Power Delivery Thermal Analysis

A lot more focus has been put on power delivery specifications and capabilities, not just by manufacturers but as a result of users' demands. In addition to the extra power benefits from things like overclocking, more efficient designs in power deliveries and cooling solutions aim to bring temperatures down. Although this isn't something most users ever need to worry about, certain enthusiasts are bringing more focus onto each board's power delivery. The more premium models tend to include bigger and higher-grade power deliveries, with bigger and more intricate heatsink designs, with some even providing water blocks, while others are spending more just to make sure the most efficient parts on the market are being used.


The 16-phase power delivery on the ASUS ROG Maximus XIII Hero (operating at teamed 7+1)

Testing Methodology

Our method of testing is if the power delivery and its heatsink are effective at dissipating heat. We do this by running an intensely heavy CPU workload for a prolonged method of time. We apply an overclock which is deemed safe and at the maximum that the silicon on our testbed processor allows. We then run the Prime95 with AVX2 enabled under a torture test for an hour at the maximum stable overclock we can which puts insane pressure on the processor. We collect our data via three different methods which include the following:

  • Taking a thermal image from a birds-eye view after an hour with a Flir Pro thermal imaging camera
  • Securing two probes on to the rear of the PCB, right underneath CPU VCore section of the power delivery for better parity in case a probe reports a faulty reading
  • Taking a reading of the VRM temperature from the sensor reading within the HWInfo monitoring application

The reason for using three different methods is that some sensors can read inaccurate temperatures, which can give very erratic results for users looking to gauge whether an overclock is too much pressure for the power delivery handle. With using a probe on the rear, it can also show the efficiency of the power stages and heatsinks as a wide margin between the probe and sensor temperature can show that the heatsink is dissipating heat and that the design is working, or that the internal sensor is massively wrong. To ensure our probe was accurate before testing, I binned 10 and selected the most accurate (within 1c of the actual temperature) for better parity in our testing.

To recreate a real-world testing scenario, the system is built into a conventional desktop chassis which is widely available. This is to show and alleviate issues when testing on open testbeds which we have done previously, which allows natural airflow to flow over the power delivery heatsinks. It provides a better comparison for the end-user and allows us to mitigate issues where heatsinks have been designed with airflow in mind, and those that have not. The idea of a heatsink is to allow effective dissipation of heat and not act as an insulator, with much more focus from consumers over the last couple of years on power delivery componentry and performance than in previous years.

For thermal imaging, we use a Flir One camera to indicate where the heat is generated around the socket area, as some designs use different configurations and an evenly spread power delivery with good components will usually generate less heat. Manufacturers who use inefficient heatsinks and cheap out on power delivery components should run hotter than those who have invested. Of course, a $700 flagship motherboard is likely to outperform a cheaper $100 model under the same testing conditions, but it is still worth testing to see which vendors are doing things correctly. 

Thermal Analysis Results


We measured 53.3ºC on the hottest part of the CPU socket during our testing

The ASUS ROG Maximus XIII Hero is using a 16-phase power delivery using teamed power stages, with an Intersil ISL69269 PWM controller operating at 7+1. ASUS's power stage of choice for the CPU VCore section is the Texas Instruments 95410RR 90 SPS and includes fourteen of them teamed in pairs. For the SoC section, there's two slightly lower grade Texas Instruments 59880 70 A power stages. Cooling the large power delivery is a large and weighty L-shaped VRM heatsink, which is interconnected via a heat pipe, and should, in theory, keep the power delivery running cool even with heavier CPU overclocks.

Taking a look at our VRM thermal testing results on Z590 models tested so far, the ASUS ROG Maximus XIII Hero performs brilliantly against the competition. We saw the lowest temperatures so far, with a reading of just 55ºC from the integrated thermal sensor. This is backed up by the readings from our pair of K-type Thermocouples with readings of 52ºC and 54ºC respectively, and again, is backed up by our FLIR thermal imaging camera which measured 53.3ºC on the hottest part of the power plane.

While a lot of models tested so far have dumped the majority of the heat into the power plane around the power delivery, the Hero is effectively drawing heat out via the large heatsinks and is also aided by the efficient 16-phase (7+1) teamed power delivery.

Overall it's a fantastic result for ASUS and shows the true efficiency and design prowess of ROG's R&D team.

Overclocking ASUS ROG Maximus XIII Hero Conclusion
Comments Locked

28 Comments

View All Comments

  • A5 - Friday, July 9, 2021 - link

    $500 isn't mid-range by any stretch of the imagination, except in the wildest dreams of ASUS' CFO.
  • shabby - Friday, July 9, 2021 - link

    Lol indeed, wake up Gavin.
  • Ian Cutress - Friday, July 9, 2021 - link

    It's in ASUS' 'mid-range' 😉
  • eastcoast_pete - Friday, July 9, 2021 - link

    Which keeps many of us looking at manufacturers who haven't lost touch with reality. Now, if they'd throw in a 3060 for $ 1, I'd buy one in a heartbeat.
  • shabby - Saturday, July 10, 2021 - link

    Oh ok, guess my asus x570 gaming plus wifi is in the poor range section...

    $100 homeless range
    $200 poor range
    $300 low end
    $500 mid range
    $800 high end
    $1000 baller range
  • lilkwarrior - Monday, July 12, 2021 - link

    That's actually a pretty accurate scale. $500 being mid-range more than makes sense–especially with 4K-oriented workflows these motherboards are increasingly catering too. All prices of PC components are rising to also account for increased tariffs, demand, & so on.

    If you want a motherboard with Thunderbolt 4, multiple M.2 slots, & Wifi6E, you should absolutely expect a price around $500 these days.
  • Makaveli - Friday, July 9, 2021 - link

    The AMD Hero's boards also in the same price range so not surprised. But I choose to be a hero to my wallet and choose a board in the $300-$350 price range. For me if i'm spending $500 on a motherboard it will be for a build using ECC memory.
  • Exodite - Saturday, July 10, 2021 - link

    Just got myself a Gigabyte B550 Vision D-P for that reason (ECC support) and it was half that. :)

    Looking at the current Intel and AMD platforms I see little reason to choose X570 over B550, you pretty much have to need the chipset PCIe 4.0, and none to choose Z590 over B560.

    Pricing seem more out of hand on Intel than AMD though, generally speaking. There are decently priced X570 boards here in Sweden but Z590 is hard to get with reasonable specs sub-$500.
  • Destoya - Sunday, July 11, 2021 - link

    I bought my Crosshair VI Hero for $249 new. It's only in the last couple of generations that these companies have decided to inflate the prices to ludicrous amounts.
  • Spunjji - Monday, July 12, 2021 - link

    They've cottoned on to that segment of users that think something is inherently better just because they spent more money on it 🤷‍♂️

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now