Construction — Build, Appearance, Size

The X300 continues the Latitude tradition with its Ion Silver color scheme. The notebook is easy to open via a single sliding clip.


Click to enlarge.


Opening up the Latitude X300 reveals a 12.1" XGA (1024x768) screen, which is the standard for ultraportable notebooks. Anything larger wouldn't keep the small footprint needed to design a notebook of this style. As we have noted before, slightly larger screens supporting only XGA resolutions at many times look odd, but 1024x768 fits the 12.1" screen perfectly.

One of the tendencies of moving to an ultraportable design is the necessary sacrifices needed to be made to maximize the use of space. Often, the keyboard layout is the first thing to be altered, and this results in keyboard keys that are a bit too small for conformability. Similar to the IBM ThinkPad X31, the X300 uses a full size keyboard similar to higher end Dell notebooks, specifically the Inspiron 8600. The alphanumeric keys are full-sized and very comparable to the Inspiron 8600, and so, to cut down on the space used, the real estate of function keys (control, shift, etc.) have been slightly reduced. We still prefer the quality of the keyboard on the X31 compared to the X300, as IBM's ultraportable has a better tactile feel.

On the subject of layout, Dell includes a windows key, which IBM doesn't. The X300 also makes a good note of placing the control key on the far left, which is definitely a plus.


Click to enlarge.


Oddly enough, we were a bit surprised that the set of buttons for the touchpad has a strip of rubber. Dell told us this was for aesthetic detail and to add tactile response (basically, some grip). This did take some time to get used to, but we did like this little add-on, and some texture in the rubber strip is something we would like to see in the future. Perhaps, Dell can create different rubber strips, like there is for the IBM track stick, which is missing from this notebook. This is a love-it or hate-it feature, but something we are personally fans of. Sound is supplied via two small speakers, which are directly below the touchpad buttons. This placement keeps them a bit away from typing hands, but placed so they can still direct sound toward the user.



There are no function buttons on the X300, as the power button is the only button apparent. It is interesting to note that once the battery is removed, there is a significant gap between the keyboard and the screen. The screen hinges on two parts of the frame that extend toward it. There is no hinge in between.



There is only one set of LEDs on the X300, which are present on the lower right hand edge of the frame. The front of the X300 slopes down slightly, which allows the LEDs to be partially visible while closed. There are seven LEDs at this location (left to right): number lock status, caps lock status, scroll lock status, power state, hard drive activity, battery state, and Bluetooth receiver status. We didn't have Bluetooth in our sample, so we aren't able to say what color LED it uses, though we suspect it is green. All of the LEDs use green to indicate status, but the battery LED will turn orange when low.



Index Construction - Build, Appearance, Size (continued)
Comments Locked

6 Comments

View All Comments

  • DL2 - Saturday, March 20, 2004 - link

    I currently have an x300. I travel a great deal and have had a problem with a spot appearing on the screen. I have already had the screen replaced once and soon to be again. My question is would the IBM x31 be more durable than the Dell 300? I have not been able to find a x31 to compare to.

  • Shalmanese - Saturday, November 1, 2003 - link

    When anyone says Centrino, the basically mean the Pentium-M. Its just that Centrino is the more recognisable brand name. Technically, half the machines out there aren't real Centrinos since they use a 3rd party 802.11a/b/g chip.

    And I wasn't saying that the R50p was comparable to the X300, I just wanted it on the waiting list for reviews. IBM haven't had a serious Desktop replacement machine since the A31p over a year ago. (The G series doesn't count due to its sucky onboard graphics). It should be interesting what it brings to the table.
  • RichieZ - Saturday, November 1, 2003 - link

    "BTW, the T40 isn't all that much bigger than the X31.... I like mine :)"

    Um the T40 is quite a bit bigger than the X31, I had a T40 at work and have an X31 as my personal machine.

    Isn't this X300 acutally made by samsung?
  • Randalmaker - Saturday, November 1, 2003 - link

    "Centrino technology continues to breathe a breath of fresh air into the market with a marriage of performance and portability."...omg stop this blue-eyed intelback-scratchin plz. we all know that the real innovation here is the banias only and that intel is using their marketing power and money 2 wipe out its mainboard competition once more. i shouldnt have 2 tell u that. centrino is a joke but it worx
  • Souka - Friday, October 31, 2003 - link

    R50p is a "monster" in size compared to these ultra-portables.... review, yes...comparable, no.

    anyways....yeah, the X31 rulz....more expensive, but going cheap on laptops is often not worth it. BTW, the T40 isn't all that much bigger than the X31.... I like mine :)


  • Shalmanese - Thursday, October 30, 2003 - link

    "The X31 rains supreme in the battery life department."...

    Anyway, the feature set looks a lot like the Sony ultra-portables, right down to the blocking of the VGA port when you stick the media bay on.

    quick request: would it be possible for you to review the IBM R50p when it comes out? Exected release date is november some time. Thanks

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now