Final Words

Testing of Samsung's 950 Pro revealed some curiosities. Nevetheless, even when showing symptoms of possible thermal throttling, the 512GB sustained respectable performance and in tests that were representative of interactive use it performed extremely well. Users waiting on a full range of Skylake systems to come to the market may need a PCIe to M.2 adapter in order to put the drive in a slot that provides four lanes at PCIe 3.0 speed, but with the added benefit that such adapters can be bought with heatsinks to reduce the chance of triggering thermal throttling.

It's hard to judge pricing when there are limited options in this market segment. The Intel SSD 750 clearly needs to come down in price to be completely sidelined by the 950 Pro. Comparing against SATA drives, the 950 Pro's impressively high scores seem to make a good case for its price premium, but consider how often a particular use case will actually be able to take advantage of the peak speeds offered, which makes the 950 Pro a more prosumer oriented product. The 950 Pro isn't for everyone, and if cost is a sensitive issue then the 950 Pro should be weighed against Samsung's other offerings. But simply for a top of the line drive, the 950 Pro is priced reasonably for enthusiasts.

As a sign of where the SSD market is going, the 950 Pro clearly shows that SSD performance can be improved. Before too long, "high-end SATA SSD" will be an oxymoron; it's time for the transition to PCIe! The transition to NVMe seems less urgent given what Samsung was able to do with the SM951 and XP941 using AHCI, especially due to compatibility and drivers at this time. The power management issues in particular will need to be taken care of before NVMe moves beyond the enthusiast segment, especially for mobile computing.

The PCIe 3.0 x4 interface certainly gives the drive plenty of headroom. And based on the performance of the 950 Pro, it's doubtful that an M.2 drive will be able to saturate the interface before running in to thermal limits while still remaining in the same form factor. Future drives in this area will probably have to implement aggressive power saving techniques in order to keep average temperatures low enough to accommodate bursts of activity. The 950 Pro and the PCIe ecosystem in general have a lot to improve upon here.

The M.2 form factor is also constraining drive capacities to a degree. The back side of the 950 Pro is empty so a 1TB model should be geometrically possible if not economical, but the extra NAND packages would be even more susceptible to thermal problems. Samsung is instead choosing to wait for their 256Gb third-generation V-NAND before offering a larger model of the 950 Pro.

So far, Intel is the only manufacturer that has produced an enthusiast drive using the U.2 connector to provide PCIe x4 to a 2.5" drives. U.2 support is far less common than M.2, but the next time Samsung wants to introduce a major performance boost, they may go for the 2.5" U.2 option. We have already seen U.2 connectors directly on a pair of ASUS motherboards announced this week, and a number of Skylake consumer motherboards will come with M.2 to U.2 adapters specifically for this purpose.

ATTO & AS-SSD
Comments Locked

142 Comments

View All Comments

  • AntDX316 - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    we need REAL-WORLD performance than synthetic benchmarks

    this is like how it is with DDR speeds but they do absolutely like nothing even though bandwidth is like 10x in spread difference
  • SmashingTool - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    " and in order to boot from an NVMe drive your motherborad's firmware needs NVMe support."

    ^ Typo
  • Ian Cutress - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Fixed! Thanks :)
  • todlerix - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    How fast does the system boot with the 950 pros? I read the NVMe slows boot times down by a huge amount.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Considering most people only the system once per day, the wait should not be considered an issue. If one BOOTs the machine many times per day, S3 sleep is a quick way back to the desktop.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    *Considering most people only BOOT the system once per day, the wait should not be considered an issue.
  • bji - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Even if I only boot my computer once per day, the time spent waiting for it to boot is annoying and I consider boot times important for that reason. When there is little other user-perceivable difference in SSD drives, a boot that happens 3 or 4 seconds faster is a significant factor.
  • Makaveli - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    You know whats equally annoying people that sit and stare at boot screens lol.

    Go get a bagel, take a piss do something crying over 10 seconds isn't exactly productive.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    This is called being enthusiastic about the wrong thing. If getting to the desktop matters that much to one's productivity, then using S3 resume would be the "logical" thing to do.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Shame on me for making a rational argument to irrational minds... ;)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now