Cooler Master Silent Pro PSUsby Christoph Katzer on September 8, 2008 3:00 AM EST
- Posted in
Package and Appearance
Cooler Master decided to mix things up a bit with the packaging, resulting in a look that's a bit different from other power supplies. As usual, this is just a gimmick and not necessary, but every company feels the need to come up with something "special" to attract the attention of potential buyers. The two sides of the package swing open to reveal the power supply within. Cooler Master lists all the important information on the slip around the package, which allows them to reuse the main box and simply change the paper slip for each different model.
The power supply looks cool with a gigantic 140mm fan that covers the whole bottom area. The front and rear of the power supply have a rubber frame that helps to dampen vibrations during operation. This is another marketing bullet point, but in this case it actually does some useful work. Like most other power supplies, once again we have a black housing with a perforated back that lets the air exhaust from the housing.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Megaknight - Tuesday, September 9, 2008 - linkAnd once again the american consumer is screwed by stupid companies and the stupid US patent system...
Amart - Monday, September 8, 2008 - linkThe Ripple/Noise charts and a dedicated page for Quality are a good decision - thank you.
OverDraught - Monday, September 8, 2008 - linkThe product label does not show the UL mark, which has probably been applied for but not issued yet. No big deal unless you are in the USA and are building computers for resale or lease. If so, check with your product liability carrier before using this product.
Personally, I would never by a PSU that was not UL listed.
JarredWalton - Monday, September 8, 2008 - linkAs stated, the patent issues are keeping this out of the US for now, so the lack of a UL mark might have something to do with that. If/when that's resolved, then we can see if the UL is listed.
Bozo Galora - Monday, September 8, 2008 - linkWell, I feel like I was just struck by lightning.
Actual ripple graphs within an AT PSU review.
Beat me with a giant wet Ramen noodle.
(Anyone see pigs flying?)
semo - Monday, September 8, 2008 - link"Cooler Master advertises their use of small copper plates on the heatsinks as a means of increasing heat dissipation, since copper transfers heat faster than aluminum. Aluminum still dissipates the heat faster to the surrounding air"
so both aluminum and copper dissipate heat faster... compared to what?
also why isn't there any comarison to other psus. For example the sample reviewed here is more expansive than the CoolerMaster 520W Real Power Pro Modular but does it deserve the 50% mark up in price?
Christoph Katzer - Monday, September 8, 2008 - linkhuh? yeah...
Heat goes faster through copper than through aluminum. But aluminum can dissipate the heat faster into the air. This is why we have today mostly aluminum-coolers with a copper base which Cooler Master used for these power supplies now...
We do regular comparisons with the Buyer's Guide and sometimes in roundups.
For starters your mentioned unit comes from Acbel and is not even half as tough as an Enhance-build PSU like the Silentpro.
Howard - Monday, September 8, 2008 - linkI don't believe that aluminum dissipates heat faster than copper does. The reason why we have heatsinks that are a mix is probably because aluminum is much cheaper (and lighter, though that is probably a secondary rather than primary factor).
bludragon - Monday, September 8, 2008 - linkI agree. I think we need mythbusters on this one. Cu has higher conductivity than Al. But, Cu is heavier, more expensive and harder to machine so we reach the compromise of Cu base and Al fins.
PEJUman - Monday, September 8, 2008 - linkIt's true Cu retains heat better than Al.
Here are the simple clues:
Cu have higher conductivity and Specific heat than Al.
Conduction (CPU/Transistor to heatsink) needs good thermal conductivity.
Convection (Heat sink's fins to ambient air) needs a lot of surface area.
While with higher conductivity, Cu will transport heat faster, but with the higher spec. heat Cu will stores more energy than Al (at the same shape and volume) while having the same surface area, thus Cu will be harder to dissipate convectively.
Now the long explaination:
Copper is a good candidate as first line 'heat sink', it will absorb a lot of energy before increasing 1 deg, meaning for a CPU at 47 deg and ambient at 27 deg, it will hold 27... 28... 29... 30 deg longer than Al as it heats up. - GOOD
now comes the drawback, with the high specific heat, when copper try to release heat to ambient air, it will maintain it's hot temperature longer than Aluminum simply because it has to dissipate more energy to ambient air before dropping 1 deg in temp.
So, let's imagine copper fins with the same shape and volume as Al, it will take a lot more air to cool the copper (not to mention it's heavier too) than the Al. - BAD
Thus the reason using Al for fins, and copper for heat block (sink).
asborbing heat from transistor or CPU got to do with small contact surface area, in which case higher thermal conductivity allows lower interface junction temp). while the Al fins dissipate heat more efficiently (in terms of heat flux/weight/size) than cooper.
Now, heat sink is just like any other overclocking quest, you're bound by the weakest link. Thus to come up with a good heatsink assembly you need to have properly sized Cu sink & Al fin.
This means sufficient surface area between the Al & Cu interface to sustain the same heat flux rate that the Cu is capable to aborb and Al fins capable to dissipate.
Mess this balance up, and your again bound by your weakest link, be it your copper block, Al fins of its Cu-Al interface area.