Power Delivery Thermal Analysis

One of the most requested elements of our motherboard reviews revolves around the power delivery and its componentry. Aside from the quality of the components and its capability for overclocking to push out higher clock speeds which in turn improves performance, is the thermal capability of the cooling solutions implemented by manufacturers. While almost always fine for users running processors at default settings, the cooling capability of the VRMs isn't something that users should worry too much about, but for those looking to squeeze out extra performance from the CPU via overclocking, this puts extra pressure on the power delivery and in turn, generates extra heat. This is why more premium models often include heatsinks on its models with better cooling designs, heftier chunks of metal, and in some cases, even with water blocks such as the ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Formula.


Two K-Type Thermal Probes attached to the rear of the power delivery on the ASUS ROG Zenith II Extreme

Testing Methodology

Out method of testing out if the power delivery and its heatsink are effective at dissipating heat, is by running an intensely heavy CPU workload for a prolonged method of time. We apply an overclock which is deemed safe and at the maximum that the silicon on our AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X processor allows. We then run the Prime95 with AVX2 enabled under a torture test for an hour at the maximum stable overclock we can which puts insane pressure on the processor. We collect our data via three different methods which include the following:

  • Taking a thermal image from a birds-eye view after an hour with a Flir Pro thermal imaging camera
  • Securing two probes on to the rear of the PCB, right underneath CPU VCore section of the power delivery for better parity in case a probe reports a faulty reading
  • Taking a reading of the VRM temperature from the sensor reading within the HWInfo monitoring application

The reason for using three different methods is that some sensors can read inaccurate temperatures, which can give very erratic results for users looking to gauge whether an overclock is too much pressure for the power delivery handle. With using a probe on the rear, it can also show the efficiency of the power stages and heatsinks as a wide margin between the probe and sensor temperature can show that the heatsink is dissipating heat and that the design is working, or that the internal sensor is massively wrong. To ensure our probe was accurate before testing, I binned 10 and selected the most accurate (within 1c of the actual temperature) for better parity in our testing.

For thermal image, we use a Flir One camera as it gives a good indication of where the heat is generated around the socket area, as some designs use different configurations and an evenly spread power delivery with good components will usually generate less heat. Manufacturers who use inefficient heatsinks and cheap out on power delivery components should run hotter than those who have invested. Of course, a $700 flagship motherboard is likely to outperform a cheaper $100 model under the same testing conditions, but it is still worth testing to see which vendors are doing things correctly.

Thermal Analysis Results


We measured 51.4 °C on the hottest part of the board during our testing; the RAM slots.

The ASUS ROG Zenith II Extreme is using a 16-phase power delivery with sixteen Infineon TDA21472 70 A power stages operating in teamed mode. This is possible due to ASUS using an ASP1405I PWM controller which is running in 8+0 mode. This is a rebranded IR35201 PWM controller, but specifically designed and used by ASUS. Cooling the large 16-phase power delivery is a large aluminium heatsink which connects the large rear panel cover for improved cooling properties. Attached to the heatsink is a pair of custom Delta Superflo fans which are designed to spin up when the power delivery hits 60°C and above. This can be altered within the firmware, but actively cooled heatsinks on a model as powerful as this is a good sign that ASUS is focusing on this area. The backplate does add some thermal properties to the rear of the power delivery and has a large surface to allow systems with good passive cooling further bolster the thermal properties. 

Our testing shows the ASUS ROG Zenith II Extreme to have the best power delivery thermals from any TRX40 model we've tested so far. This can be attributed to the pair of cooling fans directly on the power delivery, the large heatsink, and the backplate which all help to reduce operating temperatures. The design is also good in the way that ASUS has teamed the power stages together in pairs which should also help to reduce temperatures over models that use doublers. We got readings of 45°C on the integrated sensor and 42°C from our external K-type probe. This shows the ASUS ROG Zenith II Extremes power delivery cooling to be very effective, and in terms of the competition, is around 10°c cooler than the MSI Creator TRX40. This is very good.

Threadripper 3970X Overclocking ASUS ROG Zenith II Extreme Conclusion
POST A COMMENT

21 Comments

View All Comments

  • mark625 - Monday, December 23, 2019 - link

    "The ASUS ROG Zenith II Extreme is the predecessor of the previous generation of X399"

    Shouldn't it be the successor, and not the predecessor? Unless it also has a flux capacitor in there somewhere....
    Reply
  • The_Assimilator - Tuesday, December 24, 2019 - link

    It should be, but AnandTech should also do basic proofreading, and we know how that goes. Reply
  • Korguz - Tuesday, December 24, 2019 - link

    then feel free to go some where else if it bothers you that much. Reply
  • flyingpants265 - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    I guess we should never, ever, ever complain about anything, then. Reply
  • tech6 - Monday, December 23, 2019 - link

    Why use the "Republic Of Gamers" moniker on something that clearly is not designed for gaming? Reply
  • Xyler94 - Monday, December 23, 2019 - link

    ROG typically is for Asus's top end consumer products. Yes, I agree they should probably use something else for these super CPUs, but everyone knows Republic of Gamers as being top tier, so Asus... probably to save marketing costs, just use it. Reply
  • Slash3 - Monday, December 23, 2019 - link

    The board also features a full assortment of overclocking options in the BIOS in addition to features such as dual BIOS, on-board power, reset, CMOS clear and safe boot buttons, RGB controls and good VRM cooling and componentry, etc. It's capable of gaming as well as workstation tasks, in keeping with the Threadripper's strange origins as a side project for power users. Reply
  • eek2121 - Monday, December 23, 2019 - link

    People said that about the 1950X as well. Yet I game at 4k60 all day long (when I'm not doing other stuff that I purchased the processor for). Reply
  • zorxd - Monday, December 23, 2019 - link

    it works just fine, but you just don't get as much performance as with a much cheaper CPU with less cores but higher frequency (better performance with 8 or less threads) Reply
  • GreenReaper - Monday, December 23, 2019 - link

    Hoping to benefit from the goodwill associated with the Republic in Star Wars? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now