System & CPU Performance

The Nexus 6P comes with a Snapdragon 810 designed by Qualcomm. This is a big.LITTLE 4x A53 @ 1.55GHz + 4x A57 @ 1.95GHz SoC. As we’ve hopefully come to be very familiar with the chipset over the last couple of months, the key characteristics with which the 6P can differentiate itself from other Snapdragon 810 devices is through software optimizations. In particular the fact that the Nexus 6P comes with Android 6.0 Marshmallow should allow it to be able to showcase some improvements which we’ll dive into a bit later.

First we start by comparing performance of some of our browser-based benchmarks. These are predominantly Javascript tests which require large single-core performance out of the device’s SoCs.

Kraken 1.1 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

In Kraken the Nexus 6P is able to showcase a very good score that’s only beat by, oddly enough, the LG G4. As we’ve come to discover over the past year OEM browser libraries play a large role in device performance, even though we’re using the same Chrome build across different devices we see large differences in performance even within devices who employ the same SoC. It’s relatively unnerving to see this fragmentation in the ecosystem and in particular Chrome performing so differently across devices.

Google Octane v2  (Chrome/Safari/IE)

In Octane the Nexus 6P again performs very well, this time again beating our other devices such as the HTC One M9 or the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro. Among Android devices, only the Galaxy Note 5 - which on Octane is able to show equal performance as it does in its optimized stock browser - is able to beat it.

WebXPRT 2015 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

On WebXPRT again we see the 6P performs extremely well among Android devices, only being able to be beat by Samsung’s Exynos 7420 devices in the stock browser.

Continuing onto our system benchmarks, we start with Basemark OS II 2.0 from Basemark (formerly Rightware).

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Web

In the web test the Nexus 6P is yet again found at the high-end of the charts as it is able to provide good numbers. As we’ve seen in reviews such as on the Mate S it’s not necessarily raw performance that is demanded in these tests but also performance latency which plays a big role.

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Graphics

The graphics sub-test of Basemark has always been kind to the Adreno GPU so here again we see the Nexus 6P perform well, although not quite up to par with the other Snapdragon 810 devices we’ve tested in the past.

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Memory

The Nexus 6P comes in a surprising first place on Basemark OS’s memory test. Again this is a mainly NAND-limited test but in contrast to our other synthetic test, performance and access patterns try to simulate more real-world applications.

Basemark OS II 2.0 - System

While the other tests try to test more realistic workloads, the system benchmark is all about measuring peak performance in a given set of scenarios. Here the Nexus 6P fares similarly to the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro but falls behind Exynos 7420 devices such as the Note 5.

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Overall

While I’m not a great fan of overall aggregate benchmark scores, we still see the Nexus 6P among the top of today’s currently available Android devices.

Moving on to PCMark from Futuremark, we’ll use a suite of tests that not only try to mimic real-world usage patterns, but actually make use of APIs that we currently find in use by many day-to-day applications.

Starting with the web browsing test we find the application use Android’s built-in WebView container which relies on OS-dependent components.

PCMark - Web Browsing

Here we see the Nexus 6P lead performance, slightly beating the Note 5. We’re also likely seeing advantages due to Android 6.0 as the Mi Note Pro, our other device with the Snapdragon 810 lags over a thousand points behind.

PCMark - Video Playback

On the video playback score the Nexus 6P comes in towards the middle of the pack. The video test is a benchmark of both the video decoding hardware and software layers of the device, as well as the NAND speed, as fast seeking through the video is performed to test out how rapidly the device can resume playback.

PCMark - Writing

Now onto the writing test we come to one of the larger mysteries of the new Nexus 6’s performance. Both the Nexus 5X and the 6P seem to have large issues with PCMark’s writing test. The test itself consist of text manipulation and some file I/O, but most importantly it’s that this is purely a Java based test. Due to the way Android is architected, this means the code is handled and executed by the Android RunTime (ART). Futuremark have done a fantastic job in creating a test-case which is very sensitive to performance differences in the runtime.

At first when seeing these scores I thought that this was a side-effect of Android 6.0’s new big.LITTLE optimizations (which we’ll get back to in a later section), but even after turning those settings off the scores remained the same. After testing some other Java-based benchmarks I came to the conclusion that this has to be a software issue.

PCMark - Photo Editing

The photo editing uses RenderScript kernels to apply image processing on a set of pictures. With help of a powerful GPU the Nexus 6P performs top of the class

PCMark - Work Performance Overall

Due to the disappointing writing sub-score the Nexus 6P ends up third in the overall PCMark work performance score. Nevertheless, this is a good showing for the Snapdragon 810 device as it manages to slightly beat the Mi Note Pro and the HTC One M9.

Software UI, NAND & WiFi Performance GPU Performance & Device Thermals
POST A COMMENT

219 Comments

View All Comments

  • gochichi - Saturday, February 27, 2016 - link

    Amen. Pure android is the best mobile os out. The only thing about Apple is that they do a great job integrating their different devices. Reply
  • CJ_Jacobs - Saturday, December 19, 2015 - link

    There's not a single "Stock Android" device being sold to consumers. Even Google has made the distinction, during its own keynotes, that AOSP is the only true form of "Stock Android" and its Nexus devices are its vision of Android just as the versions of Android from Samsung, LG, etc. are those manufacturers vision of Android.

    http://www.androidcentral.com/what-stock-android

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-main-difference...
    Reply
  • eallan - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    I find the back button on the left easier to reach as I don't have to bend my thumb severely, merely rotate it. Stock android is excellent. Benchmarks can show so interesting data, but using my 6p vs my Note5 it's insane how much smoother the performance is on the 6p. Reply
  • James5mith - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    I too found that odd. Especially since my Nexus 7 with Marshmallow on it has a brightness slider in the notification area. Reply
  • whiteiphoneproblems - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    iOS's main "back" action is a simple right-swipe from left edge, which is the best implementation of all. I know you're referring to the recently added "Back to previous app" button, which it's true is in the upper corner (not sure where else they would put it); but I reckon this is used much less frequently than the "back-swipe" action within an app. (On the new 6s phones, you can also go back to previous app via 3D touch -- a hard press on right edge.) Reply
  • whiteiphoneproblems - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    (Sorry, I meant "left edge") Reply
  • ChronoReverse - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    Nice thing about Android is I can add that to any phone even without root (it's just an app).

    Still, I'd wager that the majority of iPhone users aren't even aware of these because they're not discoverable. Many people have gone whoaa~ when I use the multi-finger gestures on an iPad.
    Reply
  • whiteiphoneproblems - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    You can add "back-swipe" to Android with just an app? That's interesting, what is it? Reply
  • ChronoReverse - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    All in One Gestures allows you to set the various "zones" on your screen edge to be swipeable in order to execute a command. I have the right edge set to be equivalent to "back". It's useful for fullscreen applications, saving an extra swipe to bring up the on-screen keys. Reply
  • doggface - Thursday, December 17, 2015 - link

    Downloaded and thankyou. This is a great little app. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now