GPU Performance

While general performance on the OnePlus 2 ends up being quite disappointing, when focusing on GPU performance we can hope for a much more appealing outcome as Adreno 430 continues to be one of the best GPUs you can get in a mobile device. While I don't expect there to be a large deviation from the performance of other Snapdragon 810 devices, given the unexpected difference with JavaScript and general CPU performance it's worth running the OnePlus 2 through our standard GPU benchmarks to confirm that everything is performing as expected. As always, we start off with 3DMark, followed by BaseMark X and GFXBench.

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Physics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Overall

Snapdragon 810's Adreno 430 GPU is still very fast, and it achieves a very high score in 3DMark's graphics test. As usual, the physics test score basically just scales with frequency and number of cores in use, and with the big cores on the SoC throttling down we see a fairly low result there. I don't usually care much for the overall score, but since it's a weighted average we see the OnePlus 2 sitting near the Nexus 6, although in workloads that mainly stress the GPU you'll actually see a much larger gap between the two.

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Onscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Onscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Offscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Offscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Overall (High Quality)

The OnePlus 2 performs very well in BaseMark X, tracking slightly behind the Mi Note Pro which we previously noted may have some level of additional optimizations at the driver level compared to the other Snapdragon 810 implementations. The improvement over the OnePlus One with its Adreno 330 GPU is quite large, with there being nearly a doubling in performance in the Hangar benchmark.

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Offscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Offscreen)

GFXBench's off screen performance results show that the OnePlus 2 is again a bit slower than the Mi Note Pro. In any case the performance is still very good and only really beaten by Samsung's Exynos 7420 devices, and the iPhone 6s. Since the display resolution is only 1080p you actually get better performance in games that run at native resolution than the Mi Note Pro and Galaxy Note5.

Adreno 430 has always been a good GPU, and in general the GPU performance of Snapdragon 808 and 810 hasn't really suffered in the same way the CPU performance has. At $400 the OnePlus 2 definitely gives you a lot of GPU power, and it's something that differentiates it from what's available at lower prices, and even other devices at the same price like the Nexus 5X.

NAND Performance

NAND performance is becoming a greater focus in mobile devices. To improve performance, vendors like Samsung and Apple have turned to solutions outside of the eMMC storage that is typically used in mobile devices. However, the vast majority of products still use eMMC NAND, and in some cases the performance of that NAND can be low enough to introduce noticeable performance issues when using a device. The OnePlus Two uses a Samsung CGND3R eMMC 5.0 NAND solution, which is the same as the one used in the Mi Note Pro.

Internal NAND - Random Read

Internal NAND - Random Write

Random read speeds track closely with the Mi Note Pro. Random writes end up being quite a bit slower, and this occurs even with repeated tests so I'm not sure exactly what's causing it.

Internal NAND - Sequential Read

Internal NAND - Sequential Write

As expected, sequential read and write speeds track almost exactly with the Mi Note Pro. While the results are nothing ground-breaking, they're in line with what you get from an eMMC 5.0 NAND solution. In most cases another component of the phone will likely end up limiting performance before one runs into issues due to NAND speeds, but you won't see some of the benefits that you get with extremely fast NAND such as extremely quick app installation times, faster media transfers, etc.

System Performance Battery Life, Charging, WiFi
Comments Locked

132 Comments

View All Comments

  • grayson_carr - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    Here's my review. I owned a Moto X Pure for a couple months. Then I got a Nexus 5X. Now I'm selling the Moto X Pure. The Moto X Pure is fast in the sense that it opens and switched between apps quickly, but slow in the sense that its GPU has a tough time pushing that QHD resolution and it often has trouble maintaining a high framerate when scrolling in apps. The Nexus 5X is the opposite, which I vastly prefer. The 5X takes a little longer to open apps than the Moto X Pure, but it feels much smoother when scrolling in most apps and is better at maintaining a high framerate. Also, the Nexus 5X has an awesome fingerprint sensor, a vastly better camera in low light, faster updates, and a better calibrated screen (even with the Moto X Pure display in standard mode and not vivid). Battery life is similar between the two. The two things the Moto X Pure does have going for it over the Nexus 5X is build quality (which is very solid) and the speakers (which are excellent).
  • Landiepete - Friday, December 18, 2015 - link

    I can do that right now for you.

    1. It does not have a ingerprint scanner so if you absolutely want one, walk away.
    2. It doe not have wireless charging, so if you feel plugging it in to a wall socket is too much trouble walk away.

    What it DOES do :
    1. With marshmallow, battery life is about 2 days for me. If you use it intensively, I gather you will have to charge it every day
    2. The screen is excellent
    3. It's not metal, but it does not feel cheap
    4. The memory card is a great way to increase storage without paying the premium handset manufacturers charge for built in storage
    5. It DOES get warm to the touch if you use the fast cores, like when it upates or you use 4K filming, but it won't burn your paws
    6. Contrary to popular belief, the 808 is NOT too slow for the quad res screen. Caveat : I do not use it as a gameboy.
    7. Near stock droid, so no crapware or bloatware. I don't edit movies on my Phone.
    8. Very good camera
    9. It still has the usual USB connector, so your old chargers and car kits still work

    Conclusion : unless your prime goal is to sollicit oohhhs and aaaahhhs from onlookers, I thoroughly recommend it.

    Pete
  • aijazz - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    would be great to get a much awaited nexus 6p review.
  • Devo2007 - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    Given how late this review is, you'll probably be waiting until February.... :P
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    The Nexus 6P review is being done by Andrei and is almost complete. Look for it this week.
  • mcbhagav - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    <bait> Moto X Pure seems to be favorite among the kinda of users visit your site </bait>
  • amdwilliam1985 - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    thank you for the heads up, looking forward to the 6P review.

    I'm so glad I've got the 6P instead of OP2 :)
    When in doubt, go with Nexus ;)
  • zeeBomb - Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - link

    Thusday / Friday, lets get it!
  • Nexus6P - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    Maybe one day a review of me will be posted.
  • LemmingOverlord - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    You, Sir, are in that unique classe of "smartassphones" :D

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now