TV is Changing

As we've mentioned before, the end game of convergence is pretty straightforward: access to all of your content, anywhere on any device.  In the early days of multimedia computing, all of your music and video content was stored on CE devices.  Cassette players gave way to CDs, VHS to DVDs, and of course there was always cable TV.  As PC technology grew faster and smarter, content began shifting from CE devices to PCs.  From MP3s and DivX movies to Youtube, some of the most used content these days can't even be played on run of the mill CE devices. 

Microsoft's approach plays out like this; you get content on the Internet through your PC, which is most likely running a Microsoft OS.  But the chain continues now with the Xbox 360, which can stream content from your PC to your TV.  Currently Microsoft limits the type of content you can stream from your PC to the 360 (it has to be WMV encoded), but there are 3rd party apps that will transcode from virtually every format to WMV for streaming to the 360. 

Xbox 360 users also have the option of downloading content off of the Xbox Live Marketplace, which as of the end of last year includes renting full length movies and buying TV shows.  As a game console, getting this content on your TV is as simple as downloading it. 

The final frontier for Microsoft however is attempting to control the cable TV market.  The PC market is already pretty much dominated by Microsoft, and the next-generation console race has left the Xbox 360 in the lead, leaving the TV/CE side of things untapped.  Microsoft has tried to break into the TV market in the past, with things such as Ultimate TV, but success by Microsoft's standards hasn't been in the cards.  With the possible transition to IPTV however, Microsoft feels that it has potential to control a big chunk of the market. 

Being able to control the platform which TV is delivered is most of what Microsoft's Xbox 360 IPTV announcement was about at this year's CES.  The idea is to leverage the current installed base of Xbox 360 consoles as potential customers for IPTV, which makes providers happy and gives Microsoft the marketshare it wants.  The final piece of the puzzle works like this: content that would normally appear on cable networks is delivered on an IPTV network (e.g. Verizon FIOS or AT&T U-Verse) to the Xbox 360, which then obviously ends up on your TV. 

At CES, Microsoft gave us a demonstration of the upcoming Xbox 360 IPTV solution which is supposed to be released sometime in 2007.  Enabling IPTV support on the 360 will be as simple as a software update that will add a Television button to the Media blade in the 360's UI. 

The 360's IPTV software is no different than Microsoft's current IPTV software, meaning it doesn't look like it's integrated with the 360's look and feel too much.  Launching the IPTV software takes a few seconds as it authenticates your hardware and account information, but afterwards it's a fully functional set-top box. One of the most tangible benefits of an IPTV solution is extremely fast channel switching, much faster than current digital cable offerings; Microsoft's IPTV implementation both on set-top boxes and the Xbox 360 can switch channels in 300 ms.


Microsoft's IPTV Interface launching on the 360

The goal here isn't to require Xbox 360's for each TV that you want to watch your IPTV on, but rather let you use your 360 as a set-top box if you happen to have one.  The 360  will function as a HD-DVR, recording at least two streams simultaneously.  You'll still be able to record a program and play a game at the same time, and while watching TV you still have access to your friends list and all of the other Xbox 360 navigational tools.  Microsoft's demonstration was seamless, you couldn't tell that the IPTV software was running on a Xbox 360 until you hit the Xbox button on the remote control. 

We asked Microsoft if you'd be able to use the 360 as a IPTV receiver even if the provider wasn't in your area, thereby introducing a significant amount of competition to the fairly monopolistic cable market.  Unfortunately, IPTV networks are designed to be managed networks, not simply video over the public Internet network, and thus your IPTV traffic will flow entirely within your ISP's network.  In other words, your IPTV provider needs to be in your area in order for you to get service.

Like any other cable TV service, there will be a cost associated with the Xbox 360's IPTV, but we'd expect it to be competitive with other options.  At first glance the technology sounds cooler than it actually is, after all, your 360 ends up being nothing more than a cable box at the end of the day.  But the real story is in what it turns your Xbox 360 into - a true media hub in your living room.  With IPTV support, the Xbox 360 would be able to play any content, whether it's on a TV network or on your PC, on whatever it's hooked up to.  It all but completes the digital home; taking that DVR'd content with you on the go would be the next step.

Index Apple's Approach
POST A COMMENT

15 Comments

View All Comments

  • Rock Hydra - Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - link

    quote:

    Apple ... buy Nintendo


    I hope not.
    Reply
  • archcommus - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    The article speaks largely about waiting for a company to do convergence perfectly, to combine the PC and TV seamlessly and easily. Am I missing something here or can I do this all on my own very easily? I don't own my own home, but if I did, I would have a server PC with all of my content, PCs in each room, a PC powering each TV (or monitor, same difference really), with gigabit ethernet connecting it all. Each PC powering a TV would of course have a tuner card installed and PVR software like SageTV. Bingo - every TV in my house can now watch live TV, function as a PVR/TiVo-like device, and also view content stored on any PC in my home since they're all on one LAN. I can also play my music, view my photos, and even browse the internet if I wanted at any TV in the house.

    There. Did I just solve the problem? :P I'm kidding of course, I just don't get what I'm missing here.
    Reply
  • Wellsoul2 - Thursday, January 18, 2007 - link

    IPTV-But you've got to pay..same old same old.

    Right now my cable is connected to my computer and I get over the air HDTV.
    My computer does DVR..all this with a cheap tuner card.

    Seems pretty lame to use an XBOX when you have a PC that can adjust the
    picture etc and play videos from Yahoo already.
    My TV is my second monitor already.

    Itunes downloaded stuff is ok for tv shows..movies are pricy.
    Reply
  • Araemo - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    "The real question is whether or not AMD will be able to put enough resources behind DTX to make it a widely accepted industry standard."

    You know, they really might not have to. Why? Same reason ATX actually caught on: Cases can be built VERY EASILY to support both DTX and ATX, or Mini-ITX and DTX.. allowing case manufacturers to hop on board for almost no cost.

    Motherboard manufacturers don't even have to wait for the cases to be available, since the DTX boards will fit on ATX cases... So I'd expect, if AMD doesn't piss anyone off, and makes nice with ASUS and the other tier-1 mobo manufacturers... smaller DTX boards might replace mini-ATX if they have any significant improvements. (What I'm trying to say is: What is the risk if ASUS makes their tiny board with only one PCI slot DTX or mini-ATX? There should be none, if the board was already designed to be that cheap and restricted for low costs... The board will still work in ATX cases so they can advertise it as dual compatibility.)
    Reply
  • RogueSpear - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    I DVR just about everything that I watch. With the amount of money I throw at Time Warner I feel justified in blowing past all of the commercials, plus I like to watch things when it's convenient to me. So can I keep on playing a game at full speed (or for that matter at all) while this thing is recording one or two HD streams? Or do I need to put the controller down because it's time to record The Office? Reply
  • glennpratt - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    Divx != Pirated; and vise versa Anand. I get the point, but that mentality doesn't help.

    If only it were easy to encode every movie and TV show I own or have recorded to a decent format and have everybody play it. But no! Movie companies want to throw a wrench in the works and software developers want to divide up the broken works into sovereign territories.
    Reply
  • PrinceGaz - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    In fact these days most pirated content is encoded with XviD rather than DivX. Admittedly there isn't really much difference between them as they are both implementations of MPEG4 ASP, and on a computer you can play back DivX encoded files using the XviD decoder and vice-versa. Reply
  • mino - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    Well, for the most part, I do NOT play the movies I bought! I just encode the to some high-quality XviD, put on home NAS and then play whenever I want (without all of the commercials and other things I paid for while not eanting them).

    AFAIK most friend do it this way so I really see no reason for going DRM...

    However that DTX thingie seems sweet. Especially combined with Fusion...
    Reply
  • Goty - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    If you look at the placement of the northbridge relative to the memory slots (find pictures elsewhere on the web for a full shot of the board), the CPU socket sits right between the two. What does this mean? This means that there's pretty much no way that this form factor will work with any CPU that doesn't utilize and onboard memory controller, i.e. this pretty much leaves Intel out of it. Reply
  • Araemo - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    Besides the fact that you can probably relocate both mobo and northbridge if your northbridge is your memory controller - Intel is moving to an on-die memory controller too, so that is fairly forward-thinking. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now