SSD 2018 Benchmarks
BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!
Bench Results
Western Digital WD Black 7200RPM 1TB
Product Ratings & Comparisons
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 49884.61
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 49884.61
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 29507
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 29507
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 60875
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 60875
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 3806.3
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 3806.3
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2515.26
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2515.26
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 5376.36
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 5376.36
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 39.2
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 39.2
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 11.58
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 11.58
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 21407.48
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 21407.48
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 25545.84
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 25545.84
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 17698
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 17698
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1475.13
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1475.13
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2048.5
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2048.5
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1010.37
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1010.37
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 77.96
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 77.96
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 2.77
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 2.77
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 55623
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 55623
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 40743
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 40743
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 115171.66
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 115171.66
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 4487.21
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 4487.21
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2632.04
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2632.04
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 11047.42
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 11047.42
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 65.87
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 65.87
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 101.79
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 101.79
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1565
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1565
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better 57.13
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better 57.13
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1052
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1052
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1129
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1129
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 659
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 659
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 185.7
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 185.7
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 177.9
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 177.9
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 0.5
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 0.5
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 1.9
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 1.9
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 148.5
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 148.5
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 29
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 29
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 0.8
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 0.8
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 0.17
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 0.17
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 185.5
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 185.5
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 34.94
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 34.94
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 184.1
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 184.1
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 33.86
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 33.86
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 0.5
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 0.5
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 0.11
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 0.11
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 1.1
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 1.1
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 0.25
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 0.25
(Obsolete) Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better 3872
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better 3872
(Obsolete) Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
3867
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
SATA LPM Slumber state or NVMe Non-Operational Power State
(Obsolete) Idle Wake-Up Latency
Microseconds - Lower is Better 0
Microseconds - Lower is Better 0