Gaming Performance

We were expecting gaming performance of the DigitalStorm BlackOps to be pretty impressive. After all, a pair of the fastest single-GPU card on the market should post some amazing framerates, right? So let's start with our "High" benchmark preset and see just how crazy the two 580s really are.

That seems like a little much. The only game that doesn't break 140 frames per second is StarCraft II, which seems to be largely CPU-limited given the tie between the CyberPower unit and the iBuyPower with the much faster graphics subsystem. Other than that, the BlackOps steamrolls the competition—as it should, considering it costs a lot more than any of these other systems do. Given the surplus of performance we have at these settings, maybe bringing antialiasing into the equation with our "Ultra" preset will knock the BlackOps down a peg?

Nope. At this point you could actually argue fairly convincingly that the 580s are CPU-limited by the 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-950. That would sound crazy, but the results seem to bear that out: adding antialiasing barely affects performance in any of these games. Mass Effect 2 and STALKER both take decent dives in performance, but they're both still far beyond playable. Two GeForce GTX 580s are just plain overkill for the 1080p resolution we test at [Ed: Sorry, no 30" LCD for Dustin!], but if you were planning on going 3D Vision or gaming in surround with a pair it's reasonable to assume they'd be more than up for the task.

Application and Futuremark Performance Build, Noise, Heat, and Power Consumption
POST A COMMENT

76 Comments

View All Comments

  • Voldenuit - Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - link

    Nice read, it's interesting to see what the boutique builds can do.

    My question is: what happens when you (manually) tame the voltages and power saving technologies in the system? Can it be brought down to idle more sensibly?

    No question that this should not be expected of the end-user (especially any end user who would buy such a high end rig instead of building their own), but I am curious how efficient a build such as the Blackops can be made to run.
    Reply
  • vol7ron - Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - link

    "especially any end user who would buy such a high end rig instead of building their own"

    When you are immersed with lots of work and little time, live in small dwellings like an apartment/studio, don't have spare parts to test damaged/DOA units, or just don't want to deal with one of the many complications/time that can come from a new build; then you might be one of those end-users that sees this as a viable alternative to building your own.

    Afterall, sites like iBuyPower are great in the fact that you're given the power that an HP/Dell/Apple just can't give you and while there is a little premium, it's only slightly larger than building it yourself - definitely not the markup of the said named brands.

    ------------------------------------------

    Your question of efficiency is unclear. The computer is plenty efficient when it's "sleep"ing :) Of course you can scale the power down, but why would you want to? You're paying all this money not to. You could also remove it from SLI, but again, why would you want to?

    I can see what you're getting at, but this isn't for a notebook, this is a gaming rig =D
    Reply
  • marc1000 - Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - link

    I second your question.

    "what happens when you (manually) tame the voltages and power saving technologies in the system? Can it be brought down to idle more sensibly?"
    Reply
  • L. - Wednesday, March 16, 2011 - link

    Yes.
    This computer is a joke.
    Anyone who knows how to overclock will tell you this is overpriced, failed overclocking, cheap RAM and ... come on. Watercooling for this ?? this can be cooled on air any day (and maybe even with the stock cooler, around 80°C (lol) .

    The guy above says people who have the money but not the time could be interested, I agree but this one is a relatively bad combo.
    Reply
  • bijeshn - Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - link

    Aren't there any desktops in the market sporting a crossfire configuration? All your benchmarks are comparing SLI configs with a single 5870 (AVA Direct Nano Cube). Are they really comparable? Reply
  • GeorgeH - Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - link

    The A-Data RAM ran flawlessly in the machine, but you'd rather see a different brand? Does <Brand X> RAM do something besides run flawlessly?

    You want a different 1200W PSU, but don't mention what's actually in the machine or why you want a Corsair supply? Why? Is the Corsair more efficient, or quieter?

    Your machine runs circles around this because it lacks E-Sata? Really? E-Sata is a $5 bracket, and the machine comes with USB 3.0. Digital audio is a flaw, but how many PC speakers accept digital inputs?

    You mention a price premium, but don't bother to spec out what that is? For the record the parts and OS will run you ~$2800, so it's about an $800 assembly and lazy overclock fee.

    Bottom line this seemed like a really lazy review.
    Reply
  • Kaboose - Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - link

    agreed, seemed rushed, not well thought out and sloppy. -1 Reply
  • bah12 - Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - link

    The biggest flaw (and this is not Dustin's). Was the 1080p resolution game tests. IMO absolutely unacceptable, the type of person buying this rig would certainly "must have" a 30".

    This and yesterday's HTPC case review are 2 articles in a row where he is limited by testing equipment. I get it, he's new. But come on for pete's sake this is Anandtech one of if not the biggest tech site on web, get him a proper test bench or relegate him to news/editorials. Content for the sake of content is DT not AT.

    1080p gaming on a $3,500+ machine...shameful.
    Reply
  • ClownPuncher - Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - link

    30" or a surround setup with 3 monitors. There wasn't any reason to bench this thing at 1920x1080. Reply
  • landerf - Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - link

    Not at all. 2560 displays are slow, expensive and downright a pointless pain to use. Everything is microscopic on them, and it's uncommon to spend 1/3 of your pc's price on the monitor. 1/8-1/10 is much more common. Having an absurdly highend rig I would like more than 1080p, but no more than 1400p Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now