Platform Analysis and Bandwidth Implications

The arrangement of the Thunderbolt 3 controller and any associated bridge chips / hubs inside the eGFX enclosure has a significant bearing on the performance. This is particularly important if the additional ports in the eGFX enclosure (USB / Ethernet / SATA etc.) are used simultaneously with the eGPU. In this section, we first determine the layout of the various ports in order to identify how the bandwidth is shared and which ports bottleneck each other. Following this, we do some tests to determine how the bandwidth sharing works for real-world scenarios.

Gaming Station - Internal Layout

The picture below shows the bus layout of the Intel NUC8i7BEH (Bean Canyon) NUC with the PowerColor Gaming Station eGFX enclosure attached to its Thunderbolt 3 port. The Radeon RX Vega 56 Nano is installed inside the enclosure, and all five USB 3.0 ports are connected to USB 3.0 external storage drives. The Ethernet port is also active.

The hardware report generated by HWiNFO shows that the Gaming Station uses a 2-port version of the Alpine Ridge controller for peripherals. One downstream port supports the x16 slot for the GPU, while the second downstream port acts as a USB 3.1 embedded endpoint. Simply put, this acts as a USB host interface, and PowerColor's design connects a Genesys Logic GL3520 to it. This hub chip supports 4 downstream ports - an ASMedia ASM2115 is connected to the first, and that enables the unadvertised SATA port inside the enclosure. The second port is connected to an ASIX AX88179 USB 3.0 to Gigabit Ethernet Adapter, and this enables the LAN port in the enclosure. The fourth port leads to the top USB 3.0 port in the front panel. The third port connects to another GL3520 hub chip, and the remaining four USB 3.0 ports (one in front and the three in the rear) are from this second hub. This break down clearly shows that any bandwidth-sensitive USB peripheral needs to be connected to the top USB 3.0 Type-A port in the front panel in order to avoid bandwidth sharing as much as possible.

Bandwidth Sharing

Thunderbolt 3 is advertised as providing 40 Gbps of external I/O bandwidth. But, this comes with some fine print. The 40 Gbps capability can only be achieved if we have display outputs being routed out through the Thunderbolt links. Intel's own technical brief clears up the situation.

The Thunderbolt 3 link between an eGFX enclosure and a host system is not meant to carry display traffic, and hence, we are effectively left with a PCIe 3.0 x4 link. Based on the board layout deciphered above, we configured the following setup:

  • Run the Radeon RX Vega 56 Nano as the display-driving GPU for the Bean Canyon NUC (Intel NUC8i7BEH)
  • Connect a 2TB Samsung Portable SSD T5 to USB Port #1
  • Connect a 240GB SanDisk Extreme Portable SSD to USB Port #4
  • Set up a fio workload to write sequential data within a 8GB span to the Samsung T5 for a pre-defined time interval
  • Set up a fio workload to read sequential data from a 8GB span in the SanDisk Extreme Portable SSD for a pre-defined time interval
  • Set up two different GPU workloads:
    • Run one instance of a OpenCL bandwidth test to transfer data from the host DRAM to the GPU VRAM and another instance to transfer data from the GPU VRAM to the host.
    • Run custom 3DMark Time Spy Extreme and Fire Strike workloads with only the graphics tests enabled

Various combinations of the above workloads were simultaneously processed to determine the real-world effects of bandwidth sharing.

PowerColor Gaming Station - Bandwidth Sharing Analysis (Gbps)
Experiment Read Port #4 Write Port #1 PCIe Device to Host PCIe Host to Device
USB Reads Only 2.498 - - -
USB Writes Only - 2.775 - -
USB Traffic Only 2.322 2.251 - -
PCIe Device to Host Only - - 14.552 -
PCIe Host to Device Only - - - 14.096
PCIe Traffic Only - - 8.472 8.440
All Interfaces Active 2.159 1.574 8.122 8.096

The above bandwidth numbers show that the best case numbers of around 10.2 Gbps / 9.6 Gbps for bidirectional bandwidth are quite far from the 22 Gbps / 22 Gbps capability of Thunderbolt 3 in this type of data-only scenario. Though the above numbers do not reflect the traffic necessary to keep the eGPU active as a display driver, it can be safely said that the USB 3.0 hub layout and the role of the second Alpine Ridge port as a USB 3.0 endpoint prevent the realization of the full potential of Thunderbolt 3 in the Gaming Station. That said, most enclosures in the price range (~USD 300) adopt a similar USB 3.0 hub strategy.

Real-World Implications

The artificial test-cases in the above sub-section do show that the bandwidth numbers take a slight hit as more players come into the fray. However, the question on whether there is a significant impact to real-world applications is not answered. To address that, we use the second set of GPU workloads. The two graphics tests in the Futuremark 3DMark Time Spy Extreme came in at 20.68 fps and 16.03 fps respectively in the absence of any USB traffic. Meanwhile, when loading traffic on both USB ports, the tests came in at 20.85 fps and 15.97 fps. These numbers are within the scope of variation from run to run even in the absence of USB traffic. A similar behavior was see for the Fire Strike workload. 90.3 fps and 71.45 fps for the two tests in the absence of USB traffic became 89.88 fps and 72.51 fps after USB traffic was turned on.

The average bandwidth for USB traffic over the duration of the graphics tests was around 2.3 Gbps / 2.3 Gbps, which is almost the same as what we saw for the 'USB traffic only' case in the previous sub-section's table. This doesn't preclude the possibility of occasional hiccups in the data transfer speeds. For most common eGPU workloads, users will rarely see any performance bottlenecking on the USB or eGPU side of matters; in our testing there's been enough bandwidth to keep the USB ports properly fed, even when the GPU is dealing with a gaming workload of its own.

Introduction and Product Impressions Evaluated System Configurations
POST A COMMENT

25 Comments

View All Comments

  • OolonCaluphid - Wednesday, February 13, 2019 - link

    As a Dan A4 owner, I'm absolutely crying at the size and emptyness of that box!! What an utter waste of space. You can get a whole PC in there, negating the need for an external GPU in the first place.

    (yeah yeah, I get it, it's for laptops... just build an SFF PC)
    Reply
  • Reflex - Wednesday, February 13, 2019 - link

    I also have a Dan A4-SFX and that was exactly my first thought! And for about the same price no less! Reply
  • hansmuff - Wednesday, February 13, 2019 - link

    I wonder if you could hook up a laptop to a gaming PC. Then, use Laptop keyboard, mouse and display as peripherals. I suppose the laptop would have to accept HDMI or DP as input, and I also suppose few if any do that? Reply
  • DanNeely - Wednesday, February 13, 2019 - link

    You're making it too complicated. No need for special hardware functions, when you could remote desktop/etc into a desktop from your laptop. Reply
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, February 14, 2019 - link

    Remote Desktop has a bit of trouble with DirectX and though the latency is a lot lower than something like VNC, it isn't intended as a solution for pushing a game's graphics over a network. Steam in-home streaming is a much better option for a local situation like that and you can use it rather effectively with non-Steam games by just adding them to Steam manually. You can also toss in programs like Windows Explorer or the components of an office suite to do something productive via Steam as well. In the end though, I do agree that remote access to a gaming PC from another PC is a layer of complexity that isn't typically necessary although you can, at least in theory, run a headless gaming desktop that way. Reply
  • WinterCharm - Wednesday, February 20, 2019 - link

    Steam has a built in game streaming solution that works perfectly for this. You don't need Windows Remote Desktop. You just use Steam's game streaming. Reply
  • 29a - Thursday, February 14, 2019 - link

    Steam does what you want. Reply
  • JoeTheDestroyr - Thursday, February 14, 2019 - link

    I wanted such a thing and couldn't find it. I enjoy the laptop form-factor for playing games in my comfy chair in my living room (and no, for the last time, I don't want to use my tv, I use that for other things).

    In the end, I had to make it myself. Grabbed a dead laptop off ebay, ripped out the guts, and replaced it w/ a Chinese board off ebay that could drive laptop lcd panels from a DP connection. Made my own usb keyboard controller using a Teensy. Even added a class D amp + USB audio to drive the laptop speakers (which sounded like garbage until I used a calibration mic + Equalizer APO to clean it up).
    Reply
  • JoeTheDestroyr - Thursday, February 14, 2019 - link

    Stupid no edit:

    ...enjoy the laptop form-factor for playing games in my comfy chair in my living room, but got tired of the ridiculous markup (and simultaneous lack of performance) on gaming laptops. And I don't care about portability, just "lap-ability" (moving it from a table to my lap, and back).
    Reply
  • watersb - Friday, February 15, 2019 - link

    Dang. That sounds like my kind of game. :-) Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now