Dell Latitude D600: Construction - Build, Appearance, Size

The Latitude D600 has been on the market for sometime now, though recently, it has undergone a slight refresh due to the Dothan introduction. Design-wise, it is basically the same D600 that we have known from the Banias platform.

Click to enlarge.

The D600 follows the scheme of other Dell notebooks with angled down speakers and a single securing clip in the center. The speaker quality is what we expect in a business notebook - pretty much average. We should note that this is not meant to function in a multimedia capacity.

Click to enlarge.

Left side (left to right):
  • PCMCIA slot
  • SmartCard slot
  • IR port
  • Microphone port
  • Headphone port
  • Kensington lock port

Click to enlarge.

Back side:
  • 2 USB 2.0 ports
  • S-video port
  • modem jack
  • Gigabit Ethernet port
  • Parallel port
  • VGA-out port
  • Serial port
  • Power port
  • Exhaust vent

Click to enlarge.

Right side:
  • Kensington lock port
  • Multibay

Click to enlarge.

The D600 measures in at 12.4" x 10.1" x 1.2" and weighs in at about 5.3 lbs (with optical drive and 6-cell battery). It has a nice hard casing that is fairly resistant to scratching; though, make no mistake, it isn't scratch-proof.

Click to enlarge.

Click to enlarge.

Index Dell Latitude D600: In the Field


View All Comments

  • Gholam - Saturday, October 2, 2004 - link

    IBM not performance machines? X-series, yes, but find me a performance laptop that weighs just over a kilo :) T42 on the other hand, can be configured with Pentium M 745 and Mobility Radeon 9600, which should give you pretty decent gaming capability. Of course it isn't as powerful as those Mobility Radeon 9800 based models, and the price ($3000-3500, depending on other components) is somewhat uncomfortable, but it's by no means weak. Reply
  • Souka - Saturday, October 2, 2004 - link

    Oh yes... I forgot to mention that I oversee the people who do the purchasing, repair, and I get feedback on reliablity of over 2000 units in the field and office....

  • Souka - Saturday, October 2, 2004 - link

    Actually, I find these laptops between the IBM X40 and the T42.

    My company uses only IBM laptops both at the corporate level, the branches, and our sales force. Office workers use the T series...from the T20 on up to the T42p. (I'm typing on a T41 right now and will be using a T42 soon). The X series....from the X21 on up to the X40...are used by most of the sales-team....with some T series tossed in there.

    Let me say HANDS DOWN, that IBM has proven their value to us....Period. Occasionally we evaluate Toshiba, Gateway, Dell.....they don't last the mininum 3 year life cycle....

    For public use, I don't always recommend IBM...they're definetly not performance machines....Games? forget it...

    Nuf Said.
  • Gholam - Saturday, October 2, 2004 - link

    #17, I'm a technician, and I can say this: HP assembly quality _SUCKS_. Really it does. It looks like they use 10lb hammers and chisels to make the parts fit somehow, and don't give a damn what happens afterwards. Some parts rattle; others are wedged in so tight there is no way to remove them without breaking something, and it's been the case with pretty much every HP laptop that I came across in the last couple years. I'm not a big fan of Dell either, but at least they are better than HP. Reply
  • andyman7 - Friday, October 1, 2004 - link

    why not try testing some laptops besides the big name brands?
    im typing this on a compal cl56
    it is 6lbs, has a 1.7ghz dothan, 512mb ram, 60gb 5400rpm hd, 128mb mobility radeon 9700, 15in sxga+ screen, dvd/cd-rw, and over 4 hours of battery life when using light applications
    and i got it for $1600
    also what about the sager line of laptops?
    most of those are definately DTRs but should definately be looked at has a lot of info on many other oem laptops too
    anyway, the cl56 im using has become REALLY popular so it might be a good idea to try testing one (if you can get a review sample)
  • stateofbeasley - Friday, October 1, 2004 - link

    Gholam - HP/Compaq is actually superior to Dell IMO when it comes to business notebooks.

    People sometimes say "brand X sucks," but don't realize that quality and service can vary significantly among a company's many product lines.

    As for Powerbooks - they don't compete with business machines like the nc6000 and D600. It would be more appropriate to compare them with Dell's 8600/D800 line and Compaq's X1000 type (widescreen 15" multimedia platform).
  • Gholam - Friday, October 1, 2004 - link

    #15, if there was a Thinkpad in the review, it would've been unfair, as no onther notebook vendor is even remotely close to standing up to IBM in terms of quality and engineering. I rank the top four notebook vendors in the following order: IBM, Toshiba, then Dell, and lastly HP/Compaq. Reply
  • Boardmonger - Friday, October 1, 2004 - link

    Can we say IBM Thinkpad T42p? I would love to see it thrown in the review ;) Reply
  • trikster2 - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    One thing that struck me is how much dell just seems to ignore how important battery life is. My D800 gets about two and a half hours, miserble. My C400 is not much better.

    I'm in the market for a laptop, considering everything including the macs and this review was very helpful.

    just want to say, since my above post could be taken negatively:

    Great review!
  • trikster2 - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    Another vote for the macs. For most business laptop use, as these are designed for they are fine subs for their pc brethern.

    I find it amazing that the 17" power book is only 6.9lbs close in weight to these ugly (comparitively) PC bricks.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now