Microsoft Announces Surface Pro Pricing and Availability: 17W IVB Starting at $899 in January 2013by Anand Lal Shimpi on November 29, 2012 2:15 PM EST
Last month I reviewed Microsoft's Surface RT tablet, and came away generally impressed. The form factor and attention to detail were both much better than expected from Microsoft. The integration of the touch/type covers into the design was very well executed in my opinion. That being said, Surface RT seemed to me like a great start but not the perfect product. I would love to see a Cortex A15 based version with some minor tweaks. We'll likely get that next year, but before then there's one more Surface tablet that we'll meet: the Surface Pro.
Surface RT is Microsoft's Windows RT (Windows on ARM) launch vehicle, while Surface Pro is based on Intel x86 hardware. Despite the funny wording in today's blog post, Surface Pro uses an Ivy Bridge based Core i5 (ULV) processor with Intel HD 4000 graphics. Contrary to what I assumed initially, Surface Pro will launch with a 17W Ivy Bridge CPU - so this is the same chip you'll find in modern Ultrabooks. Without a doubt we'll see a Haswell version sometime next year, but not at launch. I wondered if we might see Microsoft use Intel's upcoming 10W Ivy Bridge, but at this point that seems unlikely.
Surface Pro keeps the same display size, but increases tablet thickness by 43% over the RT version. Weight is also up by half a pound. Screen resolution goes up as well, at 1920 x 1080. Memory capacity also increases to 4GB, and Surface Pro comes with much more NAND on-board. With a 7-series chipset you get SATA support, so my money is on Surface Pro having a full blown SSD inside instead of something eMMC based.
|Microsoft Surface Comparison|
|Surface RT||Surface Pro||Apple iPad 4|
|Dimensions||10.81 x 6.77 x 0.37"||10.81 x 6.81 x 0.53"||9.50 x 7.31 x 0.37"|
|Display||10.6-inch 1366 x 768 PLS||10.6-inch 1920 x 1080 PLS?||9.7-inch 2048 x 1536 IPS|
|Weight||1.5 lbs||2.0 lbs||1.44 lbs|
|Processor||NVIDIA Tegra 3||
Core i5 with HD4000 Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
|Connectivity||WiFi||WiFi||WiFi , Optional 4G LTE|
|Storage||32GB or 64GB||64GB or 128GB||16GB—64GB|
|Battery||31.5 Wh||42.0 Wh||42.5Wh|
Battery capacity goes up to 42Wh, an increase of 33%, putting it about on par with the 3rd and 4th generation iPads. Charger size also goes up to 48W compared to 24W with the RT version. Update: Microsoft announced via its Surface Twitter account that the Pro version would offer roughly half the battery life of Surface RT. Without S0ix support, Surface Pro should look a lot like a standard Ultrabook when it comes to battery life. If you want the best of both worlds, Haswell will be what you'll need to wait for.
The big news is we now have pricing for Surface Pro: $899 for the 64GB model and $999 for the 128GB model, both available in January 2013. Both versions come with a Surface pen, but neither includes a touch or type cover. Microsoft's Surface Pro pricing is clearly higher than any other ARM based tablet, but I'd look at it more as an Ultrabook/MacBook Air alternative. I'll reserve final judgement for when I get my hands on a review sample, but I'm pretty interested to see how the Pro does in our tests. This could end up being one of the better Ultrabooks. I do wish Microsoft had thrown in a touch or type cover into the bundle though, that would make it a real alternative to a standard Ultrabook without having to pay for anything else. It is entirely possible that Microsoft is banking on notebook users bringing a more traditional keyboard and mouse for work though.
The other big omission is the lack of Thunderbolt support. I don't know what it is with Microsoft's crusade against Thunderbolt (the port is no longer on Acer's W700 either), but I think that's a big mistake. Surface Pro would be a great platform for Thunderbolt in my opinion.
For full specs check out the Surface Pro on Microsoft's site.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
quiksilvr - Thursday, November 29, 2012 - linkBecause at that price it better.
Old_Fogie_Late_Bloomer - Thursday, November 29, 2012 - linkNope, no keyboard...
retrospooty - Thursday, November 29, 2012 - linkIt does. ITs not bad priced either... You have to remember, this is a fully functional 64 bit windows intallation that can actually run enterprise apps at work, Also 1920x1080 at 10 inches is sweet.
solipsism - Thursday, November 29, 2012 - linkI'm not sure I agree the price is good. I'm sure there are some use cases one could make for this device but for the price I think most would be better served by a laptop.
B3an - Saturday, December 1, 2012 - linkTry getting a laptop with a quality 1080p IPS/PLS touch screen at this price.
You get Ultrabook hardware in this but with an actual good display. It's a very reasonable price.
BellaLohan - Sunday, December 2, 2012 - linkmy friend's step-sister makes $69/hour on the laptop. She has been fired from work for six months but last month her payment was $19911 just working on the laptop for a few hours. (Click on menu Home more information)
uhuznaa - Thursday, November 29, 2012 - linkJust hope that your enterprise apps are still usable when running on a 10" touchscreen with 1920x1080 pixels...
Old_Fogie_Late_Bloomer - Thursday, November 29, 2012 - linkIt does not.
"Both versions come with a Surface pen, but neither includes a touch or type cover."
Impulses - Thursday, November 29, 2012 - linkRTFA... They clearly said it doesn't, it still undercuts any Win 8 i5 tablet in the market and comes close to the price point of some of the Atom ones. It's gonna force some price shifting in current and upcoming products IMO. Personally I think I prefer docking solutions like ASUS' (with an extra battery) but we'll see... 1920x1080 @ 10.6" is also gonna be interesting in the context of the traditional desktop & Office, I hope dpi scaling has improved substantially.
Greg512 - Friday, November 30, 2012 - linkThe price isn't bad at all, really. The MacBook Air 11" doesn't have anywhere near this quality a screen and is in the same league processing-wise. Plus, from a design perspective, I think the Surface is at least competitive with Apple's notebooks. If Microsoft or a third party releases a keyboard-battery dock like you describe, I can see the Surface Pro being a truly viable competitor in the ultraportable space, unlike the Surface RT which I find underwhelming in every respect compared to other ARM-based tablets. Still, I would like to see a high-quality touchpad integrated into a dock-able Surface keyboard. Touching the screen to do everything seems impractical.