Random Write Performance

The random write test is confined to a 16GB portion of the drive, which is otherwise empty. This allows the drive to demonstrate much higher performance than on our performance consistency test that fills the drive. Tasks like installing software updates can modify a lot of files, but aren't hitting the entire disk. Random writes to the entire disk are usually found only in enterprise workloads such as large databases.

Iometer - 4KB Random Write

The 950 Pro's random write speeds aren't benefiting at all from the PCIe interface or the NVMe protocol, and are about 20% slower than the SM951. Since it's happening to both drives it probably isn't a thermal issue, so this may be the result of a firmware change. Still, the Intel SSD 750 is the only retail drive that significantly outperforms the tightly clustered competition.

Iometer - 4KB Random Write (Power)

The higher power consumption during the random write test is a problem, since it's not buying any extra performance.

Samsung 950 Pro 256GB

After increasing significantly from QD1 to QD2, performance and power drop slightly and stay flat for most of the rest of the test. At the very end, a slight drop in power for the 512GB and a more significant drop for the 256GB may indicate a change in what background processing is going on; the drive may be postponing some garbage collection during the onslaught of writes at the maximum queue depth, or it may be a coincidental case of the background processing catching up and throttling back near the end of the test.

Random Read Performance

Our random read performance test is conducted on a full drive and tests queue depths from 1 to 32. We focus primarily on the lower queue depths that are typical of interactive use, but also look at how the performance and power scales to more intensive loads. For desktop use, searching and virus scanning are typically the biggest sources of random reads, and they can exercise some of the larger queue depths.

Iometer - 4KB Random Read

The strong random read performance of the 950 Pro provides great justification for its status as the a flagship drive for the consumer market.

Iometer - 4KB Random Read (Power)

The 950 Pro's power consumption is moderately higher but nowhere close to being proprotional to the performance advantage; the 950 Pro doesn't have to run hot to offer great performance.

Samsung 950 Pro 256GB

Power and performance scaling look very typical here, except I had to expand the performance axis for the 950 Pro. Both drives pass SATA's limits at or before QD16.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light Sequential Performance
Comments Locked

142 Comments

View All Comments

  • AntDX316 - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    we need REAL-WORLD performance than synthetic benchmarks

    this is like how it is with DDR speeds but they do absolutely like nothing even though bandwidth is like 10x in spread difference
  • SmashingTool - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    " and in order to boot from an NVMe drive your motherborad's firmware needs NVMe support."

    ^ Typo
  • Ian Cutress - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Fixed! Thanks :)
  • todlerix - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    How fast does the system boot with the 950 pros? I read the NVMe slows boot times down by a huge amount.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Considering most people only the system once per day, the wait should not be considered an issue. If one BOOTs the machine many times per day, S3 sleep is a quick way back to the desktop.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    *Considering most people only BOOT the system once per day, the wait should not be considered an issue.
  • bji - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Even if I only boot my computer once per day, the time spent waiting for it to boot is annoying and I consider boot times important for that reason. When there is little other user-perceivable difference in SSD drives, a boot that happens 3 or 4 seconds faster is a significant factor.
  • Makaveli - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    You know whats equally annoying people that sit and stare at boot screens lol.

    Go get a bagel, take a piss do something crying over 10 seconds isn't exactly productive.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    This is called being enthusiastic about the wrong thing. If getting to the desktop matters that much to one's productivity, then using S3 resume would be the "logical" thing to do.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Shame on me for making a rational argument to irrational minds... ;)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now