Advanced Synthetic Tests

Our benchmark suite includes a variety of tests that are less about replicating any real-world IO patterns, and more about exposing the inner workings of a drive with narrowly-focused tests. Many of these tests will show exaggerated differences between drives, and for the most part that should not be taken as a sign that one drive will be drastically faster for real-world usage. These tests are about satisfying curiosity, and are not good measures of overall drive performance. For more details, please see the overview of our 2021 Consumer SSD Benchmark Suite.

Whole-Drive Fill

Pass 1
Pass 2

On the first pass starting from an empty drive, the WD Black SN850's SLC cache handles sequential writes at a bit over 5GB/s and the cache lasts for about 281GB before running out. That's a very large SLC cache size for a TLC drive, which is probably why performance is so variable after the cache is full. For the second pass of sequential writes, the cache size has been reduced to about 20GB, but the drive shows a second burst of 20GB of SLC-speed writes later in the test.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Average Throughput for last 16 GB Overall Average Throughput

The aggressive SLC caching behavior on the SN850 comes at the cost of slower and less-consistent post-cache write performance, but Western Digital's earlier WD Black SSDs already behaved quite well here. The SN850 manages to keep write speed from ever dropping below 1GB/s, and the overall average across the entire drive fill is basically the same as the SN730, the OEM relative to the SN750 but with the same newer flash as the SN850.

On the second sequential write pass when the SN850's variable-size SLC cache is already at its smallest, post-cache performance is extremely consistent and faster than any other TLC SSD we have tested, but still 15% slower than the MLC-based Samsung 970 PRO.

Working Set Size

Most high-end drives have boring and steady results on this test since they don't skimp on DRAM. The QD1 random read latency for the SN850 is better than any other TLC drive we've tested, and only 4% slower than the MLC-based Samsung 970 PRO.

Performance vs Block Size

Random Read
Random Write
Sequential Read
Sequential Write

The WD Black SN850 is strongly optimized for 4kB IOs, with lower IOPS and throughput for sub-4kB block sizes on all four workloads. None of the other drives show such broad preferences for 4kB block sizes, but some of Western Digital's drives and a few others show this behavior on at least some of the workloads. This tuning pays off in some places, such as the SN850's leading random write performance for small block sizes (which is followed by the SLC cache running out while testing larger block random writes). There are some other weaknesses including poor performance for small-block sequential reads, but more importantly it has great performance for sequential reads with larger block sizes.

Synthetic Tests: Basic IO Patterns Mixed IO Performance and Idle Power Management
POST A COMMENT

82 Comments

View All Comments

  • Chaitanya - Thursday, March 18, 2021 - link

    Very interesting drive. Reply
  • bernstein - Thursday, March 18, 2021 - link

    great review! thanks @anandtech Reply
  • abufrejoval - Thursday, March 18, 2021 - link

    Somehow I think that I'll never be able to recover in the faster response times of this drive the time it would take me to swap it against the 980 Pro I currently have in my Ryzen 5800X workstation...

    Against any other with similar price and capacity, it would win. In absolute terms, I doubt it really matters for most, because the bottleneck will be somewhere else.
    Reply
  • abufrejoval - Thursday, March 18, 2021 - link

    actually an MLC 970 pro... need edit Reply
  • XabanakFanatik - Thursday, March 18, 2021 - link

    I was going to say.... Seems like this is a better performing drive than the 980 Pro. 970 pro, it's a close call. The upside is this ca be had in 2TB Reply
  • bji - Friday, March 19, 2021 - link

    If you swap it at a time when you otherwise would not be using the computer, then you effectively don't have to "recover" anything. Reply
  • Spunjji - Friday, March 19, 2021 - link

    No, but that's an odd way to look at it. There's no need to replace a perfectly good drive! Reply
  • Linustechtips12#6900xt - Thursday, March 18, 2021 - link

    I think that this is. a decent drive after skimming threw the article but i definitely do wonder how far the M.2 standard will be in use obviously a while im not saying its obsolete but when U.3 exists. I think that 2.5in drives will make a come back because in all honesty you cant fit everything on a 2tb drive and capacity that high is EXPENSIVE so i think 2.5in U.3 is gonna be where its at and im gonna wait for it to, i wanna get something better than a hdd for my game storage but when sata is going out i dont wanna buy a sata ssd. Reply
  • eva02langley - Thursday, March 18, 2021 - link

    The playstation 5 use NVMe, so it is going to be around for a while. SATA is definitely dead. Reply
  • futrtrubl - Thursday, March 18, 2021 - link

    Don't confuse NVMe and M.2. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now