SSD 2018 Benchmarks
BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!
Bench Results
HP EX920 1TB - Silicon Motion SM2262 - Micron 256Gb 64L TLC
Intel SSD 660p 1TB - Silicon Motion SM2263 - Intel 1Tb 64L QLC
Intel SSD 660p 1TB - Silicon Motion SM2263 - Intel 1Tb 64L QLC
Product Ratings & Comparisons
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1678
1900
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
525
845
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1876
2118
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
130.44
198.41
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
78.28
110.43
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
193.87
305.41
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
872.34
711.17
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
2.18
1.56
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
368
740
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
465
690.71
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
324
761
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
78.24
86.79
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
96.08
95.63
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
63.77
79.62
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
1082.98
1101.7
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
0.73
0.56
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3491
22911
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2161
14869
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
23754.49
41457.83
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
478.39
1872.57
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
291.87
394.31
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1137.97
7099.95
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
480.34
303.94
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
18.48
14.61
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1664
1660
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
53.13
52.87
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1443
1436
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1215
1215
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1485
1469
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
2467.3
1399.1
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
1646.4
1674
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
74
72.4
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
359.6
334.8
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
1325.7
799.9
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
301.36
309.98
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
328.2
205.8
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
110.24
96.47
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
2752
1547.8
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
529.39
510.31
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
1503.5
1523.7
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
292.8
439.36
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
94.7
125.4
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
37.54
62.03
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
518.7
414.1
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
166.75
190.37
(Obsolete) Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
712
667
(Obsolete) Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
9
10
(Obsolete) Idle Wake-Up Latency
Microseconds - Lower is Better
Microseconds - Lower is Better
54014
55698