This morning at the Qualcomm Snapdragon Summit in Hawaii, Microsoft’s EVP of Windows and Devices, Terry Myerson, is announcing the introduction of the first Windows 10 PCs to be powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon processors. It was almost a year ago to the day that the company first announced their partnership with Qualcomm, which would bring ARM support to Windows 10, but with x86 emulation, allowing all existing applications to work as well. The first PCs will be the ASUS NovaGo, which is a convertible laptop, and the HP ENVY x2 convertible tablet.

The ASUS NovaGo Laptop

This is exciting news on a couple of fronts. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, which was the processor first announced for Windows 10 on ARM, offers reasonable performance, but with lower power consumption than what we’ve been used to in the PC space, and especially in low-power states. Without having the devices in-hand, we still don’t know how the SD835 compares in performance to the competition. We should finally be able to answer that soon though.

The HP ENVY x2 Tablet

One of the key pieces of using a mobile SoC in a PC is the extra integration. Smartphones don’t have room for large circuit boards, while still providing room for all of the other equipment and batteries required, and mobile SoCs offer a lot more features integrated into the SoC than what a typical PC would, which allows for substantial board space savings over the competition. Back at Computex, Qualcomm was showing off the SD835 PC board compared to a competing 14nm Intel board, and the space savings were up to 30%. This allows smaller, thinner, and lighter devices, but with more battery capacity.

One of the major integrations with the SD835 compared to PC SoCs is the integrated cellular connectivity, which is one of the features that Microsoft is championing the most with this new partnership. There have been PCs with cellular cards added on for some time, but Qualcomm’s cellular tech is aimed at mobile, where always-on connectivity, and low-power usage, is a requirement. That same connectivity will be available on the PC as well, with an always-connected network connection providing a better user experience than what we’ve become accustomed to in the laptop world.

Battery life should also be a big win, and while we don’t have our own tests done yet, Microsoft’s information is claiming up to 30 days of standby and up to 22 hours of active use, while the detachable tablet-style HP ENVY x2 is claiming up to 20 hours of active use. That’s impressive, and blows past the all-day battery life that we’ve come to expect in a laptop, and should free a device up for a couple of days of use before charging. Terry Myerson has stated that he’s been getting up to a week of use out of a device before he needs to charge it.

The always-on nature of mobile brings other advantages too. The PCs will wake up instantly, just like you’d expect on your phone, or mobile tablet.

The ARM equipped devices will be running full Windows 10, so no desktop apps are left behind, unlike the previous time that Microsoft attempted this. The ARM chips at the time offered much less performance as well, so this time around, it should be a much better experience. Universal Windows Apps will be available compiled for ARM directly, but x86 apps will run in emulation, which is still a cause for concern for both performance and battery life, so we’ll have to see how that pans out. Microsoft has an “optimized” version of Office 365 for the new ARM powered PCs, which likely means it’s been recompiled for native performance.

Perhaps the most exciting part of the announcement is what added competition in this space should bring to the end-user. We have Qualcomm coming to the PC from the mobile space, where low-power has always been key, but the performance has been improving steadily, and we have Intel and AMD on the other side, coming from a high-performance but higher-power world, where integration of components into the SoC hasn’t been as high of a priority. It’ll be interesting to see where the convergence happens in the coming months.

Source: Microsoft

POST A COMMENT

58 Comments

View All Comments

  • Samus - Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - link

    Why was Microsoft so confused for so long until now? Reply
  • junky77 - Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - link

    Were busy issuing office licenses Reply
  • HStewart - Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - link

    It looks Windows RT or Surface RT is back - here is link about a surface device supposedly coming on with a newer 845 chips that has around speed of iPhone 6S

    https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/snapdragon...
    Reply
  • Alexvrb - Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - link

    An 845... speed of an iPhone 6S? What are you relying on, Geekbench?? Hahah...

    Anyway performance will be excellent for ARM-compiled apps but it should run x86 software well enough too based on existing demos. Plus it brings with it the possibility of affordable low-power Windows devices again, after Intel killed off the ULP Atoms.
    Reply
  • lilmoe - Wednesday, December 06, 2017 - link

    It gets tiring after a while. Just let it go man and let them say whatever they want. I don't believe even Apple's latest is any better from the current Snapdragon 835, and definitely not the current Exynos (or even last year's).

    But sure, whatever. Use all the rigged benchmarks you want.
    Reply
  • scstraus - Thursday, December 07, 2017 - link

    I'm perfectly content using only windows store apps and the new office optimized for ARM if I can get 15 hours of battery life out of a thin and light device.. I have a 10" windows tablet for meetings, presentations and using on the place, and this will be the perfect upgrade if they ever make a 10".. It's so nice to not have to carry around a power supply or bulky device when going to customer meetings. Reply
  • negusp - Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - link

    This'll probably go the way of Core M. The NovaGo in particular is far too expensive for a light-use-case device that can hardly run x86 at any acceptable speed.

    Chromebooks have won in this sector imo. Cheap as hell, fast, good battery life, and the ability to install full Linux distros.
    Reply
  • HStewart - Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - link

    This computer is less than Core m in performance - likely Pentium or Atom in performance. Chromebook would be good candidate. Reply
  • damianrobertjones - Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - link

    Chromebooks? Winning a sector? Any proof of that at all? Reply
  • ikjadoon - Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - link

    Chromebooks do quite well in education--but the closed-garden SOFTWARE is what's the killer here, not necessarily the price or performance.

    https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/27/as-chromebook-sa...

    Combine Apple's marketshare + Window's marketshare. Then add 70% more. That's how well Chromebooks do in education, at least in the US (58% marketshare vs 19% and 22% respectively).
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now