Conclusion

The Toshiba/Kioxia BG4 is a rather specialized SSD, intended for thin and light systems that need to maximize battery life and conserve internal volume. It's an OEM-only product that isn't in direct competition with most retail SSDs, which are unfortunately most of what we have to compare against the BG4. But the BG4 isn't an obscure low-volume part; it's being used in flagship models by some of the top notebook OEMs. So even though it will be hard to buy an individual BG4 SSD, it's not hard to find it in the field. With trend-setting OEMs moving to smaller SSD form factors, the BG4 is part of a growing market segment.

Looking purely at performance, the BG4 is nothing special. It meets our expectations for an entry-level NVMe SSD in a largely post-SATA market, but doesn't raise the bar much. Peak performance isn't as high as some entry-level drives, but the worst-case performance from the BG4 is typically not as bad as from many entry-level drives. The BG4 is a clear improvement from the previous-generation BG3 (OEM) and RC100 (retail) for performance, but those older drives were definitely on the slow side even at release.

To cut costs and save space, the BG4 is a DRAMless SSD that relies on the NVMe Host Memory Buffer (HMB) feature to help with the performance problems a DRAMless design usually brings. HMB doesn't completely eliminate the downsides of a DRAMless SSD, but it means that the worst-case performance only shows up in corner cases that are not relevant to typical client usage patterns.

To see what really makes the BG4 special, we have to focus on size and power consumption. The former is pretty much self-explanatory, as the BG4 puts a 1TB SSD on a removable card barely larger than a postage stamp. Meanwhile in terms of power consumption, the BG4's small physical size requires it to strictly limit peak power consumption, and that holds back performance on some tests. But its performance per Watt is usually excellent. The BG4 sets numerous records on our efficiency scores, and some of those records are far better than anything we've previously tested.

When we tested Toshiba's XG5 and XG6 high-end client NVMe SSDs, we thought that they deserved retail versions. They offer good performance and did so with power efficiency that no retail NVMe drives at the time could match. The BG4 is probably better off staying as an OEM-only product. Its greatest strengths are simply not that important to most buyers of retail NVMe drives. The systems that really need the low power and small size of the BG4 only account for a small portion of the market, and almost all of those systems start out with at least a half-decent low power SSD. For devices with a bit of battery capacity to spare, there are cheap options that give better performance than the BG4.

However, within its niche, the BG4 is clearly superior to everything else we have tested. There's nothing on the retail market in any form factor that offers the power efficiency of the BG4, and for this reason it's not surprising that the BG4 is going to become an increasingly common feature of thin and light laptops, where vendors are always looking to save on space and power. The fact that the BG4 can't keep up with high-end M.2 2280 NVMe SSDs doesn't matter because it's plenty fast enough for a system where the CPU is also under severe power and thermal limits. The BG4 beats SATA performance and delivers a combination high density and low power that few vendors can compete with.

Power Management
Comments Locked

31 Comments

View All Comments

  • intelati - Friday, October 18, 2019 - link

    That last image is absolutely ridiculous. You get good performing 1TB of SSD storage on a postage stand.

    Jesus H Christ.
  • MaxUserName - Friday, October 18, 2019 - link

    No, BG4 have too poor performance:
    https://www.storagereview.com/toshiba_bg4_nvme_ssd...
  • Ratman6161 - Friday, October 18, 2019 - link

    I took a quick look at your link but quit looking when I saw they were testing SQL Server as one of their tests and with 15,000 virtual users. Completely useless use case. Even if you are are a software developer running a local copy of SQL Server, you won't be testing 15K users. So its performance somewhat pales in comparison to many full size m.2 SSD's. There are trade-offs to every component and in a laptop, particularly a thin and light laptop, those trade-offs usually have to favor saving space and power efficiency. It accomplishes those two goals on its own plus the smaller size may enable a larger battery in some systems. so what if your 2 TB 970 Evo outperforms it. The people buying the systems where this would be used won't care. It seems pretty ideally suited to its target audience.
  • Tams80 - Friday, October 18, 2019 - link

    I second that being a silly review.
    This is, as the article here states multiple times, for space-constrained devices. The BG4 more than meets the needs of these. As a bonus to us as customers, it means manufacturers are less likely to solder down the SSDs, so we can actually replace/upgrade them.
  • 0ldman79 - Wednesday, November 13, 2019 - link

    We're looking at a review right now.

    It's not as fast as NVME but it's faster than SATA on most benchmarks.

    It's a quarter size of most NVME drives.
  • svan1971 - Saturday, October 19, 2019 - link

    Lord, learn how to spell stamp, amen.
  • wenart - Sunday, October 20, 2019 - link

    Does Jesus have a second name?
  • Jambe - Thursday, October 24, 2019 - link

    Hieronymus, obviously.
  • ToTTenTranz - Friday, October 18, 2019 - link

    The Smach-Z uses a 2230 M.2 NVMe slot.

    Just saying.
  • Kishoreshack - Friday, October 18, 2019 - link

    Excellent review
    deep dive into the ssd we will get in our laptops
    I just hope these form factors become common
    &
    are adopted for every laptop

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now