Today alongside with the launch of the Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing Edition, Qualcomm is announcing the new Snapdragon 768G SoC which powers the device. The new SoC is a direct follow-up to the Snapdragon 765G announced last December, and the two chips are very likely the same silicon design, with the new variant increasing the clock frequencies.

Qualcomm Snapdragon Premium SoCs 2019-2020
SoC Snapdragon 768G Snapdragon 765
Snapdragon 765G
Snapdragon 730
CPU 1x Cortex A76
@ 2.8GHz

1x Cortex-A76
@ 2.4GHz

6x Cortex-A55
@ 1.8GHz
1x Cortex A76
@ 2.3GHz (non-G)
@ 2.4GHz (765G)

1x Cortex-A76
@ 2.2GHz

6x Cortex-A55
@ 1.8GHz
2x Cortex-A76
@ 2.2GHz
 
6x Cortex-A55
@ 1.8GHz
GPU Adreno 620
+15% perf over 765G
Adreno 620
+20% perf (non-G)
+38% perf (765G)
Adreno 618
DSP / NPU Hexagon 696
HVX + Tensor

5.4TOPS AI
(Total CPU+GPU+HVX+Tensor)
Hexagon 688
HVX + Tensor
Memory
Controller
2x 16-bit CH

@ 2133MHz LPDDR4X / 17.0GB/s
2x 16-bit CH

@ 1866MHz LPDDR4X 14.9GB/s
ISP/Camera Dual 14-bit Spectra 355 ISP

1x 192MP or 36MP with ZSL
or
2x 22MP with ZSL
Dual Spectra 350 ISP

1x 36MP with ZSL
or
2x 22MP with ZSL
Encode/
Decode
2160p30, 1080p120
H.264 & H.265

10-bit HDR pipelines
Integrated Modem Snapdragon X52 Integrated

(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 1200 Mbps
4x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
UL = 210 Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

(5G NR Sub-6 4x4 100MHz
+ mmWave 2x2 400MHz)
DL = 3700 Mbps
UL = 1600 Mbps
Snapdragon X15 LTE

(Category 15/13)
DL = 800Mbps
3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
UL = 150Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 64-QAM
Mfc. Process Samsung
7nm EUV (7LPP)
Samsung
8nm (8LPP)

The new chip features the same Cortex-A76 cores in a 1+1 configuration (one Prime high-clocked core, and one medium clocked core), alongside 6 Cortex-A55 cores. The difference in CPU performance lies in the frequencies of the big cores which are now at up to 2.8GHz and 2.4GHz for the Performance and Middle core – a more notable uplift from the 2.4 and 2.2GHz clocks of the Snapdragon 765G.

GPU clock frequencies have also been increased, resulting in at 15% performance boost over the Snapdragon 765.

The rest of the chip is seemingly identical to the Snapdragon 765 series. What’s interesting here is that Qualcomm does name it quite differently in its SKU line-up. While it very much shares the design of the Snapdragon 765, it’s also a possibility that it’s a silicon respin of the chip, the timelines certainly would make sense and it’s also not the first time that Qualcomm would have done this (Snapdragon 821 is an example of this). If the increased clocks come at a cost of higher power draw or loss of efficiency is anybody’s guess right now – there’s also the possibility that yields on Samsung’s 7LPP node has improved and thus enabled the higher frequencies.

Related Reading:

POST A COMMENT

33 Comments

View All Comments

  • yeeeeman - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    I want 5Ghz as my 9900k Reply
  • hary232 - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    +1 Reply
  • close - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    I guess then it would cost $500 and be slower than the competition. Reply
  • Deicidium369 - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    What competition? The cheap Chinese knockoffs AMD? Reply
  • Thud2 - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    Wow. Biased, Delusional and out of touch much? Reply
  • kobblestown - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    Well, it supports 5G, doesn't it?! ;) Reply
  • Wilco1 - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    You don't need anywhere near 5GHz to beat a 9900K. Eg. A13 has the same performance at 2.6Ghz, almost half the frequency!

    The same microarchitecture as Cortex-A76 is used in Graviton 2 and Ampere Altra which beat ridiculously expensive Xeon chips by a huge margin, all without needing 5GHz and while using far less power.

    5GHz = huge, expensive, power hungry chips which are easily beaten by smarter designs. Stupity, all driven by marketing rather than good engineering.
    Reply
  • eek2121 - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    This is a popular misconception that needs to die. Reply
  • Kangal - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    Which part?
    The old AMD Bulldozer parts clock insanely high, yet they get outpaced by simple Core i3's and probably some ARM SoC's too.

    Frequency is important, but so is IPC, and so is efficiency, and so are drivers/software, etc etc....
    Reply
  • willis936 - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    Every part? Coffee lake has a 19 stage pipeline, 22 execution units (up to 4 per operation type), and 1 MB of L3 per core.

    A76 has a 13 stage pipeline, 8 execution units, and 1 MB per core. Where is the supposed magic gain in IPC?

    https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/intel/microarchitectu...

    https://wikimili.com/en/ARM_Cortex-A76
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now