Gaming Performance - Serious Sam: The Second Encounter

Serious Sam 2 Performance
800x600x32
Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz GF4 Ti 4200)

Dell D800 (1.6GHz GF4 4200 Go)

Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz Radeon 9000 Pro)

IBM T40p (1.6GHz Mobility FireGL 9000)

132.8

130.3

120.9

80.8

|
0
|
27
|
53
|
80
|
106
|
133
|
16

The results of Serious Sam: The Second Encounter testing at 800x600x32 mimic the results seen throughout the entire Unreal Tournament 2003 tests. Again, note:

Desktop GeForce4 Ti 4200 > GeForce4 4200 Go > ATI Radeon 9000 Pro > ATI FireGL 9000

Serious Sam 2 Performance
Minimum FPS - 800x600x32
Dell D800 (1.6GHz GF4 4200 Go)

Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz GF4 Ti 4200)

Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz Radeon 9000 Pro)

IBM T40p (1.6GHz Mobility FireGL 9000)

84

83.6

69.2

56.5

|
0
|
17
|
34
|
50
|
67
|
84
|
101

Looking at the minimum frame rates of the systems at 800x600x32 show something interesting: the Dell Latitude D800 holds the performance crown, albeit by an extremely small margin. Even at 54FPS, the IBM ThinkPad T40p provides enough speed to get by.

Serious Sam 2 Performance
1024x768x32
Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz GF4 Ti 4200)

Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz Radeon 9000 Pro)

Dell D800 (1.6GHz GF4 4200 Go)

IBM T40p (1.6GHz Mobility FireGL 9000)

104.9

98.8

91.4

56.6

|
0
|
21
|
42
|
63
|
84
|
105
|
126

The desktop setups take over spots one and two once the resolution is bumped up to 1024x768x32. Like the performance delta observed in Unreal Tournament 2003 at 1280x960x32, the GeForce4 4200 Go is about 61% faster than the Mobility FireGL 9000 in Serious Sam 2 at 1024x768x32.

Serious Sam 2 Performance
Minimum FPS - 1024x768x32
Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz GF4 Ti 4200)

Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz Radeon 9000 Pro)

Dell D800 (1.6GHz GF4 4200 Go)

IBM T40p (1.6GHz Mobility FireGL 9000)

67.9

65.3

62.5

42.9

|
0
|
14
|
27
|
41
|
54
|
68
|
8

Same story with the minimum frame rates at this resolution. Note the large drop in minimum frame rates on the Mobility FireGL 9000 solution.

Serious Sam 2 Performance
1280x1024x32
Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz GF4 Ti 4200)

Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz Radeon 9000 Pro)

Dell D800 (1.6GHz GF4 4200 Go)

IBM T40p (1.6GHz Mobility FireGL 9000)

69.6

66.9

60.1

37.9

|
0
|
14
|
28
|
42
|
56
|
70
|
84

At 1280x1024x32, the desktop configurations remain champions but the Dell Dimension D800 continues to beat up on the IBM T40p in 3D gaming by outperforming it 59%.

Serious Sam 2 Performance
Minimum FPS - 1280x1024x32
Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz GF4 Ti 4200)

Dell D800 (1.6GHz GF4 4200 Go)

Desktop Pentium 4 (2.4GHz Radeon 9000 Pro)

IBM T40p (1.6GHz Mobility FireGL 9000)

48.8

45.1

40.2

29.2

|
0
|
10
|
20
|
29
|
39
|
49
|
59

Gaming Performance - Unreal Tournament 2003 Gaming Performance - Jedi Knight 2
Comments Locked

3 Comments

View All Comments

  • builda - Thursday, February 2, 2006 - link

    There appears to be a wide spread fault with the Gigabyte NB-1401 model notebook, where it reports having system disk errors or cannot find the hard disk. We have 7 of this model notebook and now 6 of them have reported the same problem. After running chkdsk to temporarily repair the errors that had been caused on the harddisk I found the problem returned the escalated to the point the harddisk could not be found. I further checked using Hitachi drive fitness testing tool which reported a cable error on each machine. Originally I returned 3 of these for repair as they were just outside the warranty period and the supplier checked with Gigabyte with the fix being to rub the cable all over with an eraser!! This worked for a short period but the problem has returned a couple of months later and has spread (like a virus) it now affects 6 out of the 7 notebooks. The supplier has just gone into administration and my next step is to approach Gigabyte who's support service has been found to be extremely unresponsive in the recent past.
  • dbiberdorf - Tuesday, July 27, 2004 - link

    I beg to differ with the reviewer. The keyboard on this unit is mediocre, and the track stick buttons are an abomination. They sit too low in the case and have too much travel. It makes my thumbs hurt after a while, and I often have to press them with a finger to get them to activate fully.

    The most powerful notebook in the world loses big points in my book if they built-in keyboard and pointing devices are weak. Certainly it's the case here. Dell, please figure out how to buy good keyboards for your machines!

    Finally, the power adapter, while featuring convienent wrap-around cabling, is phenomenally large. My cordless phone at home is smaller. With the large profile of the machine, the adapter has to go in a side pocket of the carrying case, adding a little more bulge to your day.
  • visibilityunlimited - Thursday, October 30, 2003 - link

    Screen resolution beyond SXGA+ would be unreadable using Windows for example while being more readable using Linux.

    Both the Linux text console and graphics mode X-windows-system screen drivers can be fully customized to display text at any resolution. The text characters could easily be displayed with current software at 1200dpi or more (if only the graphics processors and monitors could operate at that speed) and still retain the current character size. Text can currently be generated from vector based Type I and TrueType fonts for rasterizing at any resolution. Image scaling is a different and very easy problem.

    The Windows OS is the real culprit holding back general usage of higher resolutions and typeset quality displays because of the OS being handicapped by the inertia of antique display modes. Darn. I want 3200x2400 or more!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now