SSD 2015 Benchmarks

BENCH Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking on product categories below!

Browse SSD15 Benchmarks

View Benchmark Results

SSD15 Product Benchmarks

Bench Results

  Samsung 850 Pro 256GB - Samsung MEX - Samsung 86Gbit MLC V-NAND

  Samsung 950 Pro 256GB - Samsung UBX - Samsung 128Gbit MLC V-NAND

Product Ratings & Comparisons

Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
305
1205
AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
298.24
680.17
AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2172.5
568.8
AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >100ms Service Times - Lower is Better
0.19
0.07
AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better
3.48
1.03
AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
16.38
14.83
AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
365.62
769.03
AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better
660.29
205
AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better
0.17
0.05
AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
1.61
1.83
AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
434.38
1409.75
AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better
279.54
56.2
AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better
0.13
0.01
AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
0.59
0.71
Iometer - 4KB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
238.74
282.93
Iometer - 4KB Random Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better
2.1
3.69
Iometer - 4KB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
90.86
132.55
Iometer - 4KB Random Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better
1.74
1.94
Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
509.3
831.39
Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better
2.76
3.93
Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
542.34
1479.52
Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better
3.05
3.99
Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
168.14
192.3
Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better
1.94
2.62
Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
336.31
668.66
Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better
2.57
3.4
Steady-State 4KB Random Write Performance
Average IOPS of Last 400 Seconds - Higher is Better
8499.8
6332.8
Steady-State 4KB Random Write Consistency
IOPS Divided By Standard Deviation - Higher is Better
65.01
18.38
Incompressible Sequential Read Performance
Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better
526.99
2035.05
Incompressible Sequential Write Performance
Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better
498.7
911
Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
20
86

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now