Battery Life

Although the Pixel 5 is a small phone, Google still managed to with a rather large 4080mAh battery – which notable given the 151g weight of the device. Coupled with a 1080p 90Hz screen which seems to be of good quality, the Pixel 5 should do alright in the battery tests.

Web Browsing Battery Life 2016 (WiFi)

Indeed, in our web-browsing test, the Pixel 5 ended up lasting 12.5h, which is an excellent result for a device of this calibre. The phone seems to be significantly more efficient than the Pixel 4 XL last year, and it also does better than even some newer flagships this year which use less power-efficient displays.

PCMark Work 2.0 - Battery Life

In the more SoC power dominant PCMark battery test, the Pixel 5 also does very well at 11.1h runtime. The similar-specced LG Velvet beats it, but only due to a larger battery as well as a 60Hz display.

In general, the Pixel 5 does very well in terms of battery life and it seems to be amongst the most power-optimised devices in the market – usually small phones have to compromise on battery life compared to their larger battery siblings, however the Pixel 5 here does not.

It’s actually a stark contrast to last year’s Pixel 4 devices which had large power consumption issues – whatever compromises Google had to make, such as a different SoC, dropping Project Soli, or just overall power optimisations, it seems to have worked well in favour of the Pixel 5.

GPU Performance Camera - A Quick Recap
POST A COMMENT

99 Comments

View All Comments

  • shabby - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    So after looking at the chart it's $200 more for 2gb of ram, 90hz screen, ip68 rating, wireless charging and headphone jack deletion? Go home Google you're drunk. Reply
  • cbm80 - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    It's a luxury product for people who don't care about price. Reply
  • Operandi - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    That might be ok if had the look and feel of a high-end phone but its plastic, at least what you touch and feel is. BTW Google if you want wireless charging but want to avoid glass there are all kinds of materials that would work; carbon fiber, Kevlar, wood, maybe even ceramic all of which would look and feel better than plastic.

    I like what Google tries to do with the Pixel phones but the 5 is pretty disappointing.
    Reply
  • MattMe - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    I bought a Pixel 5 a couple weeks back and have to say I much prefer the feel of this over other glass devices I've used recently. It's contoured nicely, is a good size and the textured resin material feels very firm with a nice textured feel to it. It certainly doesn't feel cheap at all, but it does feel more robust meaning I'm less concerned about it cracking or smashing like many glass-backed devices I've owned. Reply
  • BedfordTim - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    I will agree, but glass devices are easily fixed with a case. Reply
  • vuvaldi - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    If you would put a case on the look or feel of the material doesn't matter, and glass is heavier than plastic so plastic wins clearly here. Reply
  • BedfordTim - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    I fully agree that plastic is a far more sensible material for phones. To me design peaked with the Nokia 735. Unfortunately all the best phones now have a glass back and rather than reject them, there is a partial work around. Reply
  • at_clucks - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    With a *plastic* case. So just pretend there's glass under the Pixel's and that plastic case, you just never want to take it down and look. Fixed it for you.

    This whole "glass=premium feel" thing was started by reviewers who ran out of things to write and just bought the hype from manufacturers that glass must be something awesome. On the other hand reading reviews of plastic phones made you think touching them will give you the plague. By the time they figured out how fragile the phone gets most people were already trained that glass=premium and manufacturers were happy to deliver on it.

    We ended up having super fragile phones that have to be wrapped in armored cases just to survive. We never see their back once we take them out of the box and slap on the case but deep down inside we live with that warm fuzzy feeling that they're premium underneath.

    Plastic is just fine and cheaper. It can be made too feel pleasant and sturdy, certainly more so than glass. Whoever had a Lumia 1020 can confirm just how nice that polycarbonate casing was, no case needed. And plastic is cheaper so you can have a phone that's just as good but lighter and cheaper.
    Reply
  • DougMcC - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    +1000. Gimme unbreakable phone so I don't have to add an extra 25% weight case. I couldn't care less what material it's made of. Reply
  • patel21 - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    +100k
    Give me a phone like S7 Active. And no need for even a screen protector.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now