Board Layout and Features

Click to enlarge

Gigabyte did a really nice job with the layout of this board considering all of the options provided. The color combination continues Gigabyte's recent design trend and is a little over the top for us, but it's not as bad as the more garish color schemes we have seen in the past on other boards. The board was easy to install in our Cooler Master CM Stacker 830 although we recommend installing your air cooler first due to the cramped quarters around the CPU area.

Unfortunately, the location of the 8-pin ATX connector near the CPU area caused cable management issues with a variety of air coolers. We also had trouble attaching our fan cable to the fan header located right under the upper lip of the Silent-Pipe heatsink system installed over the mosfets. The board features a total of four fan headers (two four-pin, two three-pin) with three that are controlled via the BIOS. A fifth one would have been preferred on the far left side of the board. The board features a quad three-phase voltage regulator system and 100% use of Conductive Polymer Aluminum Solid Capacitors that provided superb stability throughout testing.

Click for Additional View

The DIMM module slots' color coordination is correct for dual channel setup based upon the premise of installing DIMMs in the same colored slots for dual-channel operation. It was very easy to install memory modules with a full size video card placed in the first PCI Express x16 slot. Gigabyte places the CPU fan header above the first DIMM slot and it is an easy reach for most CPU fan/heatsink cables. The 24-pin ATX connector, black floppy connector, and the green IDE port connector are located below the DIMM slots along the edge of the board.

We would have preferred the IDE and floppy connectors being reversed as threading the IDE cable over the power cable with the fourth DIMM slot occupied was not a pleasant experience once the board was in the case. In fact, we just wish the floppy connector would have disappeared altogether. The 4-pin 12V Molex connector that is required for SLI operation is located on the far right hand side of the board.

The six nForce 680i SATA ports are yellow and are conveniently located below the 680i MCP. The SATA ports feature the newer clamp and latch design. We found the positioning of the SATA ports to be very good when utilizing the any of the expansion slots, although we had to bend our SATA cable a little when using the first port with a NVIDIA 8800GTX . The MCP is passively cooled and remained hot to the touch throughout testing. The chassis panel and battery are located on the lower left edge of the board along with a two-pin clear CMOS header. The four JMicron JMB363 SATA ports are pink and located along the left edge of the board. We had to use special right angled flat head SATA cables when our second 8800GTX was installed; otherwise the ports are basically blocked.

The board comes with three physical PCI Express x16 connectors (2x16 electrical, 1x8 electrical), one PCI Express x1, and three PCI 2.2 connectors. The layout of this design offers one of the better triple x16 connector designs we have worked with to date. However, the first and third PCI slots will be unavailable if you utilize graphics cards with dual slot cooling solutions.

Click for Additional View

Getting back to CPU socket area, we find a limited amount of room for alternative cooling solutions. We utilized the stock heatsink/fan in our normal testing but also verified a few larger Socket-775 air cooling solutions would fit in this area during our overclocking tests. It was difficult routing the 8-pin ATX power cable with a cooling solution like the Tuniq Tower 120 installed. Our Tuniq 120 and Scythe Infinity coolers fit but had to be oriented in a single position.

The 680i SPP is passively cooled with a mid-rise heatsink unit that did not directly interfere with any installed peripherals or heatsinks. We found the Silent-Pipe heatsink system that Gigabyte designed proved to work quite well during overclock testing with our particular case and cooling system. However, those wanting to run the board at its maximum OC on a 24/7 basis will need additional fan cooling over the heatsinks at all times. The 680i chipset is like a mini-furnace when overclocked.

The rear panel contains the standard PS/2 mouse and keyboard ports, serial port, and four USB 2.0 ports. The two nForce 680i LAN (RJ-45) ports have two LED indicators representing Activity and Speed of the connection. The two Marvell Gigabit PCI-E LAN ports are located between the LAN/USB and Audio ports. The audio panel consists of 6 ports that can be configured for 2, 4, 6, and 8-channel audio connections for the Realtek ALC 888DD HD codec, along with an S/PDIF optical out port.

The back of the board contains Gigabyte's exclusive CrazyCool 2 system that is designed to help dissipate heat from the CPU and chipset areas. We could not tell in subjective testing with this system installed if it worked or not. However, the scientific data that Gigabyte provided does support their temperature reduction claims. If you remove the main CPU plate it requires the removal of the heatsink located over the I/O panel. We found this was the best way to properly mount the Tuniq 120 or other coolers with large back plates.

Basic Features Overclocking Performance


View All Comments

  • sirius4k - Thursday, May 17, 2007 - link

    Overview in Gigabyte' website said there will be some eSATA (Quad eSATA or something) ports. On this preview... read panel indicates no eSATA ports :S
    No eSATA means going back to Striker Extreme... of course.
  • yacoub - Friday, March 30, 2007 - link

    The reviews at NewEgg are tearing this board a gaping butthole. I'm staying away. :[ Reply
  • Gary Key - Monday, April 02, 2007 - link

    Every review at NewEgg was either a four or five star rating for this board. Where are the bad ones? Reply
  • Binkt - Monday, March 19, 2007 - link

    Can someone over there put in a few PCI-E RAID cards in those extra PCI-E slots and see if they function? The Areca SATA RAID cards (ARC-12x0ML) are what I'm looking at right now. Pretty please?!

    There is a rather cryptic FAQ entry on using PCI-E for "graphics" slots on Areca's website in regards to this subject. I'd just like some more physical validation before plunking down the green.
  • erwos - Monday, February 26, 2007 - link

    Am I the only one who's totally and utterly confused as to why this board has four ethernet interfaces? I can see using two interfaces. I could even contemplate three for really weird setups. But what networking setup requires four gigabit interfaces? Are they supposed to be bonded, or used for fail-over?

    Speaking purely as a gamer, the MSI P6N Diamond looks like a better deal. It may be shorter on the ports, but that built-in X-Fi seems a lot more handy than a couple more SATA and ethernet ports.
  • Gary Key - Monday, February 26, 2007 - link

    1. XP Professional will show 3.25GB of RAM when 4GB is installed. The board will show 4GB at POST.

    2. The RAM timings will drop with 4 x1GB when overclocking, at stock speeds with the F3 BIOS they require an additional .0125V to operate at the same timings.

    3. The timings matter when using 2x2GB compared to 2x1GB,512MB, however at same timings we found 2X2GB was generally more stable and performance did not vary more than a percent or two.

    4. If you use a 32-bit OS such as XP you are limited to 3.25GB of usable memory space.

    5. This board did not have an issue with Vista-64 and recognizing 4GB or 8GB of memory, as stated in the article we are still conducting memory compatibility testing as certain modules perform better than others (stability, voltages, timings), even though they are based on the same IC. Gigabyte still has some tuning work to do in this area.

    Thanks, more information will be in the roundup.
  • anandtech02148 - Saturday, February 24, 2007 - link

    per example dfi infity 975g requireds 300watts just to post.
    also what is the idle /load for this? more electricity mo heat.
  • cornfedone - Saturday, February 24, 2007 - link

    ...or don't. As long as gullible, foolish fanboys buy these defective products, there is no FINANCIAL incentive for these unscrupulous companies to change their ways and deliver quality products.

    Obviously if every hardware review site on the planet can duplicate the unending operational (and often design/engineering) defects in these mobos, then certainly the mobo and chip makers could detect these defects BEFORE they ship this crap if they weren't intentionally pumping garbage out the door to suckers willing to pay $200 plus for a mobo that is a total POS.

    There is absolutely NO reason to release a defective hardware product today other than financial greed and/or technical incompetence. Hell most of the Asian mobo companies can't even make a friggin quality copy of a reference mobo from AMD or ATI so why would you expect them to deliver a properly functioning "performance mobo" priced at hundred of dollars more when they can't buy a clue?

    With any luck all of the slimy mobo makers will go tits-up soon and the real mobo companies will see an opportunity to provide quality mobos to the marketplace. At $200 a copy there is one Helleva incentive for honest, competent mobo companies to step forward and waste the Asian scum who are dumping crap into the marketplace. When a $200 plus mobo causes data corruption it's time for a massive class action lawsuit to end this consumer fraud and exploitation.

    Now is the time.
  • sdsdv10 - Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - link


    At $200 a copy there is one Helleva incentive for honest, competent mobo companies to step forward and waste the Asian scum who are dumping crap into the marketplace.

    Cornfedone, what major motherboard manufacturer isn't in Asia? It appears you are painting all the current companies with the same bruch, Asus, Gigabyte, abit... Who would be left to be the "honest, competent mobo companies"?
  • tuteja1986 - Sunday, February 25, 2007 - link

    Well Gigabyte GA-N680SL-DQ6 isn't even selling it. It will sale next month. They still have time to fix the bugs. Anyways i say buying the striker at launch for $400 was a foolish thing to do since it was buggy as hell. It took for them months to fix the problem. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now