Reports have emerged this week that SMIC, the largest foundry in China, is set to start mass production using its in-house developed 14 nm FinFET manufacturing technology in the first half of this year. Notably, this comes at least a couple of quarters earlier than was initially expected, indicating that SMIC is apparently ahead of schedule. Meanwhile the company is already working on its post-14nm processes, as development of its 10 nm and EUV-enabled 7 nm fabrication processes are currently underway.

Based on various reports from China and Taiwan technical media, SMIC’s yields at 14 nm have reached 95%, which is more than sufficient to start mass production. Consequently, the foundry is gearing up for volume production of a 14 nm smartphone SoC in the first half of 2019. While SMIC naturally does not disclose name of their first 14nm customer, the company’s key clients are HiSilicon, Qualcomm, and Fingerprint Cards (FPC, which produces fingerprint sensors), so it's a relatively short list of potential candidates.

Analysts say that SMIC’s 14 nm capacity will be relatively small when compared to the industry leaders, all of whom run multiple leading-edge fabs. SMIC currently has two fabs that can process 300 mm wafers using 28 nm and larger fabrication processes. The same fabs will be used for 14 nm projects too, but given their capacities and SMIC’s very high fab utilization rate (94.1% in Q2 2018), do not expect them to make loads of 14 nm SoCs. And for these reasons, along with prepping 14nm for its current fabs, the company is building a large $10 billion fab that will be used for its leading-edge manufacturing technologies in the future.

“SMIC is getting $10 billion to build capacity for 14nm, 10nm and 7nm. They will have capacity for 70,000 wafers a month by Q4 in 2021,” said Handel Jones, chief executive of International Business Strategies (IBS). “The building is huge. They have bought some equipment, but nothing significant yet.”

That said, do not expect SMIC to produce SoCs using leading-edge FinFET process technologies in quantities that are comparable to other makers of semiconductors in the foreseeable future. Even if the company can line up the capacity, lining up the demand could prove trickier. 14 nm chips are expensive to design and build the masks for, which is why so much chip volume is still at 28 nm and larger

Overview of SMIC's Fabs
  Process Technologies Capacity
Wafer Starts per Month
Location
BJ 200mm 90 nm - 150 nm 50,000 Beijing, China
300mm 28 nm - 65 nm 35,000
SH 200 mm 90 nm - 350 nm 120,000 Shanghai ,China
300 mm 28 nm - 65 nm 20,000
SZ 200 mm 90 nm - 350 nm 60,000 Shenzhen, China
TJ 200 mm 90 nm - 350 nm 50,000 Tianjin, China
LF 200 mm 90 nm - 180 nm 50,000 Avezzano, Italy

SMIC's latest progress slots in well with China's ambitious “Made in China 2025” plan. Under the plan, government planners want to achieve a 70% chip self-sufficiency by 2025, which having a leading-edge fab will help with. However there's doubt among analysts doubt that it is possible. Most of the ICs produced in China by 2025 will be made by companies based outside of the country.

Past 14nm, SMIC is already at work on its 10nm and 7nm processes as well, as previously confirmed by the company in 2018. Both processes are extremely costly to design, but since the semiconductor industry is growing in general and because of generous funding from the Chinese government (and various affiliated parties), SMIC has enough money for the necessary R&D. Working towards that goal, last year SMIC acquired an EUV step-and-scan system from ASML for $120 million, which is expected to be delivered early in 2019 for use in 7 nm process development and eventually mass production.

Related Reading:

Sources: CN Beta, China Securities, DigiTimes, EETimes, IC Insights, InstantFlashNews, SemiEngineering, TechNews

POST A COMMENT

20 Comments

View All Comments

  • Marlin1975 - Friday, February 08, 2019 - link

    "in-house developed"

    Haha... Yea maybe in house developed; but not their house I bet.
    Reply
  • FreckledTrout - Friday, February 08, 2019 - link

    Someone had to copy the designs in their house. That surely counts? Reply
  • Opencg - Friday, February 08, 2019 - link

    china aint got nothing on USAs intel B1G D1X fab. Reply
  • close - Wednesday, February 13, 2019 - link

    That's how crowns change hands (or heads). They're stolen. It' been done by every major power before. And in case you're wondering, yes, the US did it too when the British empire haf that crown.

    Coming back to the topic, when prices go down due to the increased supply I'm sure you'll be more than happy to finance "the wrong house".
    Reply
  • jeremyshaw - Friday, February 08, 2019 - link

    Well, if they conquer Taiwan by 2025, they can make their plan work, lol. Reply
  • twtech - Friday, February 08, 2019 - link

    Setting up a scorched-Earth defense might actually be Taiwan's best way to maintain independence.

    Ie. as a last defense, we'd destroy our infrastructure and force you to rebuild it post-takeover.
    Reply
  • limitedaccess - Friday, February 08, 2019 - link

    There isn't a need for that. They're following the Samsung approach and hired the same guy that Samsung originally poached from TSMC.

    https://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=133246...

    I guess turn around is fair play though. Expect plenty of similarities of this 14nm process and Samsung's.
    Reply
  • peevee - Monday, February 11, 2019 - link

    Without doubt, the amount of stolen/unlicensed technology there is large.

    But the sad thing is Intel only has its 14nm production-ready, as the yield on its "10 nm" does not reach economical/competitive with 14nm yet, and does not look good for the next few years either.
    Reply
  • ksec - Friday, February 08, 2019 - link

    The hardest part is getting the yield, building more capacity is simply a money issues which isn't problem for SMIC. Assuming their 14nm are anywhere as good as TSMC 16nm, there will be huge shift towards SMIC 14nm within China. Reply
  • Arbie - Saturday, February 09, 2019 - link

    Are you sure they didn't mean Intel? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now