Startup Time Performance

As always we examined the notebook systems to see how fast they were able to go from off, standby, and hibernate into Windows. Those times are noted in the graphs below.

Boot Time
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
IBM T40p (1.6GHz)

IBM T40 (1.5GHz)

Dell D800 (1.6GHz)

FIC Centrino (1.5GHz)

32

33

38

40

|
0
|
8
|
16
|
24
|
32
|
40
|
48


Out of Standby Time
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
IBM T40p (1.6GHz)

FIC Centrino (1.5GHz)

IBM T40 (1.5GHz)

Dell D800 (1.6GHz)

4

5

6

6

|
0
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7


Out of Hibernate Time
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
IBM T40p (1.6GHz)

IBM T40 (1.5GHz)

FIC Centrino (1.5GHz)

Dell D800 (1.6GHz)

19

19

20

21

|
0
|
4
|
8
|
13
|
17
|
21
|
25

None of the numbers are too surprising. For the most part the startup times are fairly consistent across the notebooks, differing by only a few seconds here or there.

Mobile Performance Gaming Performance - Unreal Tournament 2003
Comments Locked

3 Comments

View All Comments

  • builda - Thursday, February 2, 2006 - link

    There appears to be a wide spread fault with the Gigabyte NB-1401 model notebook, where it reports having system disk errors or cannot find the hard disk. We have 7 of this model notebook and now 6 of them have reported the same problem. After running chkdsk to temporarily repair the errors that had been caused on the harddisk I found the problem returned the escalated to the point the harddisk could not be found. I further checked using Hitachi drive fitness testing tool which reported a cable error on each machine. Originally I returned 3 of these for repair as they were just outside the warranty period and the supplier checked with Gigabyte with the fix being to rub the cable all over with an eraser!! This worked for a short period but the problem has returned a couple of months later and has spread (like a virus) it now affects 6 out of the 7 notebooks. The supplier has just gone into administration and my next step is to approach Gigabyte who's support service has been found to be extremely unresponsive in the recent past.
  • dbiberdorf - Tuesday, July 27, 2004 - link

    I beg to differ with the reviewer. The keyboard on this unit is mediocre, and the track stick buttons are an abomination. They sit too low in the case and have too much travel. It makes my thumbs hurt after a while, and I often have to press them with a finger to get them to activate fully.

    The most powerful notebook in the world loses big points in my book if they built-in keyboard and pointing devices are weak. Certainly it's the case here. Dell, please figure out how to buy good keyboards for your machines!

    Finally, the power adapter, while featuring convienent wrap-around cabling, is phenomenally large. My cordless phone at home is smaller. With the large profile of the machine, the adapter has to go in a side pocket of the carrying case, adding a little more bulge to your day.
  • visibilityunlimited - Thursday, October 30, 2003 - link

    Screen resolution beyond SXGA+ would be unreadable using Windows for example while being more readable using Linux.

    Both the Linux text console and graphics mode X-windows-system screen drivers can be fully customized to display text at any resolution. The text characters could easily be displayed with current software at 1200dpi or more (if only the graphics processors and monitors could operate at that speed) and still retain the current character size. Text can currently be generated from vector based Type I and TrueType fonts for rasterizing at any resolution. Image scaling is a different and very easy problem.

    The Windows OS is the real culprit holding back general usage of higher resolutions and typeset quality displays because of the OS being handicapped by the inertia of antique display modes. Darn. I want 3200x2400 or more!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now