VoIP: Intel Partners with Skype

Pat got to introduce all of the cool things today as he announced their new partnership with Skype to improve performance on the latest Intel processors.

One major goal of Intel's with VoIP, isn't to just improve performance, but also to improve overall audio quality. Pat looked at VoIP as an opportunity to improve the quality of telephone conversations by a huge magnitude over the old Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN).

The reason for the improvement in quality is the move to a wider frequency band of audio thanks to VoIP rather than the very limited band that the PSTN operates over.

Index Multi-Core Everywhere


View All Comments

  • Guspaz - Thursday, August 25, 2005 - link

    A big deal was made over Microsoft Virtual Server's ability to move a virtual server to another physical box with no downtime. This is nothing new. Xen can alreay do this WITHOUT any special instruction extensions. As in, it can do it now, on any hardware.

    In addition, VMware's bluescreen demonstration is impressive until you realize that it too is nothing new; you can do the exact same thing on pretty much any virtualization solution, including older versions of VMware running on older hardware.
  • nullpointerus - Thursday, August 25, 2005 - link

    Intel's virtualization technology is impressive because it is done at the hardware level, not because it was never done before. Read the last three paragraphs of this:


    So Vanderpool and Pacifica can efficiently run multiple, unmodified operating systems at the same time.

    The blue screen thingy was a proof-of-concept showing that the Intel chip was working.
  • islandtechengineers - Sunday, August 28, 2005 - link

    There’s a good point. It could be an attempt to help get the word out with multi OS server machines. I’ve witnessed a group load of server machines that aren’t cost efficient as a multi server setup. If I remember correctly (I haven’t checked out VMWARE lately), vmware required a host platform to operate properly and this appears to be their step up. I think it’s a great idea to run their setup without an initial host / parent. Reply
  • tanekaha - Thursday, August 25, 2005 - link

    Changing processors improved the good hole hit rate from 20 to 70%
    Why ??
    Were the old processors getting the sums wrong?
    I can`t get my head round this.
    You`d think all ya needed was more time on old processors
    I`d appreciate enlightenment on this
  • Calin - Thursday, August 25, 2005 - link

    Yes, they were using the old Pentiums with error in FPU... (end sarcasm)
    I don't know for sure, but I think using processors that have more horsepower they can use more samples from previous holes. Some of these wells must be holed at a kilometer or more deep, and if one uses more sampling points in calculation, the results can be spectaculary better (or just as good, as this depends of lots of other factors).
    However, doubling the points might increase the computing load ten times or maybe more. So, the need for better computers.
  • ceefka - Saturday, August 27, 2005 - link

    Nice, if you still have to exploit Iraq (end sarcasm). Reply
  • jamawass - Wednesday, August 24, 2005 - link

    Will they have on chip memory controllers? Reply
  • ceefka - Saturday, August 27, 2005 - link

    All I saw on my quick read were massive on die L2/3 memory: 4 - 16MB and they are holding on to Hyperthreading. Reply
  • knitecrow - Wednesday, August 24, 2005 - link

    All these Code names are making my heard hurt Reply
  • Leper Messiah - Wednesday, August 24, 2005 - link

    so true...i'm confused as all hell when I read about sossaman, and tulsa and whichmacallit... Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now