CPU power and memory speed.  The benchmark performs a 2-pass encode, and the results shown are the average of each pass performed four times.

x264 HD Pass 1

x264 HD Pass 2

System Benchmarks Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

25 Comments

View All Comments

  • SodaAnt - Friday, December 14, 2012 - link

    I've never been sure why motheboard manufacturers continue to insist on skinning their main windows software instead of just using the default interface options, which in my opinion would go a long way to making their software not look like it was released for windows XP.
  • Flunk - Friday, December 14, 2012 - link

    I always figured that they did that so the software looked like a 6th grade computer project. That way you know that they have to be good at hardware, otherwise who would buy it with such ugly software?
  • arthur449 - Monday, December 17, 2012 - link

    That's the best rationale I've heard yet.
  • DanNeely - Friday, December 14, 2012 - link

    Should 6 SATA cables really be counted as a plus? With the exception of first time builders doesn't everyone already have a huge number of excess cables from older stuffed into their parts box?
  • JonnyDough - Sunday, December 16, 2012 - link

    Agreed. It might be a bit of a PITA to order cables, especially for first time builders but it would be great not creating more garbage. I think we're disposing of enough already, don't you? Just consider that you can't go anywhere on earth without finding trash on the shore.
  • arthur449 - Monday, December 17, 2012 - link

    Either way, we don't have as many as we do power cables.
  • klmccaughey - Sunday, December 30, 2012 - link

    I think the Sata ports make it a very interesting buy. With onboard sound/video that makes it an interesting option for a server / media server.

    I bet there are a lot of people (especially Anand readers) that have a second computer they user as server / bittorrent downloader / backup station all in one. I have one right next to me and had this board been around when I built it I would have been sold on it.

    I use this 'server' as a 4TB Raid5 backup station, it's plugged into one of my monitors so I can use it as a media station to watch stuff while I, um, work ;)

    I have been buying Gigabyte motherboards exclusively for about 8 years now. The reason for that is they are generally really reliable and overclock well. I build quite a lot of systems and they have not once let me down.

    Another use it for your HTPC or media PC.

    Their BIOS though is a bit annoying, but any time I contact their support they know what they are talking about and actually get back to you. ASRock would be my next choice.
  • PA Systems1 - Friday, July 5, 2013 - link

    As I now understand SATA, it requires an SATA 3 cable to get SATA 3 functionality. It is a good thing this mobo has 6 of those cables as I'm going from a build of SATA II to SATA III. Being so way behind the curve I don't have ANY of those updated cables. 6 cables is very generous and I'd thank Gigabyte for that should I choose this board. It's still a tossup between this one, MSI, Asrock or the higher priced ASUS V-Pro boards. I'm reading all these reviews very closely. There isn't any other board I've seen so far that offers 6 SATA cables. Anandtech is as comparable or better than Toms Hardware in providing in depth reviews and helpful information.
  • jameserlay - Friday, December 14, 2012 - link

    Last paragraph, wouldn't it make more sense if it said "peace of mind" instead of "piece of mind"???
  • PA Systems1 - Friday, July 5, 2013 - link

    So we must give the writer/editor a piece of our mind. I've seen worse mistakes.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now