SSD 2018 Benchmarks

BENCH Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking on product categories below!

Browse SSD18 Benchmarks

View Benchmark Results

SSD18 Product Benchmarks

Bench Results

  Seagate BarraCuda 500GB

  Samsung 860 EVO 1TB

Product Ratings & Comparisons

ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
8404
6750
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3777
2936
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
18774
7157
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1051.51
698.82
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
391.8
295.99
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1853.8
1188.7
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
205.55
277.06
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
1.89
1.36
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
4160.62
2872
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3163
2297
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
4645
3005
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
376.84
312.43
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
361.6
296.03
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
389.18
325.72
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
280.87
346.62
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
0.59
0.49
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
9022
7031
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
6669
5546
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
25352.83
11790.83
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1171.56
994.2
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
572.31
468.71
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3290.61
2852.42
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
281.45
324.28
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
14
10.68
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1652
1658
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
50.27
50.56
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1399
1430
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1205
1206
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1376
1463
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
459.9
445.2
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
422
443.8
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
25.9
32.1
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
98.2
124
Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
211
219
Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
105
35
Idle Wake-Up Latency
Microseconds - Lower is Better
92
1213
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
268.6
379.7
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
133.18
237.05
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
94.6
195
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
59.6
134.18
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
500.3
492
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
219.62
283.7
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
413.6
445.4
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
145.71
256
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
55.4
70.5
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
39.26
55.36
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
171.9
243.6
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
85.82
166.83

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now