AMD Athlon 800

by Anand Lal Shimpi on December 20, 1999 4:47 AM EST

Conclusion

The Athlon 700 was the last Athlon to feature the 1/2 speed L2 cache and it will most likely be a fairly expensive part to pick up even after the 750 and 800MHz parts make their way into the retail channels. The Athlon 800 is just another step in the Athlon line, for AMD, it's purpose is to offer a clock speed competitor to Intel's Pentium III 800, but it's main purpose for most of you will be to drive the prices of the other Athlon processors down which is never a bad thing.

The Athlon 800 will make its official shipping introduction sometime in January, hopefully by then the Athlon 750 will begin to surface around the net as well. It won't be much longer until we begin to hear more about AMD's Thunderbird and Spitfire based Athlon processors featuring a likely 512KB of full speed on-die L2 cache, until then, if you are in the market for an Athlon, the 500 - 600MHz chips are pretty affordable and very high performing solutions. If you must have the best then there will always be the 800, but be warned, the performance gain going from 700 to 800 isn't as great as we'd hope it would be courtesy of the 2/5 L2 cache divider.

All of this makes you wonder, who will be the first to break 800MHz?

For more information on the Athlon 800 take a look at Sharky Extreme's review of the CPU.

3D Studio MAX R2 - Windows NT
POST A COMMENT

1 Comments

View All Comments

  • xrror - Friday, December 12, 2014 - link

    The thing to remember during this era is that coppermine P3's (or at least, any P3 with integrated cache) were pretty much stupid expensive, and unobtanium to get. While with the Athlon 800 you could actually buy one and not be on a wait list for 2 months.

    Also ugh, RAMBUS and 820 were just way too much money. BX @ 133 with a video card that could handle it - which Geforce 2 era cards started to be built for that was where it was at if you were Intel. Or you just waited like everyone else for the Athlon Thunderbird to come out... =)
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now