SSD 2018 Benchmarks
BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!
Bench Results
Crucial P1 1000GB
Silicon Motion SM2263 - Micron 1Tb 64L QLC
Silicon Motion SM2263 - Micron 1Tb 64L QLC
Product Ratings & Comparisons
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1806
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1806
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 801
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 801
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1926
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1926
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 191.25
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 191.25
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 102.96
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 102.96
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 298.62
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 298.62
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 728.48
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 728.48
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 1.8
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 1.8
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 689
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 689
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 484
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 484
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 772
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 772
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 75.3
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 75.3
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 73.59
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 73.59
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 76.69
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 76.69
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 1235.83
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 1235.83
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 0.58
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 0.58
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 9979
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 9979
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2335
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2335
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 119536
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 119536
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2035.33
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2035.33
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 431.26
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 431.26
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 7707.62
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 7707.62
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 309.13
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 309.13
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 18.66
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 18.66
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1657
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1657
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better 52.77
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better 52.77
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1432
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1432
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1212
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1212
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1461
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1461
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 1352.4
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 1352.4
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 1647.8
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 1647.8
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 76.2
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 76.2
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 373.1
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 373.1
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 808.8
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 808.8
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 284.16
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 284.16
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 211.2
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 211.2
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 89.37
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 89.37
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 1312
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 1312
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 414.25
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 414.25
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 1484.2
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 1484.2
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 392.97
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 392.97
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 59.9
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 59.9
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 27.9
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 27.9
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 493.2
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 493.2
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 198.45
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 198.45
(Obsolete) Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better 710
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better 710
(Obsolete) Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
11
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
SATA LPM Slumber state or NVMe Non-Operational Power State
(Obsolete) Idle Wake-Up Latency
Microseconds - Lower is Better 73791
Microseconds - Lower is Better 73791
Facebook
Twitter
RSS