Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks

The Thunderbolt 3 specifications indicate that the host port must be able to supply up to 15W for bus-powered devices connected to it. Since the TEKQ Rapide is a bus-powered device, it is given that its power consumption can't exceed 15W in order to be a certified Thunderbolt 3 device. It is still relevant to take a fine-grained look at the power consumption profile. Using the Plugable USBC-TKEY, the bus power consumption for the external SSD was tracked while the CrystalDiskMark workloads were processed. The workloads were set up with an interval time of 30s. The power consumption was tracked only for the exFAT version of the CrystalDiskMark workloads.

We find that the peak power consumption is slightly south of 7W. The SSD idles at around 2.5 W.

Support for TRIM is an important aspect - it ensures that performance consistency is maintained even after the SSD has been subject to long-term use. Since the Thunderbolt interface is transparent for all practical purposes, and the host OS sees a PCIe NVMe SSD, it comes down to the Phison E7 reference design supporting TRIM. We were able to successfully activate TRIM on the TEKQ Rapide.

The final aspect that we deal with in the review is the pricing. TEKQ sent over the following pricing table for the three variants.

TEKQ Rapide Thunderbolt 3 External SSDs - Pricing
Capacity Retail Indiegogo Amazon
240 GB $319 $255 $300
480 GB $479 $383 $450
960 GB $899 $719 $900

There are very few bus-powered Thunderbolt 3 external SSDs currently in the market, though a number of them have been announced recently. The only current alternative to the TEKQ Rapide in its price range is the OWC Envoy Pro EX / EX(VE). The 250GB variant of the OWC unit comes in at $280, which is much cheaper than the TEKQ Rapide. That said, the Envoy Pro EX tops out at 1800 MBps. The EX(VE) goes up to 2600 MBps, but carries a hefty price premium. The TEKQ does guarantee a M.2 SSD with MLC NAND flash. While OWC doesn't clarify that aspect for either of their Envoy Pro offerings, it appears likely that the EX uses TLC, while the EX(VE) uses MLC flash. Most of the upcoming Thunderbolt 3 external SSDs are going to be based on the Phison E8 reference design with 3D TLC. In this context, a MLC external SSD such as the TEKQ Rapide is bound to appeal better to a section of the market.

While taking up the review unit, I was expecting to wade through the usual beta-testing bugs (particularly given that TEKQ had not released any high-performance external storage devices before). I was pleasantly surprised that all our tests were processed without a hitch. The performance of the TEKQ Rapide is top-notch and meets the claimed numbers. Adding a user-friendly way to activate the hardware encryption capabilities of the internal SSD would be a nice feature to have, but, it is a minor nit-pick. Our main concern is the pricing (compared to the TLC-using competition in the market) and the availability of flash for TEKQ to ramp up volume and make the device more economical to address the mainstream market.

AnandTech DAS Suite and Performance Consistency
Comments Locked

33 Comments

View All Comments

  • Vatharian - Tuesday, February 20, 2018 - link

    I'd actually love to buy enclosure by itself. USB 3.0 to M.2 AHCI adapters are widely available in rather funny prices, while for obvious reasons USB to NVMe are not available at all.

    This would not only give me very fast attachable storage, but also fool proof way to backup/restore NVMe drives without need to shutdown PC every time.
  • MajGenRelativity - Tuesday, February 20, 2018 - link

    That's my idea too
  • ZeDestructor - Tuesday, February 20, 2018 - link

    I'll second that motion, and also put in a request for a U.2 version of the same.

    ...I buy entirely too much second-hand server hardware.
  • Vatharian - Tuesday, February 20, 2018 - link

    You're not alone :)

    As far as I know U.2 (or rather SFF-8639) actually supports hot plug by itself. You can easily drop in external port trough PCI bracket, tie in some power delivery and voila, You'd only need to 3D print or rig some kind of enclosure, or repurpose 2.5" 15mm SATA one.

    Still, I am disappointed, that U.2 didn't already die. It should go away, like now. We have much better standards and more robust, too.
  • Billy Tallis - Tuesday, February 20, 2018 - link

    It's a little soon to be asking for U.2 to die. The EDSFF standards are less than a month old and the NGSFF standard is still a few weeks away. U.2 is a transitional standard to bridge the gap between hard drive-based interfaces and form factors, and pure SSD-oriented standards. That transition isn't over yet, and the industry is only just now entering the final phase of that transition.
  • sheepdestroyer - Tuesday, February 20, 2018 - link

    But again, there is the power requirement.
    Will USB be able to provide enough juice to the SSD?
  • WinterCharm - Tuesday, February 20, 2018 - link

    SSD's generally use less power than HDD's.
  • SleepyFE - Tuesday, February 20, 2018 - link

    + USB power delivery can now pump through 100W (5A at 20V).
  • Vatharian - Tuesday, February 20, 2018 - link

    I'm not longing for USB NVMe adapter, that's pointless. Thunderbolt has higher power delivery capabilities than USB 3.1 by itself.
  • theopensauce - Wednesday, February 21, 2018 - link

    The best and logical comment I've seen on this site so far. I had the same thought with the NVMe backup/restore. There are no good ways to clone NVMe drives presently unless you use an older SSD via USB 3.0. And I am not patient. Plus if you do IT support or run a business time is money and the more efficiency you have the more profit you have.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now