abit Fatality F-I90HD: Board Layout and Features


abit engineered an attention grabbing motherboard that has a unique color layout that we really like. The board easily installed into a variety of micro-ATX cases and most connections were easily reached. The board features a four-phase voltage regulator system that provided very good stability throughout our testing. The abit board features a combination of Conductive Polymer Aluminum Solid Capacitors and Electrolytic Capacitors.

The board comes with four fan headers which is an excellent decision in our opinion. The CPU and System fan headers can be controlled via the BIOS and the abit EQ program within Windows.

Around the CPU socket area, we find an ample amount of room for the majority of cooling solutions. We utilized the stock heatsink/fan in our base testing but also verified several aftermarket Socket-775 cooling solutions would fit in this area during our overclocking tests. The 4-pin ATX power connector is located right behind the optical out port and did not interfere with our various cooling units.

The rear panel contains the standard PS/2 mouse and keyboard ports. The panel also includes a LAN port with activity indicator lights, four USB ports, and an optical out S/PDIF port. The audio panel consists of six ports that can be configured for 2, 4, 6, and 8-channel audio connections for the Realtek ALC888 HD codec. The board also has an HDMI 1.2 and D-Sub port for video out capabilities. If you use the HDMI port with a DVI converter, the PS/2 keyboard port will be blocked.


The DIMM module slots' color coordination is correct for dual channel setup based upon the premise of installing DIMMs in the same colored slots for dual-channel operation. The memory modules are easy to install with a full size video card placed in the PCI Express x16 slot. The 24-pin ATX power connector is properly located on the edge of the board with the IDE connector. The black floppy drive connector is located below the PCI slot and proved to be a difficult location to reach in smaller cases.

We found the positioning of the four red SB600 SATA ports to be excellent when utilizing the expansion slots. The RS600 and SB600 chipsets are passively cooled and remained fairly cool to the touch throughout testing.

The board comes with one physical PCI Express x16 connector, two PCI Express x1 connectors, and one PCI 2.2 connector. The second PCI Express x1 slot will be blocked by a dual slot graphics card. The first PCI Express x1 slot is a tight fit as a card installed in this slot will have minimal clearance between the RS600 heatsink and video card.


We had to raise the CPU cooling fan a little in order to clear the Northbridge heatsink but otherwise this setup worked perfectly in several of our micro-ATX case designs. Cases such as our Silverstone SG-03 and SG-01 would not accept this heatsink due to height restrictions. In those cases we ended up utilizing the retail heatsinks.


The slight offset in location for the PCI Express x16 slot allowed our MSI 8600 GTS to fit on this board with the OCZ HPC Reaper memory. Actually, it just barely fit as it turns out. Our only real issue with this setup is the fact that the CPU ran around 3C higher than the ASRock board since the CPU fan was inhaling hot air off the back of this video card. Also, the first PCI Express x1 slot will be blocked with this combination.

abit Fatality F-I90HD: Feature Set ASRock 4Core1333-FullHD: Feature Set
Comments Locked

22 Comments

View All Comments

  • Brick88 - Thursday, August 30, 2007 - link

    doesn't anyone feel that AMD is cutting itself short? Yes Intel is their primary competitor but by not producing an igp chipset for intel based processors, they are cutting themselves out of a big market. Intel ships the majority of processors and AMD will need every single stream of revenue to compete with Intel.
  • bunga28 - Wednesday, August 29, 2007 - link

    Charles Dickens would roll over his grave if he saw you comparing these 2 boards by paraphrasing his work.
  • Myrandex - Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - link

    I don't knwo why they would ever put that name on the board. the fact that it is getting beat by a ASRock motherboard in gaming performance is pathetic, since that name is supposed to be all about gaming (no offense to the ASRockers out there, as they aren't bad boards I have more experience with them then fatal1ty's anyways).
  • Etern205 - Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - link

    On the "abit Fatality F-I90HD: Feature Set" page,
    that Abit EQ software interface of a car looks
    familar one of those real models.

    Like this one
    <img>http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/8490/toyotafjhh...">http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/8490/toyotafjhh...

    source:
    http://www.automobilemag.com/new_car_previews/2006...">http://www.automobilemag.com/new_car_previews/2006...
  • strikeback03 - Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - link

    I was thinking Hummer, either way...
  • Etern205 - Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - link

    Not really because the face of a Hummer is different
    than the one from Toyota. The face of a Hummer has
    vertical grill bars, while the Toyota does not.
  • strikeback03 - Wednesday, August 29, 2007 - link

    However the Hummer has the full-width chrome fascia, the Toyota has a part-width sorta satin chrome thing.

    I highly doubt they licensed an image of either, so it can't look exactly like any vehicle. I remember a lawsuit between Jeep and Hummer over the 7 vertical slots in eachother's grilles several years ago.
  • eBauer - Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - link

    Why are the Xpress 1250 systems running tighter timings (4-4-4-12) where the G33 system is running looser timings (5-5-5-12)?
  • strikeback03 - Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - link

    quote:

    All of our boards were able to run 4GB of OCZ HPC Reaper at DDR2-800 speeds on 2.04V or less. Our optimal timings for the two X1250 boards were 4-4-4-12 while we had to run at 5-5-5-15 on the MSI G33M board. The MSI board did not care for CAS4 settings with 4GB installed but the overall memory results are still very competitive. In fact, the Sandra unbuffered scores are around 12% better than our X1250 boards and in a couple of our application benchmarks that rely on memory throughput and low latencies, this advantage will be apparent.


    Top of page 8
  • Mazen - Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - link

    I have a 6000+ (gift) and I am just wondering whether I should go with a 690G or wait for nvidia's upcoming MCP 78. Can't wait for the 690G review... thoughts anyone?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now