Though we don't typically cover adapter news, this one is worth a special exception. Late last month Club3D announced their DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0 adapter, and since then there has been some confusion over just what their adapter actually supports - a problem brought on by earlier adapters on the market that essentially only supported a subset of the necessary HDMI 2.0 specification. As a result Club3D sent over a second note last week more explicitly calling out what their adapter can do, and that yes, it supports HDMI 2.0 with full 4:4:4 chroma subsampling.

But before we get too far ahead of ourselves, perhaps it's best we start with why these adapters are necessary in the first place. While 4K TVs are becoming increasingly prevalent and cheap, it's only in the last 18 months that the HDMI 2.0 standard has really hit the market, and with it the ability to drive enough bandwidth for full quality uncompressed 4K@60Hz operation. Somewhat frustrating from a PC perspective, PCs have been able to drive 4K displays for some time now, and the de facto PC-centric DisplayPort standard has offered the necessary bandwidth for a few years, since DisplayPort 1.2. However with DisplayPorts almost never appearing on TVs, there have been few good options to drive 4K TVs at both full quality and 60Hz.

An interim solution - and where some of Club3D's promotional headaches come from - has been to use slower HDMI 1.4 signaling to drive these displays, using Chroma Subsampling to reduce the amount of color information presented, and as a result reducing the bandwidth requirements to fit within HDMI 1.4's abilities. While chroma subsampling suffices in movies and television, as it has for decades, it degrades desktop environments significantly, and can render some techniques such as subpixel text rendering useless.

Meanwhile HDMI 2.0 support has been slow to reach PC video cards. NVIDIA offered it on the high-end the soonest with the Maxwell 2 family - though taking some time to trickle down to lower price HTPC-class video cards - while AMD missed out entirely as their initial plans for HDMI 2.0 were scratched alongside any planned 20nm GPUs. Thankfully PC video cards have supported DisplayPort 1.2 for quite some time, so DisplayPort to HDMI adapters were always an option.

However early DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0 adapters were in reality using HDMI 1.4 signaling and chroma subsampling to support 4K@60Hz at reduced image quality. As the necessary controllers were not yet on the market this was making the best of a bad situation, but it was not helped by the fact that many of these adapters were labeled HDMI 2.0 without supporting HDMI 2.0's full bandwidth. So with the release of the first proper HDMI 2.0 adapters, this has led to some confusion.

And that brings us to Club3D's DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0 adapter, the first such full HDMI 2.0 adapter to reach the market. Club3D's adapter should allow any DP 1.2 port to be turned into an HDMI 2.0 port with full support for 4K60p with full image quality 4:4:4 chroma subsampling. After the releases of pseudo-HDMI 2.0 adapters over the last several months, this is finally the real McCoy for HDMI 2.0 adapters.

The key here today is that unlike those early pseudo-2.0 adapters, Club3D's adapter finally enables full HDMI 2.0 support with video cards that don't support native HDMI 2.0. This includes AMD's entire lineup, pre-Maxwell 2 NVIDIA cards, and Intel-based systems with a DisplayPort but not an HDMI 2.0 LS-Pcon. In fact, AMD explicitly stated support for DP 1.2 to HDMI 2.0 dongles in their recent driver update, paving the way to using this adapter with their cards.

While we're covering the specifications, it also bears mentioning that Club3D's adapter also supports HDCP 2.2. Though as HDCP 2.2 is an end-to-end standard this means that the host video card still needs to support HDCP 2.2 to begin with, as Club3D's adapter simply operates as a repeater. As a result compatibility with 4K content on older cards will be hit and miss, as services like Netflix require HDCP 2.2 for their 4K content.

Finally, Club3D will be offering two versions of the adapter: a full size DisplayPort version that should work with most desktop video cards, and a Mini DisplayPort version for laptops and all other video cards. And with a roughly $30 asking price listed today it is an attractive option when it is otherwise unreasonable to replace a video card with one that provides HDMI 2.0 in its place.

POST A COMMENT

28 Comments

View All Comments

  • ImSpartacus - Tuesday, December 22, 2015 - link

    Wasn't displayport strictly for video and hdmi carries both video and audio?

    I always thought hdmi was for tvs and their need for sound while dp was for pcs and their need for more/faster pixels.
    Reply
  • Flunk - Tuesday, December 22, 2015 - link

    No, Displayport supports audio. It even supports transferring multiple video and audio streams all at once and can be used to send arbitrary 3rd party streams too (which is how Thunderbolt 1 and 2 work). displayport is just a much more advanced standard. Maybe implementing for ports costs more, I have noticed that low-end and most mid-range monitors still don't have displayport ports. Reply
  • DigitalFreak - Tuesday, December 22, 2015 - link

    Technically DisplayPort should cost less to implement than HDMI. However, video outputs on a lot of PCs have been VGA / DVI / HDMI only until quite recently. Reply
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, December 22, 2015 - link

    Displayport can carry audio too. Like with HDMI, it's up to the hardware manufacturers on both ends to support it. AFAIK HDMI's unique feature set is limited to being able to pass 100mbit ethernet and AV device control signals on subchannels. Displayport OTOH leads in supporting higher bandwidths, allowing multiple displays over one cable, and not needing a per output timing source (something the HDMI inherited from DVI which inherited it from VGA); which makes it cheaper to put a bunch of outputs on a single card. (This is why historically most GPUs only supported 2 monitors and 4-6 monitor modes have all required at least some of the screens to be on DP.) DP can also serve as an interconnect for the LCD panels inside a laptop (replacing various old legacy options here). Reply
  • wiak - Wednesday, December 23, 2015 - link

    call the oxford dictionary, now a few years is redefined as almost a decade, as DisplayPort 1.2 was released in 2009! :p

    well DP has a AUX channel and alot of neat stuff,, from all the usb-power thingys in the past they learned =P
    Reply
  • Gunbuster - Wednesday, December 23, 2015 - link

    Aww look at that, AMD's promise came true... the market took care of the feature they forgot, after 6+ months. Reply
  • James5mith - Wednesday, February 03, 2016 - link

    Club3D adapters have been out of stock since mid January. Now their website is offline everytime I check it. Did these guys vanish? Reply
  • Alex8642 - Sunday, May 08, 2016 - link

    I can't believe this worked... So I have a GTX 680. I nabbed a common startech 4k 30Hz 4:4:4 which worked. Now, here's the odd part. While messing around with a newer rig I built for a friend with a 980 I plugged things back in incorrectly. (I had the display port with adapter running to my receiver and a dvi to HDMI to my 4K TV. To my incredible surprise the damn dvi to HDMI cable was running 4k 60Hz and Chroma 4:2:0 automatically. I was of the understanding that wouldn't work at all. I have this adapter in the post coming in the mail but in the meantime the cable I least expected to work has been the best solution! No joke. I double and triple checked that it was true. Far better than the DP adapter. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now