System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Corsair HX 750 power supply. This power supply is Platinum rated. As I am in the US on a 120 V supply, leads to ~87% efficiency > 75W, and 92%+ efficiency at 375W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)

Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)

Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

In our power consumption tests, the Z370 Taichi used a few more watts on idle than most boards we have tested with long idle use at 46W and OS idle using 48W. Load power use was better compared to others, showing 144W. 

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows 10 starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.

Non UEFI POST Time

In our POST test results, the Taichi started to load windows in a shade under 17 seconds default and 15.4 seconds when we stripped functionality down disabling extra SATA, LAN, and USB controllers. This result was the fastest boot times so far by nearly 1 second.  

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds. 

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

The DPC latency results for the Z370 Taichi we also the best we have seen out of what has been tested so far with a time of 101µs. This result easily eclipsed the previous best for the platform of 265µs, but mainly due to an adjustment in our testing procedure as mentioned on the front page. As we test more boards (we might have to retest a couple as well), this value should me more consistent across the products. We're not putting much weight on this result in our conclusion at this time due to the change.

Board Features CPU Performance: Short Form
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • inighthawki - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    Ah yes, a PS/2 port. I see their 2018 models are cutting edge. Please include a nice parallel port as well for my printer.
  • stuffwhy - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    While it's use cases are very very rare nowadays, I can see much more potential for someone to have an old favorite keyboard than desperately have to use an old parallel port printer or peripheral. Heck, anything requiring a parallel port probably wouldn't even have driver support in Windows 10.
  • Gasaraki88 - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    This comment shows how much you know about technology and cutting performance. Most new gaming motherboard have a PS/2 port for the mice. PS/2 gaming mice perform better than USB. Please keep up with the times.
  • inighthawki - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    By a negligible amount, unless maybe you have 10 USB devices plugged in stressing the entire bus all at the same time. You're talking about an absolutely negligible difference in latency and processing time for a gaming rig.
  • GTVic - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    It's not negligible to ASRock if the consumer purchases the competitor's motherboard because ASRock's board didn't have this feature.
  • anon94582 - Sunday, July 22, 2018 - link

    And it cost negligible to add while provides added service to consumers who use PS/2 mouse/keyboard.
  • BoneHurtingJuice - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    In my experience, PS/2 keyboard/mouse combo ports are finicky at best. I couldn't get my programmable cash register keyboard to be detected at all on these ports.
  • Kraszmyl - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    The ps2 port is for gamers and their keyboards. They are technically better than USB ones.
  • DanNeely - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    A number of newer USB gaming keyboards will use a high end keyboard driver model for n-key rollover instead of the baseline USB-1 implementation that only supported 5 keys, taking away the mash keys like crazy advantage that PS2 used to have.
  • baka_toroi - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    >instead of the baseline USB-1 implementation that only supported 5 keys

    For fucks sake. I always thought it was a membrane keyboard thing, not a protocol-level thing.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now