SSD 2017 Benchmarks
BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!
Bench Results
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
Samsung MGX - Samsung 128Gb 32L TLC V-NAND
Samsung MGX - Samsung 128Gb 32L TLC V-NAND
Product Ratings & Comparisons
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 3035.92
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 3035.92
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2728
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2728
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2953
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2953
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 7211
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 7211
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 3443
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 3443
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 6839
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 6839
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 35329
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 35329
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 10256
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 10256
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 18398
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 18398
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 38.4
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 38.4
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 178.1
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 178.1
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 387.5
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 387.5
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 410.4
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 410.4
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 86.3
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 86.3
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 243.7
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 243.7
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 442.9
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 442.9
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 447.8
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 447.8
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 73.34
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 73.34
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 129.83
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 129.83
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 201.59
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 201.59
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 155.08
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 155.08
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 199.7
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 199.7
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 334.9
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 334.9
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 126.12
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 126.12
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 167.77
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 167.77
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 657.74
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 657.74
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 3714.5
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 3714.5
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 299.19
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 299.19
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1200.47
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1200.47
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 283.59
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 283.59
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 308.71
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 308.71
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 285.87
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 285.87
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1331.6
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1331.6
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 11.41
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 11.41
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 283.88
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 283.88
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 705.88
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 705.88
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 1.26
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 1.26
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 385.84
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 385.84
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 297.46
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 297.46
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 0.43
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 0.43
Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better 316
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better 316
Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
46
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
SATA LPM Slumber state or NVMe Non-Operational Power State
Idle Wake-Up Latency
Microseconds - Lower is Better 1250
Microseconds - Lower is Better 1250
Facebook
Twitter
RSS