SSD 2018 Benchmarks

BENCH Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking on product categories below!

Browse SSD18 Benchmarks

View Benchmark Results

SSD18 Product Benchmarks

Bench Results

  WD Black SN750 1TB - SanDisk 20-82-007011 - SanDisk 256Gb 64L TLC

  Samsung 970 PRO 1TB - Samsung Phoenix - Samsung 256Gb 64L MLC

Product Ratings & Comparisons

ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1877
267
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
584
483
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2124
60
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
137.64
54.2
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
93.09
71.05
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
191.83
33.7
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
746.69
982.18
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
1.34
2.56
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
431
170
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
550
339
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
69
64
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
54.92
44.35
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
75.59
56.6
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
38.17
34.43
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
1272.99
1573.18
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
0.51
1
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1123
683
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
863
696
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3205
357
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
174.84
72.03
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
100.22
71.89
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
438.7
72.52
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
918.12
1261.24
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
9.68
17.88
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1659
1664
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
52.51
53.12
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1431
1450
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1213
1217
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1456
1506
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
1610.4
2098.1
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
2241.5
2558.2
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
46.2
69.5
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
404
312.5
Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
1253
1460
Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
732
72
Idle Wake-Up Latency
Microseconds - Lower is Better
232
13033
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
1611.5
1678.6
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
489.5
417.67
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
338.3
420.4
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
174.17
141.49
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
1586.3
2945.7
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
551.43
645.13
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
1737.1
2226.2
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
409.01
433.18
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
90.9
139.4
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
65.06
53.99
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
633.9
622.9
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
241.66
193.09

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now