The Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Review: Raising The Barby Brett Howse on October 21, 2015 9:00 AM EST
System Performance - Testing Skylake
Although the Skylake U-series processors were announced a while ago, until now we’ve yet to get our hands on any devices that are actually shipping with it. Much like the Surface 3, Microsoft is one of the first out of the gate with a new processor from Intel which I think is a good sign for the future. If you want to check out all of the details of Skylake-U, check out the architecture analysis here.
The Surface Pro 4 model that I was sampled has the middle-tier processor which I think is going to be the most popular one with customers. The i5-6300U is a dual-core processor with Hyperthreading, and it has a 2.4 GHz base frequency with turbo up to 3 GHz. Being a U-series processor, it has a TDP of 15 Watts.
The Surface Pro 4 was run through our standard notebook workloads and we can compare some of the scores to tablets as well. Ultimately there just are not enough good cross platform Windows and Android/iOS benchmarks to get a great feel for general system performance versus tablets not running Windows, but we will show what we can.
As far as tablets go, there is really nothing that comes close to the performance of Surface Pro 4. A full 15 Watt CPU (even in such a small package) affords quite a bit more performance than anything based on lower TDP ARM chips. Skylake shows some great numbers here.
Next up are the notebook workloads. Since the Surface Pro 4 is clearly aimed at Ultrabooks it has to be tested against them as well. Luckily on Windows there are plenty of options for testing performance and it is a true comparison since we don’t have to deal with comparing across platforms.
PCMark is a nice comprehensive benchmark which attempts to simulate real world workloads. Some of the tests require burst performance, some require sustained performance, and other factors like the GPU and even the display resolution come into play. The Surface Pro 4 does very well in these tests with the i5 version having as good or better performance than some of the i7 Broadwell Ultrabooks. The high resolution can hurt the scores but they are still very good.
Cinebench does rendering on the CPU and loads the CPU to 100% for the duration. Higher frequencies and more cores can make a significant difference especially on the multi-threaded run of this test. Here we can see Skylake gets a fairly modest increase in performance over the Broadwell including the i7-5600U in the X1 Carbon. Multi-threaded workloads have gained the most. Compared to Surface Pro 3 which has an i5-4300U Haswell chip, the multi-threaded increase is 22.7% and the single-core score is increased 21.4%. A 20% gain over the previous model is a pretty nice amount.
Once again this test is very much based on CPU performance. More cores and faster frequencies can make a big difference on this test, and Skylake shows another nice boost over Broadwell. It’s quicker than the i7-5600U in this test as well. Skylake didn’t get a big boost in IPC, but the efficiencies built in allow it to turbo better and longer. Not too shabby.
Once again we can take a look at browser benchmarks, but this time comparing the scores amongst other notebooks. The tests on the Surface Pro 4 were done with Edge as the browser, and most of the others with the exception of the Acer S7 were done with Google Chrome.
Once again the i5-6300U shows great performance in the web benchmarks. WebXPRT is the one test that Chrome shows a gain over, but since Edge is the browser that ships with the device, that is the one I want to use now that it has competitive scripting performance.
Overall, the change to Skylake has made a pretty nice jump in performance with the Surface Pro 4. The Intel Core i5-6300U manages to pretty much outperform the Broadwell Core i7-5600U in multi-threaded tests, and single-threaded workloads come in pretty close to the higher clocked Broadwell i7. The performance difference from Surface Pro 3’s Haswell Core i5-4300U is even larger.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
tipoo - Friday, October 23, 2015 - linkThese use 15W CPUs, Iris Pro is still exclusive to full wattage models, not 15-28W ones.
tipoo - Friday, October 23, 2015 - linkThere is however an Iris with 64MB eDRAM for this, which the top end SP4 gets.
limitedaccess - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - linkWas there extensive load testing done to look for signs of throttling under very extended loads? I'm wondering if the Surface Book (as is actually thinner) is display some throttling compared to the SP4 due to the slightly lower numbers?
With the SP3 i3 test (http://www.anandtech.com/show/8287/first-look-the-... there was no throttling under 1 run of the DOTA 2 test (assuming the same test) but further passes exposed this.
Also wondering how the orientation of the device may affect behavior as this was on the features talked about for Skylake.
Any chance of testing the pen latency as was done with the SP3 review? (http://www.anandtech.com/show/8077/microsoft-surfa...
limitedaccess - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - linkJust realized there was more data regarding thermals but in a different section.
randomlinh - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link" the Surface draws heat draws heat" - I believe there's an extra "draws heat" on the cooling section :)
tipoo - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - linkPanos said "Twice as powerful as the Macbook Pro". That's definitely not true of the CPU, but it also looks like the GPU isn't there either. Seems like he was, indeed, just doing some meaningless addition of CPU, GPU, and G5 chipset. Disappoint.Other than that detail it seems pretty sweet, good battery life, trackpad, keyboard, touch, everything. Just high cost
tipoo - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - linkWhoops, that was for the Surface Book, but still true.
Tigashark - Monday, November 9, 2015 - linkThat "Twice as fast" was in reference to Graphics performance of the dGPU version of the Surface Book, in fact they could have stated 3 times as fast.
It was also a way for Microsoft to poke fun at apples far fetched and borderline outright misleading claim that the Iphone 6s was "faster than 80% of the laptops out there" .. Its hard to say MS or Apple are being totally honest.. but at least Microsoft Surface book does have some benchmarks that substantiate the claim in specific circumstances.
Remember Surface book is going after the Graphics tablet market... so their "Twice as fast" claim..even if its dGPU related, IS relevant.
I dont think Apple can substantiate their claim about the 6s.. its been proven otherwise by many websites, comparing Like with Like results in laptop vs phone still shows even the fastest phones are a few years behind mid range laptops in terms of performance.
javipas - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - linkGreat review, as I have expected. <a href=http://theunshut.com/2015/10/21/the-microsoft-surf... would add</a> the problem with lapability on these machines: the Surface Pro 4 and its predecessors are meant to be used on a table. They're not very comfortable on your lap because of the Type Cover support, and that makes them a bad choice in that situations. I use the laptop a lot on my couch and on the bed, before sleeping, and that is a problem :/
ymcpa - Monday, October 26, 2015 - linkAre you using a keyboard in bed? I normally do tablet things on the couch and in bed and fold the keyboard back in favor of the touchscreen and onscreen keyboard. That said, when I needed the keyboard, I had no problem using them in bed or on the couch. Sure, it's not as comfortable as a standard laptop, but it is usable.