News on the wire today is that Intel has rehired 28-year veteran Shlomit Weiss into the position of Senior VP and Co-General Manager of Intel’s Design Engineering Group (DEG), a position recently vacated by Uri Frank who left to head up Google’s SoC development. As reported in Tom’s Hardware and confirmed in her own LinkedIn announcement, Weiss will be working at Intel’s Israel design center alongside Sunil Shenoy and is ‘committed to ensuring that the company continues to lead in developing chips’. Weiss is the latest in an ever-growing list of ‘re-hiring’ Intel veterans, which leads to the problem that at some point Intel will run out of ex-employees to rehire and instead nurture internal talent for those roles.

In her first 28-year stint at Intel, Weiss is reported to have lead the team that developed both Intel Sandy Bridge and Intel Skylake, arguably two of the company’s most important processor families over the last decade: Sandy Bridge reaffirmed Intel’s lead in the market with a new base microarchitecture and continues in its 6+th generation in Comet Lake today, while Skylake has been Intel’s most profitable microarchitecture ever. Weiss also received Intel’s Achievement Award, the company’s highest offer, but is not listed as an Intel Fellow, while CRN reports that Weiss also founded the Intel Israel Women Forum in 2014. Weiss left Intel in September 2017 to join Mellanox/NVIDIA, where she held the role of Senior VP Silicon Engineering and ran the company’s networking chip design group.

In her new role at Intel, Tom’s is reporting that Weiss will lead all of Intel’s consumer chip development and design, while the other Co-GM of Intel DEG Sunil Shenoy will lead the data center design initiatives.

If you’ve been following the news of Intel’s personnel of late, you might start to learn a pattern:

  • Dec 20: Intel hires Masooma Bhaiwala (16-year AMD veteran)
  • Jan 21: Intel rehires Glenn Hinton (35-year Intel veteran, Senior Fellow)
  • Jan 27: Intel rehires Sunil Shenoy (33-year Intel veteran)
  • Jan 27: Intel hires Guido Appenzeller (various)
  • Feb 15: Intel rehires Pat Gelsinger (30-year Intel veteran)
  • Mar 17: Intel rehires Sanjay Natarajan (22-year veteran)
  • May 28: Intel hires Ali Ibrahim (13-year AMD veteran, Senior Fellow)
  • June 7: Intel hires Hong Hao (13-year Samsung veteran)
  • June 8: Intel rehires Stuart Pann (33-year Intel veteran)
  • June 8: Intel rehires Bob Brennan (22-year Intel veteran)
  • June 8: Intel hires Nick McKeown (27-year Stanford professor)
  • June 8: Intel hires Greg Lavender (35-year Sun/Citi/VMWare)
  • July 6: Intel rehires Shlomit Weiss (28-year Intel veteran)

Of these named hires (plenty of other people hired below the role of VP), seven are listed as ex-Intel employees being rehired into the company, mostly into engineering-focused positions. These ex-Intel engineers have a long line of accolades at the company, having worked on and built the fundamental technologies that power Intel today. The exact reasons why they left Intel in the first place are varied, with some peers are keen to cite brain drain during CEO Brian Krzanich’s tenure, however it would appear that the promise of working on fundamental next-generation hardware, along with popular CEO Pat Gelsinger, is enough of an allure to get them to return.

It should be noted however that number of engineers that Intel could rehire is limited – going after key personnel critical to Intel’s growth in the last few decades, despite their lists of successful products and accolades, can’t be the be-all and end-all of Intel’s next decade of growth. If we’re strictly adhering to typical retirement ages as well, a number of them will soon be at that level within the next ten years. Intel can’t keep rehiring veteran talent into key positions to get to the next phase in its product evolution – at some level it has to reignite the initial passion from within.

Intel’s key personnel are often home-grown, or what we call ‘lifers’, who spend 20+ years of the company typically straight out of university or college – every rehire on this list fits into this image, especially CEO Pat Gelsinger, and a number of contacts I have within the company are identical. However if Intel is having to rehire those who enabled former glory for the company, one has to wonder exactly what is going on such that talent already within the company isn’t stepping up. At some point these veterans will retire, and Intel will be at a crossroads. In a recent interview with former Intel SVP Jim Keller, he stated that (paraphrased) ‘building a chip design team at a company depends on volume – you hire in if you don’t have the right people, but if you have a team of 1000, then there are people there and it’s a case of finding the right ones’. In a company of 110000 employees, it seems odd that Intel feels it has to rehire to fill those key roles. Some might question if those rehires would have left in the first place if Intel’s brain drain had never occurred, but it poses an interesting question nonetheless.

Source: Tom’s Hardware, CRN
Image: LinkedIn

Related Reading

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • ET - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    Intel can continue this practice indefinitely. All they need is to occasionally let some veterans go in order to rehire them a while later.
  • Sahrin - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    "This product sucks, you're fired."

    One product cycle later.

    "Shit, the products we are making now are still crap - hire them back!"

    One product cycle later.

    "This product sucks, you're fired."

    What Intel fails to realize is, it's their abusive business practices that make all this happen. Until they wake up to the reality that they can't simply buy away the competition, they're going to keep going through these boom and bust cycles.

    Intel's problem has been and always will be not engineering but rather a failure of business strategy. They have 'engineered' the company to fail, as it were. Until they wake up to this reality and divert their focus from beating AMD at all costs to making the best products at any cost - they will never find sustained success.

    This is true for all companies, by the way - even AMD. Intel is just a particularly egregious example that has invested about 10x what they do in engineering in market manipulation.

    They could be the most valuable tech firm in the world. Instead they have spent ~$40B on share buybacks since 2019.

    Incompetent, profit-driven leadership is what kills equity value. Not overinvestment in R&D.
  • whatthe123 - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    They definitely didn't fire these people, they left because of the poor leadership at intel. If anything intel has been awful at trimming the fat. Wasn't until last year that they started getting rid of dead weight.

    Short term this is probably going to help intel a lot, but I have to agree that intel needs to go back to promoting from within and giving attention to internal talent, otherwise they're just going to leave like these veterans did.
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, July 8, 2021 - link

    The corporation is a plutocratic/regressive wealth redistribution mechanism. It is not altruism.

    There are enough shiny toys that fall out to placate the masses, while the true costs are borne by the ‘public domain’ not the profiteers.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, July 12, 2021 - link

    That's a whole lotta buzzwords to say "they're rich and I dont like that"
  • mode_13h - Tuesday, July 13, 2021 - link

    : )
  • shabby - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    Will they be rehiring the Prescott team also?
  • mode_13h - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    I could swear they did. I thought maybe Gelsinger was the one who was involved with the P4, so I checked his wikipedia page and didn't find that, but noticed this tidbit:

    "In 2013, Gelsinger co-founded Transforming the Bay with Christ (TBC), a coalition of business leaders, venture capitalists, non-profit leaders and pastors aiming to convert one million people over the next decade."

    Sounds like good times for Christians at Intel! I see the diversity page on their website doesn't say anything about religious diversity.
  • 29a - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

  • FunBunny2 - Thursday, July 8, 2021 - link

    just what we need:
    - Right Wing corporate zealots
    - Right Wing religious zealots

    rolled up together. the Founding Fathers were explicitly anti-religion with respect to governance. structured lying and inculcation to the hoi polloi. "Stop the Steal".

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now