Board Features

The NZXT N7 motherboard has a benefit of being born into an already established ecosystem of products that compliment the board. The board integrates the Hue+ RGB Lighting control, GRID+ digital fan controls in the CAM software for a single dashboard to control many frequently accessed features. As a user with multiple M.2 based storage devices, I prefer the route NZXT took enabling full bandwidth of both M.2 slots (though it does come at the expense of two SATA ports). The black or white metal covers give the board a modern and clean look able to blend in with most any build theme. 

NZXT N7
Warranty Period 4 Years
Product Page LINK
Price $299 (Reduced to $249 1/19/18)
Size ATX
CPU Interface LGA1151
Chipset Intel Z370
Memory Slots (DDR4) Four DDR4
Dual Channel
Supporting 64GB
Up to DDR4 3866
Network Connectivity / Wi-Fi 1 x Intel I219V GbE
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC1220 7.1ch surround
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU)  2 x PCIe 3.0
Single GPU: x16 
Dual GPUs: x8/x8
PCIe Slots for Other (from PCH) 2 x PCIe 3.0 x4
1 x PCIe 3.0 x1
Onboard SATA 4 x RAID 0/1/5/10
Onboard SATA Express None
Onboard M.2 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 and SATA modes
1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 mode only
Onboard U.2 None
USB 3.1 None
USB 3.0 Chipset
8 x (4 at back panel, 2 onboard headers)
USB 2.0 Chipset
11 x (5 at back panel, 3 onboard headers)
Power Connectors 1 x 24-pin ATX
1 x 8-pin CPU
Fan Headers 1 x 4-pin CPU
1 x 4-pin AIO
1 x 4-pin W Pump
6 x 4-pin Sys Fan (* 5W max.)
IO Panel 5 x USB 2.0
4 x USB 3.1 (5 Gbps)
1 x DisplayPort (1.2)
1 x HDMI (1.4b)
1 x Clear CMOS button2
1 x LAN (RJ45 port)
1 x Optical SPDIF Out port
1 x 7.1-ch Audio jacks

Test Bed

As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard that was released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC sub timings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend our testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency/monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

Test Setup
Processor Intel i7 8700K (6C/12T, 3.7G, 95W)
Motherboard NZXT N7 (BIOS 1.0.0)
Cooling Corsair H115i
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x8GB DDR4 2666 CL16
Corsair Vengeance 4x4GB DDR4 3200 CL16

(used in 2x 4/8GB capacity on dual Channel Platfrom
Memory Settings DDR4 2666 CL16-18-18-35 2T
Video Cards ASUS Strix GTX 980
Hard Drive Crucial MX300 1TB
Optical Drive TSST TS-H653G
Case Open Test Bed
Operating System Windows 10 Pro 64-bit

Many thanks to...

We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our multiple test beds. Some of this hardware is not in this testbed specifically but is used in other testing.

Thank you to ASUS for providing us with GTX 980 Strix GPUs. At the time of release, the STRIX brand from ASUS was aimed at silent running, or to use the marketing term: '0dB Silent Gaming'. This enables the card to disable the fans when the GPU is dealing with low loads well within temperature specifications. These cards equip the GTX 980 silicon with ASUS' Direct CU II cooler and 10-phase digital VRMs, aimed at high-efficiency conversion. Along with the card, ASUS bundles GPU Tweak software for overclocking and streaming assistance.

The GTX 980 uses NVIDIA's GM204 silicon die, built upon their Maxwell architecture. This die is 5.2 billion transistors for a die size of 298 mm2, built on TMSC's 28nm process. A GTX 980 uses the full GM204 core, with 2048 CUDA Cores and 64 ROPs with a 256-bit memory bus to GDDR5. The official power rating for the GTX 980 is 165W.

The ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB (or the full name of STRIX-GTX980-DC2OC-4GD5) runs a reasonable overclock over a reference GTX 980 card, with frequencies in the range of 1178-1279 MHz. The memory runs at stock, in this case, 7010 MHz. Video outputs include three DisplayPort connectors, one HDMI 2.0 connector, and a DVI-I.

Further Reading: AnandTech's NVIDIA GTX 980 Review

 

Thank you to Crucial for providing us with MX300 SSDs. Crucial stepped up to the plate as our benchmark list grows larger with newer benchmarks and titles, and the 1TB MX300 units are strong performers. Based on Marvell's 88SS1074 controller and using Micron's 384Gbit 32-layer 3D TLC NAND, these are 7mm high, 2.5-inch drives rated for 92K random read IOPS and 530/510 MB/s sequential read and write speeds.

The 1TB models we are using here support TCG Opal 2.0 and IEEE-1667 (eDrive) encryption and have a 360TB rated endurance with a three-year warranty.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Crucial MX300 (750 GB) Review

 

Thank you to Corsair for providing us with Vengeance LPX DDR4 Memory, HX750 Power Supply, and H115i CPU Cooler

Corsair kindly sent a 4x8GB DDR4 2666 set of their Vengeance LPX low profile, high-performance memory for our stock testing. The heatsink is made of pure aluminum to help remove heat from the sticks and has an eight-layer PCB. The heatsink is a low profile design to help fit in spaces where there may not be room for a tall heat spreader; think a SFF case or using a large heatsink. Timings on this specific set come in at 16-18-18-35. The Vengeance LPX line supports XMP 2.0 profiles for easily setting the speed and timings. It also comes with a limited lifetime warranty. 

Powering the test system is Corsair's HX750 Power Supply. This HX750 is a dual mode unit able to switch from a single 12V rail (62.5A/750W) to a five rail CPU (40A max ea.) and is also fully modular. It has a typical selection of connectors, including dual EPS 4+4 pin four PCIe connectors and a whopping 16 SATA power leads, as well as four 4-pin Molex connectors.

The 135mm fluid dynamic bearing fan remains off until it is 40% loaded offering complete silence in light workloads. The HX750 comes with a ten-year warranty. 

In order to cool these high-TDP HEDT CPUs, Corsair sent over its latest and largest AIO in the H115i. This closed-loop system uses a 280mm radiator with 2x140mm SP140L PWM controlled fans. The pump/block combination mounts to all modern CPU sockets. Users are also able to integrate this cooler into the Corsair link software via USB for more control and options. 

BIOS and Software Benchmark Overview
Comments Locked

60 Comments

View All Comments

  • tech6 - Tuesday, January 9, 2018 - link

    $300 for no USB 3.1 from a brand with almost no mobo track record seems a little high.

    I also wish manufacturers would focus on functionality rather than gimmicks like covers, LEDs and funky colored PCBs. Not every enthusiast is 16 years old.
  • nathanddrews - Tuesday, January 9, 2018 - link

    IO Panel 5 x USB 2.0
    4 x USB 3.1 (5 Gbps)
    1 x DisplayPort (1.2)
    1 x HDMI (1.4b)
    1 x Clear CMOS button2
    1 x LAN (RJ45 port)
    1 x Optical SPDIF Out port
    1 x 7.1-ch Audio jacks
  • Death666Angel - Tuesday, January 9, 2018 - link

    My guess is he means "USB 3.1 Gen2" as opposed to the here used "USB3.1 Gen1". The difference being one is the old USB 3.0 (5Gbit/s = Gen1) and the other is the new 10Gbit/s one. USB consortium fucked that one up pretty well.
  • Threska - Tuesday, January 9, 2018 - link

    I could see covers as part of EMI and thermal management. As well as keeping board clean, and protecting from damage.
  • bigboxes - Saturday, January 20, 2018 - link

    That's what a case is for.
  • NZXTconvert - Tuesday, February 6, 2018 - link

    No 3.1? Oh contrare. There are two on board and five at the IO panel. Perfomance-wise, it's got the 370 chipset, supports 8th gen i7, and ports at M.2 for Optane. What's your beef? As for the aesthetics, could you be any more wrongheaded? For someone my age, a great deal of the appeal this board has is that it does NOT scream of the juvenile. Every sign of clutter is countered by the covers. Seamless. I'm in a whole world of happy with this board. For this to have been any company's first venture into the market is a marvel. How many companies possibly have such bragging rights? Is it niche?? These days, what isn't? I'm putting mine in a matte black Streacom FC5 Alpha. The whole setup's going to satisfy me for a decade and more. This is a very sophisticated board. And if someone wants to spring for it with its optional candy touches, RGB and all, why not? It'll perform in either event. If there's additional functionality you wish the board had, you could state specifically what you have in mind. But insulting not only the manufacturer but its customers is so, well, trendy.
  • HStewart - Tuesday, January 9, 2018 - link

    Interesting Motherboard designed - it would be interesting to find out long term effect of such designed - cooling, serviceability and other things.
  • megapleb - Tuesday, January 9, 2018 - link

    What did I miss on the comparisons? Why it is all to i9-7900X systems instead of other Z370 motherboard?
  • Joe Shields - Tuesday, January 9, 2018 - link

    We do not have any Z370 motherboard data outside of the two others that were included with different uncore. Instead of sparse graphs we chose to add it in with the 7900X/X299 boards I have data on already.

    There will be more reviews on this platform with data comparing it to like systems.
  • Slash3 - Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - link

    Basically, AT needs to get reviewin' so they have something to compare it to. :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now